INTERACTION OF IRRADIANCE AND SOIL NUTRIENT SUPPLY ON GROWTH OF SEEDLINGS OF TEN EUROPEAN TALL-SHRUB SPECIES AND FAGUS SYLVATICA

1 Seedlings of 10 European tall-shrub species and the shade-tolerant tree Fagus sylvatica were grown at 0.3, 1.6, 11, and 63% daylight for 110 days on chalk grassland soil, and on a more nutrient-rich soil developed under Crataegus monogyna. 2 Crataegus monogyna, Fagus, Juniperus communis, Cornus sanguinea, Ligustrum vulgare and Rosa canina suffered high mortality in 0.3% daylight, but only the first three had losses in 1.6%. Overall mortality in deep shade (0.3, 1.6%) was considerably lower in Euonymus europaeus, Rhamnus catharticus, Viburnum lantana and V. opulus. Average mortality in deep shade on grassland soil was negatively correlated with embryo-cum-endosperm dry mass (EEM). Overall mortality in deep shade was significantly greater with higher nutrient supply. 3 In 63% daylight relative growth rate (RGR) was negatively correlated with log EEM, and positively with specific leaf area (SLA, leaf area/leaf dry mass) at time of planting but not at final harvest, i.e. differences in RGR were determined more by unit leaf rate (rate of dry mass gain/leaf area) in the latter part of the experiment. 4 The responses of the species to irradiance and nutrient supply were appreciably different. Cornus, Ligustrum, Prunus spinosa, Rhamnus, and Rosa increased yield strongly under high irradiance on nutrient-poor soil, and responded also markedly to nutrients. Viburnum lantana and Euonymus grew relatively slowly in all treatments, but the former was responsive to nutrients, even in deep shade. Viburnum opulus was more responsive to irradiance but responded to nutrients only in 11 % daylight. Crataegus grew more slowly on its 'own' soil than on grassland soil. Juniperus differed consistently from the other species, growing slowly, and responding strongly to irradiance. Fagus responded moderately to irradiance and not to nutrient supply. 5 In shade allocation to roots decreased, while allocation to stem and to leaves increased generally. All species produced a smaller number and total area of leaves, and increased SLA and leaf area ratio (leaf area/total dry mass). Shoot and root lengths were reduced in shade. 6 The results are discussed in relation to the roles of the various species during secondary succession, and their regeneration niches.

[1]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types , 1996 .

[2]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seedling longevity under deep shade in relation to seed size , 1996 .

[3]  Philip E. Hulme,et al.  HERBIVORY, PLANT REGENERATION, AND SPECIES COEXISTENCE , 1996 .

[4]  J. Kollmann,et al.  Light demands of shrub seedlings and their establishment within scrublands , 1996 .

[5]  John A. Silander,et al.  Juvenile Tree Survivorship as a Component of Shade Tolerance , 1995 .

[6]  M. Westoby,et al.  The role of large seed size in shaded conditions: experimental evidence , 1994 .

[7]  P. Isenmann,et al.  Bird-dispersed seed rain and seedling establishment in patchy Mediterranean vegetation , 1994 .

[8]  Charles D. Canham,et al.  Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests : interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees , 1994 .

[9]  Peter J. Grubb,et al.  Physiological basis and ecological significance of the seed size and relative growth rate relationship in Mediterranean annuals , 1993 .

[10]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  Effects of Meadow Vole Population Density on Tree Seedling Survival in Oil Fields , 1993 .

[11]  R. Latham.  Co‐Occurring Tree Species Change Rank in Seedling Performance with Resources Varied Experimentally , 1992 .

[12]  F. Putz,et al.  Mechanisms of arrested succession in shrublands: root and shoot competition between shrubs and tree seedlings , 1992 .

[13]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Short-term dynamics of a neotropical forest: why ecological research matters to tropical conservation and management , 1992 .

[14]  William G. Lee,et al.  Patterns of resource allocation in fleshy fruits of nine European tall-shrub species , 1991 .

[15]  K. Kikuzawa,et al.  Phenology of tree seedlings in relation to seed size , 1991 .

[16]  P. Marks,et al.  TREE AND SHRUB SEEDLING COLONIZATION OF OLD FIELDS IN CENTRAL NEW YORK , 1991 .

[17]  B. Snow,et al.  Birds and Berries , 1990 .

[18]  P. Vitousek,et al.  GROWTH RESPONSES OF TROPICAL SHRUBS TO TREEFALL GAP ENVIRONMENTS , 1990 .

[19]  H. Ellenberg,et al.  Vegetation Ecology of Central Europe. , 1989 .

[20]  W. D. Billings,et al.  North American Terrestrial Vegetation , 1988 .

[21]  P. L. Mitchell,et al.  Responses of three woodland herbs to reduced photosynthetically active radiation and low red to far-red ratio in shade , 1988 .

[22]  J. Wilson.  A review of evidence on the control of shoot: root ratio , 1988 .

[23]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Reproductive Effort in Plants. 2. Does Carbon Reflect the Allocation of Other Resources? , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[24]  J. Grace,et al.  The Role of the Red/Far-Red Ratio in the Response of Tropical Tree Seedlings to Shade , 1986 .

[25]  R. Hill,et al.  Photosynthetic responses to light of Australian and chilean species of Nothofagus and their relevance to the rainforest dynamics , 1985 .

[26]  M. Fenner.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SEED WEIGHT, ASH CONTENT AND SEEDLING GROWTH IN TWENTY‐FOUR SPECIES OF COMPOSITAE , 1983 .

[27]  J. Packham,et al.  The Influence of Shading and of Soil Type on the Growth of Galeobdolon Luteum , 1982 .

[28]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants , 1980 .

[29]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. , 1980 .

[30]  P. Grubb.  THE MAINTENANCE OF SPECIES‐RICHNESS IN PLANT COMMUNITIES: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE REGENERATION NICHE , 1977 .

[31]  R. Phares.  Growth of Red Oak (Quercus Rubra L.) Seedlings in Relation to Light and Nutrients. , 1971, Ecology.

[32]  K. Loach.  Shade tolerance in tree seedlings. II. Growth analysis of plants raised under artificial shade. , 1970 .

[33]  K. Loach.  SHADE TOLERANCE IN TREE SEEDLINGS , 1967 .

[34]  T. Hutchinson.  COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF THE ABILITY OF SPECIES TO WITHSTAND PROLONGED PERIODS OF DARKNESS , 1967 .

[35]  P. S. Lloyd,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF SOIL CONDITIONS ON THE COURSE OF SUCCESSION ON THE CHALK OF SOUTHERN ENGLAND , 1967 .

[36]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Seedling Establishment in Vertical Gradients of Sunlight , 1965 .

[37]  P. Redfearn,et al.  Flora of Missouri , 1964 .

[38]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  The Vegetation of Wisconsin , 1960 .

[39]  G. E. Bard.  Secondary Succession on the Piedmont of New Jersey , 1952 .

[40]  G. E. Blackman,et al.  Physiological and Ecological Studies in the Analysis of Plant Environment VII. An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Light Intensity on the Net Assimilation Rate, Leaf-Area Ratio, and Relative Growth Rate of Different Species , 1951 .

[41]  A. Watt.  The Vegetation of the Chiltern Hills, with Special Reference to the Beechwoods and their Seral Relationships , 1934 .

[42]  G. Steinbauer.  GROWTH OF TREE SEEDLINGS IN RELATION TO LIGHT INTENSITY AND CONCENTRATION OF NUTRIENT SOLUTION. , 1932, Plant physiology.

[43]  J. Kollmann.  Regeneration window for fleshy-fruited plants during scrub development on abandoned grassland. , 1995 .

[44]  John A. Silander,et al.  Sapling growth as a function of resources in a north temperate forest , 1994 .

[45]  J. Rodwell,et al.  British Plant Communities Vol. 1. Woodlands and Scrub , 1992 .

[46]  J. Rodwell.  Woodlands and scrub , 1991 .

[47]  R. Peters,et al.  The allometry of seed weight and seedling relative growth rate. , 1990 .

[48]  Professor Dr. Roelof A. A. Oldeman,et al.  Forests: Elements of Silvology , 1990, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[49]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  SUNFLECKS AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN PLANT CANOPIES , 1990 .

[50]  P. Grubb,et al.  INTERACTION OF LIGHT AND MINERAL NUTRIENT SUPPLY IN THE GROWTH OF IMPATIENS PARVIFLORA , 1982 .

[51]  P. Lovell,et al.  THE ROLE OF THE COTYLEDONS IN FOUR ACER SPECIES AND IN FAGUS SYLVATICA DURING EARLY SEEDLING DEVELOPMENT , 1976 .

[52]  G. Evans,et al.  The quantitative analysis of plant growth , 1972 .

[53]  H. Fowells.  Silvics of forest trees of the United States. , 1965 .

[54]  N. Y. Sandwith,et al.  A Californian Local Flora@@@Flora of the Santa Cruz Mountains of California , 1961 .

[55]  G. E. Blackman,et al.  Physiological and Ecological Studies in the Analysis of Plant Environment , 1959 .