Drift of the Earth’s Principal Axes of Inertia from GRACE and Satellite Laser Ranging Data

The location of the Earth’s principal axes of inertia is a foundation for all the theories and solutions of its rotation, and thus has a broad effect on many fields, including astronomy, geodesy, and satellite-based positioning and navigation systems. That location is determined by the second-degree Stokes coefficients of the geopotential. Accurate solutions for those coefficients were limited to the stationary case for many years, but the situation improved with the accomplishment of Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), and nowadays several solutions for the time-varying geopotential have been derived based on gravity and satellite laser ranging data, with time resolutions reaching one month or one week. Although those solutions are already accurate enough to compute the evolution of the Earth’s axes of inertia along more than a decade, such an analysis has never been performed. In this paper, we present the first analysis of this problem, taking advantage of previous analytical derivations to simplify the computations and the estimation of the uncertainty of solutions. The results are rather striking, since the axes of inertia do not move around some mean position fixed to a given terrestrial reference frame in this period, but drift away from their initial location in a slow but clear and not negligible manner.

[1]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008) , 2012 .

[2]  P. Schwintzer,et al.  Principal axes and principal moments of inertia from recent satellite gravity field solutions , 2002 .

[3]  Florian Seitz,et al.  Mass-related excitation of polar motion: an assessment of the new RL06 GRACE gravity field models , 2018, Earth, Planets and Space.

[4]  서기원,et al.  Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) alias error from ocean tides , 2008 .

[5]  J. Ray,et al.  Multiple-data-based monthly geopotential model set LDCmgm90 , 2019, Scientific Data.

[6]  John C. Ries,et al.  Low degree gravitational changes from GRACE: Validation and interpretation , 2004 .

[7]  Srinivas Bettadpur,et al.  The pole tide and its effect on GRACE time‐variable gravity measurements: Implications for estimates of surface mass variations , 2015 .

[8]  Minkang Cheng,et al.  Variations of the Earth's figure axis from satellite laser ranging and GRACE , 2011 .

[9]  Grzegorz Michalak,et al.  The GFZ GRACE RL06 Monthly Gravity Field Time Series: Processing Details and Quality Assessment , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[10]  Manuela Seitz,et al.  Consistent estimation of geodetic parameters from SLR satellite constellation measurements , 2018, Journal of Geodesy.

[11]  J. G. Williams,et al.  Secular variation of Earth's gravitational harmonic J2 coefficient from Lageos and nontidal acceleration of Earth rotation , 1983, Nature.

[12]  J. Ferrándiz,et al.  The motion of the Earth's principal axes of inertia, caused by tidal and rotational deformations , 2000 .

[13]  On the tidal variation of the geopotential , 1993 .

[14]  M. Watkins,et al.  The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results , 2004 .

[15]  P. Melchior,et al.  The Earth's variable rotation, geophysical causes and consequences , 1981 .

[16]  M. Cheng,et al.  Geocenter Variations from Analysis of SLR Data , 2013 .

[17]  Wei Chen,et al.  New estimates of the inertia tensor and rotation of the triaxial nonrigid Earth , 2010 .

[18]  Z. Altamimi,et al.  ITRF2014: A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame modeling nonlinear station motions , 2016 .

[19]  D. Rubincam Postglacial rebound observed by lageos and the effective viscosity of the lower mantle , 1984 .

[20]  Johannes Bouman,et al.  Second-degree Stokes coefficients from multi-satellite SLR , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[21]  Erwin Groten,et al.  Fundamental Parameters and Current (2004) Best Estimates of the Parameters of Common Relevance to Astronomy, Geodesy, and Geodynamics by Erwin Groten, IPGD, Darmstadt , 2004 .

[22]  A. N. Marchenko,et al.  Evolution of the Earth's principal axes and moments of inertia: the canonical form of solution , 2001 .

[23]  H. Schuh,et al.  On the consistency of the current conventional EOP series and the celestial and terrestrial reference frames , 2017, Journal of Geodesy.

[24]  Michael B. Heflin,et al.  JTRF2014, the JPL Kalman filter and smoother realization of the International Terrestrial Reference System , 2017 .

[25]  M. Cheng,et al.  Deceleration in the Earth's oblateness , 2013 .

[26]  B. Chao,et al.  Global gravitational changes due to atmospheric mass redistribution as observed by the Lageos nodal residual , 1995 .

[27]  B. Tapley,et al.  A new assessment of long-wavelength gravitational variations , 2000 .

[28]  Manuela Seitz,et al.  The 2008 DGFI realization of the ITRS: DTRF2008 , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.