Quality as a function of quantity in electronic brainstorming

The quality of ideas a team generates constitutes an upper limit on the quality of the problem solving process. Much research has been done about causes of idea quantity and causes of idea quality. It has been noted by some researchers that idea quality appears to correlate with idea quantity, and several have argued that it is not necessary to go to expense and effort required to evaluate idea quality since it correlates with quantity. This paper draws on Team Theory to develop a causal link between quantity and quality. It then presents a low-cognitive-load, high-reliability method for evaluating idea quality. It reports on a study that addresses the question, "Will an increase in idea quantity cause more good ideas to be generated?". The results support the hypothesis that there is a modest causal connection between quantity and quality, but the data suggest other factors are far more important for determining the number of good ideas a team generates. It concludes that researchers must continue to measure the effects of their brainstorming treatments on idea quality; it is not sufficient to assume that quality will always track quantity. Other factors not accounted for by the quality-quantity model may well counter and outweigh this effect.

[1]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  An experimental investigation of the effects of group size in an electronic meeting environment , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[2]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[3]  S. Kosslyn The medium and the message in mental imagery: A theory. , 1981 .

[4]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[5]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[6]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Applying Adaptive Structuration Theory to Investigate the Process of Group Support Systems Use , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Stephen J. Andriole Handbook of problem solving : an analytical methodology , 1983 .

[8]  Steven E. Ekeberg,et al.  THE ROLE OF INTENTIONS IN WORK MOTIVATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR GOAL-SETTING THEORY AND RESEARCH , 1991 .

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming: Beyond Anonymity , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Daniel T. Gilbert,et al.  Thinking backward: some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness , 1989 .

[11]  R. Kanfer Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. , 1990 .

[12]  Harvey J. Brightman Problem Solving: A Logical and Creative Approach , 1980 .

[13]  Robert Owen. Briggs The focus theory of group productivity and its application to development and testing of electronic group support systems. , 1994 .

[14]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Computer-mediated idea generation: the effects of group size and group heterogeneity , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  F NunamakerJay,et al.  Invoking social comparison to improve electronic brainstorming , 1995 .

[16]  Mary T. Dzindolet,et al.  Social influence processes in group brainstorming. , 1993 .

[17]  Irwin D. J. Bross,et al.  Design for Decision , 1954 .

[18]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[19]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[20]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[21]  Steven D. Jones,et al.  Effects of group feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organizational productivity. , 1988 .

[22]  K. Duncker,et al.  On problem-solving , 1945 .

[23]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An integrated framework for the study of group decision support systems , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[24]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. , 1984 .

[25]  J. McGrath Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[26]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[27]  V. Reyna,et al.  Gist is the grist: Fuzzy-trace theory and the new intuitionism☆ , 1990 .

[28]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[29]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Comparison of Laboratory and Field Research in the Study of Electronic Meeting Systems , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..