Towards Probabilistic Networks of Polarized Evolutionary Processors

The aim of this paper is to discuss two possible ways of introducing some features based on probabilistic concepts and methods in networks of polarized evolutionary processors (NPEP). We associate probabilities with rules in every node such that together with the communication protocol, which is based on the compatibility between the polarization of each node and data navigating through the network, might facilitate the study of biological phenomena as well as software simulations or hardware implementations. The probability associated with rules may be a priori defined and fixed or may be computed dynamically. Probabilities will also appear when communicating data between nodes; these probabilities may be statically or dynamically defined. This note also proposes the study of the impact of these characteristics and see how these new features reduce the gap between the formal model and its practical applicability. Introducing probabilities in NPEP is aimed to decrease the exponential expansion of the number of strings which appear in the computations used to solve NP-problems in a polynomial time. A decreasing of the exponential expansion of this number is achieved with a loss of certainty of the final result which is reached with some error probability.

[1]  Victor Mitrana,et al.  On the size complexity of universal accepting hybrid networks of evolutionary processors , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[2]  R. Shen,et al.  A new characterization of A5 , 2008 .

[3]  Sandra Gómez Canaval,et al.  Distributed Simulation of NEPs Based On-Demand Cloud Elastic Computation , 2015, IWANN.

[4]  Victor Mitrana,et al.  Accepting Networks of Evolutionary Word and Picture Processors: A Survey , 2010, Scientific Applications of Language Methods.

[5]  Sanjay Ghemawat,et al.  MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters , 2008, CACM.

[6]  Sanjay Ghemawat,et al.  MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters , 2004, OSDI.

[7]  W. Daniel Hillis,et al.  The connection machine , 1985 .

[8]  Alfonso Rodríguez-Patón,et al.  A New Class of Symbolic Abstract Neural Nets: Tissue P Systems , 2002, COCOON.

[9]  Gheorghe Paun,et al.  Membrane Computing , 2002, Natural Computing Series.

[10]  Miguel Angel Díaz,et al.  Implementation of Massive Parallel Networks of Evolutionary Processors (MPNEP): 3-Colorability Problem , 2007, NICSO.

[11]  Theresa Beaubouef,et al.  Rough Sets , 2019, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[12]  Luis Fernando de Mingo López,et al.  NETWORKS OF EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSORS: JAVA IMPLEMENTATION OF A THREADED PROCESSOR 1 , 2007 .

[13]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[14]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and In stractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H Freeman, San Fran , 1979 .

[15]  Victor Mitrana,et al.  Networks of Polarized Evolutionary Processors as Problem Solvers , 2012, KES.

[16]  Victor Mitrana,et al.  Hybrid networks of evolutionary processors are computationally complete , 2004, Acta Informatica.

[17]  Victor Mitrana,et al.  A New Characterization of NP, P, and PSPACE with Accepting Hybrid Networks of Evolutionary Processors , 2010, Theory of Computing Systems.

[18]  Victor Mitrana,et al.  On the computational power of networks of polarized evolutionary processors , 2017, Inf. Comput..

[19]  José Miguel Rojas,et al.  Parallel Simulation of NEPs on Clusters , 2011, 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[20]  Alberto Mozo,et al.  NPEPE: Massive Natural Computing Engine for Optimally Solving NP-complete Problems in Big Data Scenarios , 2015, ADBIS.

[21]  Victor Mitrana,et al.  Accepting Hybrid Networks of Evolutionary Processors , 2004, DNA.