Shared-Use Bus Priority Lanes on City Streets: Case Studies in Design and Management

This paper examines the policies and strategies governing the design and, especially, operations of bus lanes in major congested urban centers. It focuses on bus lanes that operate in mixed traffic conditions; the study does not examine practices concerning bus priority lanes on urban highways or freeways. Three key questions addressed in the paper are: 1. What is the physical design of the lanes? 2. What is the scope of the priority use granted to buses? When is bus priority in effect, and what other users may share the lanes during these times? 3. How are the lanes enforced? To answer these questions, the study developed detailed cases on the bus lane development and management strategies in seven cities that currently have shared-use bus priority lanes: Los Angeles, London, New York City, Paris, San Francisco, Seoul, and Sydney. Through the case studies, the paper examines the range of practices in use, thus providing planners and decisionmakers with an awareness of the wide variety of design and operational options available to them. In addition, the report highlights innovative practices that contribute to bus lanes’ success, where the research findings make this possible.

[1]  Tom Cherrett,et al.  Modelling the impacts of shared freight-public transport access lanes in urban centres , 2009 .

[2]  J J Roark ENFORCEMENT OF PRIORITY TREATMENT FOR BUSES ON URBAN STREETS , 1982 .

[3]  J Mirabdal TRAFFIC SIGNAL TREATMENTS OF TRANSIT VEHICLES IN SAN FRANCISCO , 1997 .

[4]  M Linder Tia,et al.  Organization Chart , 2014, Definitions.

[5]  Kittelson,et al.  Bus Rapid Transit Practitioner's Guide , 2007 .

[6]  Evgenia Naumchenko California Penal Code , 2013 .

[7]  R R Blackburn,et al.  PHOTOGRAPHIC ENFORCEMENT OF TRAFFIC LAWS , 1995 .

[8]  Graham Currie,et al.  Intermittent and Dynamic Transit Lanes , 2008 .

[9]  Fernando Boavida,et al.  Traffic Management , 2003, QofIS Final Report.

[10]  Mark A Miller,et al.  Bus Rapid Transit Institutional Issues: The Route from Research to Experience , 2001 .

[11]  Jun Hwan A STUDY ON SETTING-UP A METHODOLOGY AND CRITERION OF EXCLUSIVE BUS LANE IN URBAN AREA , 2005 .

[12]  Wai-Fah Chen,et al.  Construction and maintenance , 2003 .

[13]  J Hodges 'Keeping London Moving' Bus Priority in London , 2007 .

[14]  I. S. Francisco Effective Bus-Only Lanes , 2006 .

[15]  Naoko Matsumoto,et al.  Analysis of Policy Processes to Introduce Bus Rapid Transit Systems in Asian Cities from the Perspective of Lesson-drawing: Cases of Jakarta, Seoul, and Beijing , 2007 .

[16]  Ranjit Kandalgaonkar Rush Hour , 2012 .

[17]  K Gardner ROADSPACE RE-ALLOCATION INCREASING BUS USE , 2000 .

[18]  José Manuel Viegas,et al.  Widening the scope for bus priority with intermittent bus lanes , 2001 .

[19]  Amer Shalaby,et al.  Development, Evaluation, and Selection of Advanced Transit Signal Priority Concept Directions , 2006 .

[20]  B M Yee,et al.  SANSOME STREET CONTRAFLOW TRANSIT LANE: A PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SUCCESS STORY , 1998 .

[21]  S. Green,et al.  City and County of San Francisco , 2011 .

[22]  Sudan Gezira Board Annual report and statement of Accounts , 1951 .

[23]  Экономика Seoul Metropolitan Rapid Transit Corporation , 2013 .

[24]  D. Istance Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development , 1966, Nature.

[25]  M Chang,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF BUS RAPID TRANSIT FOR DECISION-MAKING , 2004 .

[26]  G. Ohlin The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development , 1968, International Organization.

[27]  École française de Rome Mélanges de l'École française de Rome. Italie et Méditerranée , 2022 .

[28]  G N King ROADS AS "PEOPLE MOVERS": THE REAL CASE FOR BUS PRIORITY , 1998 .

[29]  Albert Gan,et al.  Design of transit signal priority at signalized intersections with queue jumper lanes , 2009 .

[30]  Herbert S Levinson,et al.  BUS USE OF HIGHWAYS: PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDELINES , 1975 .

[31]  Dimitrios A Tsamboulas Ex-Ante Evaluation of Exclusive Bus Lanes Implementation , 2006 .

[32]  J. Pucher,et al.  Public transport reforms in Seoul: Innovations motivated by funding crisis , 2005 .

[33]  Arnaud Passalacqua Séparer ou périr : Conception et pratique du couloir réservé à Paris (1960-1975) , 2008 .

[34]  Herbert S. Levinson Bus Use of Highways: State of the Art , 1973 .

[35]  K Gardiner,et al.  The benefits of bus priority within the central London congestion charging zone , 2006 .

[36]  R. Parker The government of New South Wales , 1978 .

[37]  Calgary,et al.  Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition , 2003 .

[38]  John D. Nelson,et al.  Recent Developments in Bus Rapid Transit: A Review of the Literature , 2011 .

[39]  Michael Eichler,et al.  Bus lanes with intermittent priority: Strategy formulae and an evaluation , 2006 .

[40]  Herbert S Levinson,et al.  OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS OF BUS LANES ON ARTERIALS , 1997 .

[41]  Nick Hounsell,et al.  Bus Priority at Traffic Signals—Evaluating Strategy Options , 2003 .

[42]  M. Belman Facts at a Glance , 1991 .

[43]  Sergio A. Lugo-Serrato,et al.  Transit Capacity and Quality-of-Service Manual: Applications to Mexican Transit Systems , 2008 .

[44]  A. Danaher Bus and Rail Transit Preferential Treatments in Mixed Traffic , 2010 .

[45]  P Troy Traffic enforcement in the digital age , 2006 .

[46]  Herbert S Levinson,et al.  BUS RAPID TRANSIT. VOLUME 1: CASE STUDIES IN BUS RAPID TRANSIT , 2003 .

[47]  Graham Currie,et al.  Bus Rapid Transit in Australasia: Performance, lessons learned and futures , 2006 .