Adverse Rotorcraft-Pilot Couplings - Modelling and Prediction of Rigid Body RPC. Sketches from the Work of European Project ARISTOTEL 2010-2013

Unfavourable Aircraft/Rotorcraft Pilot Couplings (A/RPCs), usually called pilot induced oscillations (PIO), manifested themselves since the early days of manned flight and may still create problems in modern configurations. In Europe, the ARISTOTEL project (Aircraft and Rotorcraft Pilot Couplings - Tools and Techniques for Alleviation and Detection) was set up with the aim of understanding and improving the available tools used to unmask A/RPCs. The goal of the present paper is to give an overview of the work performed on rotorcraft rigid body RPC. Rigid body RPC involve adverse coupling phenomena dominated by helicopter lower frequency dynamics with pilot in the loop. Using as example the Bo-105 helicopter enhanced by a rate command attitude hold control system, the paper will demonstrate the applicability of bandwidth-phase delay and OLOP criteria to unmask Cat I PIO and respectively Cat II PIO. The paper will introduce a novel on-line prediction algorithm, the so- called PRE-PAC (phase aggression criterion) based on analysis of the phase distortion between the pilot input and vehicle response. Special attention will be given to pilot modelling for RPC detection in the so-called boundary avoidance tracking (BAT) concept. In this sense, the paper will determine the critical boundary size leading to a RPC in a tracking task and will connect this to the optical tau theory. Bifurcation theory will be applied to a BAT pilot-vehicle system in a roll step manoeuvre mainly for prediction of Cat III PIO.

[1]  David N. Lee.  Guiding Movement by Coupling Taus , 1998 .

[2]  G. Sell,et al.  The Hopf Bifurcation and Its Applications , 1976 .

[3]  Ronald A. Hess,et al.  Analytical Assessment of Flight Simulator Fidelity Using Pilot Models , 2009 .

[4]  G. Iooss,et al.  Elementary stability and bifurcation theory , 1980 .

[5]  Ezra S. Krendel,et al.  Mathematical Models of Human Pilot Behavior , 1974 .

[6]  Mark B. Tischler,et al.  Digital Control of Highly Augmented Combat Rotorcraft. , 1987 .

[7]  R A Hess,et al.  Simplified approach for modelling pilot pursuit control behaviour in multi-loop flight control tasks , 2006 .

[8]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[9]  Michael Jones,et al.  Identification of Pilot Control Behaviour During Possible Rotorcraft Pilot Coupling Events , 2012 .

[10]  W. von Grünhagen,et al.  Predicting Rotorcraft Flying Qualities through Simulation Modelling. A Review of Key Results from GARTEUR AG06. , 1996 .

[11]  Randy D. Warren,et al.  An Investigation of the Effects of Boundary Avoidance on Pilot Tracking , 2012 .

[12]  Giuseppe Quaranta,et al.  Adverse rotorcraft pilot couplings¿Past, present and future challenges , 2013 .

[13]  R. E. Smith,et al.  PIO: A Historical Perspective , 1995 .

[14]  Hafid Smaili,et al.  A Retrospective Survey of Adverse Rotorcraft Pilot Couplings in European Perspective , 2012 .

[15]  Arthur W. Gubbels,et al.  Acceptance Testing of a Rotorcraft Flight Simulator for Research and Teaching: The Importance of Unified Metrics , 2009 .

[16]  Ezra S. Krendel,et al.  The human operator as a servo system element , 1959 .

[17]  Michael Jump,et al.  Investigation of the Flare Maneuver Using Optical Tau , 2006 .

[18]  Warren F. Clement,et al.  Research on display scanning, sampling, and reconstruction using separate main and secondary tracking tasks , 1970 .

[19]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  Pilot-Induced Oscillations and Human Dynamic Behavior , 1995 .

[20]  H. Duda.  Prediction of Pilot-in-the-Loop Oscillations Due to Rate Saturation , 1997 .

[21]  Michael Jump,et al.  Adverse rotorcraft-pilot coupling: Test campaign development at the University of Liverpool , 2008 .

[22]  J. I. Elkind.  A SURVEY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF MODELS FOR THE HUMAN CONTROLLER , 1964 .

[23]  Hafid Smaili,et al.  Present and Future Trends in Rotorcraft Pilot Couplings (RPCs) - A Retrospective Survey of Recent Research Activities Within the European Project ARISTOTEL , 2011 .

[24]  Jason D. Dotter.  An Analysis of Aircraft Handling Quality Data Obtained from Boundary Avoidance Tracking Flight Test Techniques , 2012 .

[25]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  Minimum Flying Qualities. Volume 2. Pilot Modeling for Flying Qualities Applications , 1990 .

[26]  A. Halanay,et al.  Hopf bifurcations through delay in pilot reaction in a longitudinal flight , 2010 .

[27]  Ronald A. Hess,et al.  Assessment of Flight Simulator Fidelity in Multiaxis Tasks Including Visual Cue Quality , 2001 .

[28]  Ronald A. Hess,et al.  Study of Helicopter Roll Control Effectiveness Criteria. , 1986 .

[29]  Ryan D. Blake,et al.  Boundary Avoidance Tracking: Consequences (and Uses) of Imposed Boundaries on Pilot-Aircraft Performance , 2009 .

[30]  David H. Klyde,et al.  Power Frequency: A Metric for Analyzing Pilot-in-the-Loop Flying Tasks , 2012 .

[31]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  A Review of Quasi-Linear Pilot Models , 1967 .

[32]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  AVIATION SAFETY AND PILOT CONTROL: UNDERSTANDING AND PREVENTING UNFAVORABLE PILOT-VEHICLE INTERACTIONS , 1997 .

[33]  Ronald Hess.  Obtaining multi-loop pursuit-control pilot models from computer simulation , 2008 .

[34]  Massimo Gennaretti,et al.  Adverse rotorcraft-pilot coupling: Recent research activities in Europe , 2008 .

[35]  James B. Dryfoos,et al.  An Approach to Reducing Rotor-Body Coupled Roll Oscillations on the RAH-66 Comanche Using Modified Roll Rate Feedback , 1999 .

[36]  William Gray,et al.  Boundary Avoidance Tracking: A New Pilot Tracking Model , 2005 .

[37]  William Gray,et al.  Handling Qualities Evaluation at the USAF Test Pilot School , 2009 .