Robust Causal Inference for Incremental Return on Ad Spend with Randomized Geo Experiments

Evaluating the incremental return on ad spend (iROAS) of a prospective online marketing strategy---that is, the ratio of the strategy's causal effect on some response metric of interest relative to its causal effect on the ad spend---has become progressively more important as advertisers increasingly seek to better understand the impact of their marketing decisions. Although randomized "geo experiments" are frequently employed for this evaluation, obtaining reliable estimates of the iROAS can be challenging as oftentimes only a small number of highly heterogeneous units are used. In this paper, we formulate a novel statistical framework for inferring the iROAS of online advertising in a randomized paired geo experiment design which further motivates and provides new insights into Rosenbaum's arguments on instrumental variables, and we propose and develop a robust and distribution-free estimator "Trimmed Match" which adaptively trims poorly matched pairs. Using numerical simulations and real case studies, we show that Trimmed Match can be more efficient than some alternatives, and we investigate the sensitivity of the estimator to some violations of its assumptions. Consistency and asymptotic normality are also established for a fixed trim rate. Technical proofs are provided in the appendix.

[1]  Cun-Hui Zhang,et al.  Lasso adjustments of treatment effect estimates in randomized experiments , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Probal Chaudhuri,et al.  ON THE DERIVATIVES OF THE TRIMMED MEAN , 2012 .

[3]  Jon Vaver,et al.  Measuring Ad Effectiveness Using Geo Experiments , 2011 .

[4]  Peng Ding,et al.  Randomization inference for treatment effect variation , 2014, 1412.5000.

[5]  Peter J. Bickel,et al.  Mathematical Statistics: Basic Ideas and Selected Topics, Volume II , 2015 .

[6]  Roger Koenker,et al.  Quantile Regression : Penalized from : Handbook of Quantile Regression , 2018 .

[7]  Dylan S. Small,et al.  Building a Stronger Instrument in an Observational Study of Perinatal Care for Premature Infants , 2010 .

[8]  Mitchell J. Mergenthaler Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks , 1979 .

[9]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[10]  Steven L. Scott,et al.  Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models , 2015, 1506.00356.

[11]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Asymptotic theory of rerandomization in treatment–control experiments , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  P. Rosenbaum Covariance Adjustment in Randomized Experiments and Observational Studies , 2002 .

[13]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Online Advertising , 2019, Adv. Comput..

[14]  P. Ding,et al.  General Forms of Finite Population Central Limit Theorems with Applications to Causal Inference , 2016, 1610.04821.

[15]  B. Ripley,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2018, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[16]  Ji Chen,et al.  The Seasonality Of Paid Search Effectiveness From A Long Running Field Test , 2016, EC.

[17]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables: Comment , 1996 .

[18]  J. Tukey,et al.  LESS VULNERABLE CONFIDENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE PROCEDURES FOR LOCATION BASED ON A SINGLE SAMPLE : TRIMMING/WINSORIZATION 1 , 2016 .

[19]  Brett R. Gordon,et al.  A Comparison of Approaches to Advertising Measurement: Evidence from Big Field Experiments at Facebook , 2018, Mark. Sci..

[20]  Justin M. Rao,et al.  The Unfavorable Economics of Measuring the Returns to Advertising , 2014 .

[21]  Sören R. Künzel,et al.  Metalearners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Kirthi Kalyanam,et al.  Cross channel effects of search engine advertising on brick & mortar retail sales: Meta analysis of large scale field experiments on Google.com , 2018 .

[23]  S. Geer Empirical Processes in M-Estimation , 2000 .

[24]  Randall A. Lewis,et al.  Ghost Ads: Improving the Economics of Measuring Online Ad Effectiveness , 2017 .

[25]  Peng Wang,et al.  Estimating Ad Effectiveness using Geo Experiments in a Time-Based Regression Framework , 2017 .

[26]  D. Rubin [On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9.] Comment: Neyman (1923) and Causal Inference in Experiments and Observational Studies , 1990 .

[27]  Hal R Varian,et al.  Causal inference in economics and marketing , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Mike Perry,et al.  Bias Correction For Paid Search In Media Mix Modeling , 2018, 1807.03292.

[29]  Steven Tadelis,et al.  Consumer Heterogeneity and Paid Search Effectiveness: A Large Scale Field Experiment , 2014 .

[30]  David H. Reiley,et al.  Here, there, and everywhere: correlated online behaviors can lead to overestimates of the effects of advertising , 2011, WWW.

[31]  Jordi Forné,et al.  Online advertising: Analysis of privacy threats and protection approaches , 2017, Comput. Commun..

[32]  C. Blumberg Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction , 2016 .

[33]  Peter Hall,et al.  Large sample properties of Jaeckel's adaptive trimmed mean , 1981 .

[34]  R. Dudley Central Limit Theorems for Empirical Measures , 1978 .

[35]  Stephanie Sapp,et al.  Near Impressions for Observational Causal Ad Impact , 2017 .

[36]  Dylan S. Small,et al.  War and Wages , 2008 .

[37]  Jon Vaver,et al.  Periodic Measurement of Advertising Effectiveness Using Multiple-Test-Period Geo Experiments , 2012 .

[38]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables , 1993 .

[39]  D. Basu Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test , 1980 .

[40]  Louis A. Jaeckel Some Flexible Estimates of Location , 1971 .

[41]  W. Lin,et al.  Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: Reexamining Freedman's critique , 2012, 1208.2301.

[42]  C. Rothe Robust Confidence Intervals for Average Treatment Effects Under Limited Overlap , 2017, SSRN Electronic Journal.