Searching for Life Motion Signals

The visual search paradigm has been widely used to study the mechanisms underlying visual attention, and search asymmetry provides a source of insight into preattentive visual features. In the current study, we tested visual search with biological-motion stimuli that were spatially scrambled or that represented feet only and found that observers were more efficient in searching for an upright target among inverted distractors than in searching for an inverted target among upright distractors. This suggests that local biological-motion signals can act as a basic preattentive feature for the human visual system. The search asymmetry disappeared when the global configuration in biological motion was kept intact, which indicates that the attentional effects arising from biological features (e.g., local motion signals) and global novelty (e.g., inverted human figure) can interact and modulate visual search. Our findings provide strong evidence that local biological motion can be processed independently of global configuration and shed new light on the mechanisms of visual search asymmetry.

[1]  W. Dittrich.  Action Categories and the Perception of Biological Motion , 1993, Perception.

[2]  N. Troje,et al.  Person identification from biological motion: Effects of structural and kinematic cues , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Q. Vuong,et al.  Incidental Processing of Biological Motion , 2004, Current Biology.

[4]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  The visual perception of human locomotion. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[6]  Masaki Tomonaga,et al.  Visual search for orientation of faces by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): face-specific upright superiority and the role of facial configural properties , 2006, Primates.

[7]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Familiarity and pop-out in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  The perception of biological motion across apertures , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  J A Beintema,et al.  Perception of biological motion without local image motion , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  P. Malinowski,et al.  The effect of familiarity on visual-search performance: Evidence for learned basic features , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  S. Sumi.  Upside-down Presentation of the Johansson Moving Light-Spot Pattern , 1984, Perception.

[13]  J. Wolfe.  Asymmetries in visual search: An introduction , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  J. Lange,et al.  Visual perception of biological motion by form: a template-matching analysis. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[15]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the gender of walkers from point-lights mounted on ankles: Some second thoughts , 1978 .

[16]  P Jolicoeur,et al.  Impact of Quality of the Image, Orientation, and Similarity of the Stimuli on Visual Search for Faces , 1994, Perception.

[17]  J. Freyd,et al.  Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[19]  N. F. Troje,et al.  2.13 – Biological Motion Perception , 2008 .

[20]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[21]  Karl Verfaillie,et al.  Perception of biological motion: A stimulus set of human point-light actions , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[22]  G. Mather,et al.  Low-level visual processing of biological motion , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[24]  H. Nothdurft.  Faces and Facial Expressions do not Pop Out , 1993, Perception.

[25]  J. Norman,et al.  Aging and the perception of biological motion. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[26]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[27]  Masaki Tomonaga,et al.  Investigating Visual Perception and Cognition in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) Through Visual Search and Related Tasks: From Basic to Complex Processes , 2008 .

[28]  B. Bertenthal,et al.  Converging operations revisited: Assessing what infants perceive using discrimination measures , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[30]  Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al.  Global Processing of Biological Motions , 1994 .

[31]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[32]  David C. Burr,et al.  Seeing biological motion , 1998, Nature.

[33]  N. Troje,et al.  The Inversion Effect in Biological Motion Perception: Evidence for a “Life Detector”? , 2006, Current Biology.

[34]  E. Reingold,et al.  Visual search asymmetry: The influence of stimulus familiarity and low-level features , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  U. Neisser.  VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[36]  Nikolaus F Troje,et al.  Off on the Wrong Foot: Local Features in Biological Motion , 2009, Perception.

[37]  M. Pavlova,et al.  Orientation specificity in biological motion perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  N. Troje.  Decomposing biological motion: a framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[39]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Acceleration carries the local inversion effect in biological motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[40]  Sheng He,et al.  Processing of Invisible Stimuli: Advantage of Upright Faces and Recognizable Words in Overcoming Interocular Suppression , 2007, Psychological science.