Application and development of the LCA methodology to the context of the building sector makes several building specific considerations necessary, as some key characteristics of products in the building sector differ considerably from those of other industrial sectors. The largest difference is that the service life of a building can stretch over centuries, rather than decades or years as seen for consumer products. The result of the long service life is that it is difficult to obtain accurate data and to make relevant assumptions about future conditions regarding, for example, recycling. These problems have implications on the issue of allocation in the building sector, in the way that several allocation procedures ascribe environmental loads to users of recycled or reused products and materials in the future which are unknown today. The long service life for buildings, building materials and building components, is associated with the introduced concept of a virtual parallel time perspective proposed here, which basically substitutes historical and future processes and values with current data. Further, the production and refining of raw material as a parallel to upgrading of recycled material, normally contains several intermediate products. A suggestion is given for how to determine the comparability of intermediate materials. The suggested method for allocation presented is based on three basic assumptions: (1) If environmental loads are to be allocated to a succeeding product life cycle, the studied actual life cycle has to take responsibility for upgrading of the residual material into secondary resources. (2) Material characteristics and design of products are important factors to estimate the recyclable amount of the material. Therefore, a design factor is suggested using information for inherent material properties combined with information of the product context at the building level. (3) The quality reduction between the materials in two following product life cycles is indicated as the ratio between the market value for the material in the products. The presented method can be a good alternative for handling the problem of open-loop recycling allocation in the context of the building sector if a consensus for the use of the fictive parallel time perspective and the use of the design factor can be established. This as the use of the time perspective and design factor is crucial to be able to deal with the problem of long service lives for buildings and building materials and the specific characteristics of the same building materials and components built into different building contexts.
[1]
Tomas Ekvall,et al.
System Expansion and Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment With Implications for Wastepaper Management
,
1999
.
[2]
Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.
ISO 14041: Environmental management — life cycle assessment — goal and scope definition — inventory analysis
,
1998
.
[3]
Rolf Frischknecht.
Life cycle inventory analysis for decision-making
,
1998
.
[4]
M. Hauschild,et al.
Environmental assessment of products
,
1997
.
[5]
Frank Werner,et al.
Economic Allocation in LCA: A Case Study About Aluminium Window Frames
,
2000
.
[6]
R. Frischknecht.
Allocation in Life Cycle Inventory Analysis for Joint Production
,
2000
.