Ligilactobacillus salivarius MP100 as an Alternative to Metaphylactic Antimicrobials in Swine: The Impact on Production Parameters and Meat Composition

The metaphylactic use of antimicrobials in swine farms contributes to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which constitutes a major challenge for public health. Alternative strategies are required to eradicate their routine use. In a previous study, metaphylactic antimicrobials were replaced by the administration of Ligilactobacillus salivarius MP100 to sows and piglets for two years. This practice positively modified the fecal microbiota and metabolic profiles in the farm. In this work, the farm dataset was used to compare the productivity-related parameters between a 2-year period of routine metaphylactic antibiotherapy and the first 2 years of a replacement with the probiotic strain. The probiotic period improved these productivity-related parameters, from litter size to growth performance. In addition, samples of Longissimus lumborum, including skin and subcutaneous fat, were obtained from the animals ingesting the probiotic strain and controls (metaphylactic antibiotherapy) and analyzed for their pH, water holding capacity, composition, and metabolic profiling. The probiotic intake did not negatively affect the meat composition and was associated with an increase in inosine concentration and a slight tendency for increasing the intramuscular fat content. These factors are considered as biomarkers of meat quality. In conclusion, the substitution of metaphylactic antimicrobials with the administration of the probiotic strain was associated with beneficial productivity and meat quality outcomes.

[1]  I. Kim,et al.  Inosine: A bioactive metabolite with multimodal actions in human diseases , 2022, Frontiers in Pharmacology.

[2]  M. Zhu,et al.  A meta-analysis of Lactobacillus-based probiotics for growth performance and intestinal morphology in piglets , 2022, Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

[3]  S. Kim,et al.  Use of Microorganisms as Nutritional and Functional Feedstuffs for Nursery Pigs and Broilers , 2022, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[4]  J. Osek,et al.  Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria—A Review , 2022, Antibiotics.

[5]  A. Chauhan,et al.  Early-Life Intervention of Lactoferrin and Probiotic in Suckling Piglets: Effects on Immunoglobulins, Intestinal Integrity, and Neonatal Mortality , 2022, Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins.

[6]  M. D’Angelo,et al.  Potential effect of two Bacillus probiotic strains on performance and fecal microbiota of breeding sows and their piglets , 2022, Journal of animal science.

[7]  Ricardo P. S. Oliveira,et al.  Beneficial effects of probiotics on the pig production cycle: An overview of clinical impacts and performance. , 2022, Veterinary microbiology.

[8]  H. Mukhtar,et al.  1H-NMR-Based Metabolomics: An Integrated Approach for the Detection of the Adulteration in Chicken, Chevon, Beef and Donkey Meat , 2021, Molecules.

[9]  S. Delgado,et al.  Replacement of Metaphylactic Antimicrobial Therapy by Oral Administration of Ligilactobacillus salivarius MP100 in a Pig Farm , 2021, Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

[10]  K. Czyż,et al.  Development of Swine’s Digestive Tract Microbiota and Its Relation to Production Indices—A Review , 2020, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[11]  P. Roncada,et al.  Antimicrobial Resistance in Veterinary Medicine: An Overview , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[12]  J. DeRouchey,et al.  Effects of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 on sow and progeny performance, fecal consistency, and fecal microbes during gestation, lactation, and nursery periods. , 2019, Journal of animal science.

[13]  S. Fernando,et al.  The pig microbiota and the potential for harnessing the power of the microbiome to improve growth and health. , 2019, Journal of animal science.

[14]  M. Fernández-Valle,et al.  Evaluation of E-beam irradiation and storage time in pork exudates using NMR metabolomics. , 2019, Food research international.

[15]  Hong Yang,et al.  Antibiotic Application and Resistance in Swine Production in China: Current Situation and Future Perspectives , 2019, Front. Vet. Sci..

[16]  S. Tamuly,et al.  Effect of probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici FT28 on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, health status, meat quality, and intestinal morphology in growing pigs , 2018, Veterinary world.

[17]  A. Verma,et al.  Selection and characterization of probiotic lactic acid bacteria and its impact on growth, nutrient digestibility, health and antioxidant status in weaned piglets , 2018, PloS one.

[18]  S. Lamichhane,et al.  1H HR-MAS NMR-based metabolomics analysis for dry-fermented sausage characterization. , 2018, Food chemistry.

[19]  A. Verma,et al.  Efficacy of species-specific probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici FT28 on blood biochemical profile, carcass traits and physicochemical properties of meat in fattening pigs. , 2017, Research in veterinary science.

[20]  M. Cambero,et al.  Metabolomics of meat exudate: Its potential to evaluate beef meat conservation and aging. , 2015, Analytica chimica acta.

[21]  J. Segura,et al.  Effect of sex, dietary glycerol or dietary fat during late fattening, on fatty acid composition and positional distribution of fatty acids within the triglyceride in pigs. , 2015, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[22]  M. Tyra,et al.  Fatty acid profile of pork from a local and a commercial breed , 2015 .

[23]  J. Prescott The resistance tsunami, antimicrobial stewardship, and the golden age of microbiology. , 2014, Veterinary microbiology.

[24]  P. Thacker Alternatives to antibiotics as growth promoters for use in swine production: a review , 2013, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology.

[25]  M. Cambero,et al.  Use of E-Beam for Shelf-Life Extension and Sanitizing of Marinated Pork Loin , 2012, International journal of microbiology.

[26]  M. Calvo,et al.  1H‐HRMAS NMR study of smoked Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) , 2010, Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC.

[27]  M. S. Brewer,et al.  Intramuscular fat content has little influence on the eating quality of fresh pork loin chops. , 2008, Journal of animal science.

[28]  H. J. Andersen,et al.  Development of inosine monophosphate and its degradation products during aging of pork of different qualities in relation to basic taste and retronasal flavor perception of the meat. , 2006, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[29]  J. Hocquette,et al.  Innovations in beef production systems that enhance the nutritional and health value of beef lipids and their relationship with meat quality. , 2006, Meat science.

[30]  A. V. Chernikov,et al.  Guanosine and Inosine Display Antioxidant Activity, Protect DNA In Vitro from Oxidative Damage Induced by Reactive Oxygen Species, and Serve as Radioprotectors in Mice , 2006, Radiation research.

[31]  Csaba Szabó,et al.  Immunomodulatory and neuroprotective effects of inosine. , 2004, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[32]  M. Cambero,et al.  Effect of dietary linseed oil and α-tocopherol on pork tenderloin (Psoas major) muscle. , 2003, Meat science.

[33]  P. Purslow,et al.  The effect of ageing on the water-holding capacity of pork: role of cytoskeletal proteins. , 2001, Meat science.

[34]  R. Garcés,et al.  One-step lipid extraction and fatty acid methyl esters preparation from fresh plant tissues. , 1993, Analytical biochemistry.

[35]  T. Ulbricht,et al.  Coronary heart disease: seven dietary factors , 1991, The Lancet.

[36]  R. G. Kauffman,et al.  A comparison of methods to estimate water-holding capacity in post-rigor porcine muscle. , 1986, Meat science.