Bayesian analysis of a reduced-form air quality model.

Numerical air quality models are being used for assessing emission control strategies for improving ambient pollution levels across the globe. This paper applies probabilistic modeling to evaluate the effectiveness of emission reduction scenarios aimed at lowering ground-level ozone concentrations. A Bayesian hierarchical model is used to combine air quality model output and monitoring data in order to characterize the impact of emissions reductions while accounting for different degrees of uncertainty in the modeled emissions inputs. The probabilistic model predictions are weighted based on population density in order to better quantify the societal benefits/disbenefits of four hypothetical emission reduction scenarios in which domain-wide NO(x) emissions from various sectors are reduced individually and then simultaneously. Cross validation analysis shows the statistical model performs well compared to observed ozone levels. Accounting for the variability and uncertainty in the emissions and atmospheric systems being modeled is shown to impact how emission reduction scenarios would be ranked, compared to standard methodology.

[1]  Armistead G Russell,et al.  Nonlinear response of ozone to emissions: source apportionment and sensitivity analysis. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Daniel S Cohan,et al.  Efficient characterization of pollutant-emission response under parametric uncertainty. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Global crop yield reductions due to surface ozone exposure: 1. Year 2000 crop production losses and economic damage , 2011 .

[4]  George Pouliot,et al.  CHANGES TO THE BIOGENIC EMISSIONS INVENTORY SYSTEM VERSION 3 ( BEIS 3 ) , 2005 .

[5]  Kristen Foley,et al.  Extreme value analysis for evaluating ozone control strategies. , 2013, The annals of applied statistics.

[6]  D. Byun,et al.  Review of the Governing Equations, Computational Algorithms, and Other Components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System , 2006 .

[7]  G. Grell,et al.  A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) , 1994 .

[8]  Robert A Harley,et al.  Adjoint sensitivity analysis for a three-dimensional photochemical model: application to Southern California. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  S. Chib,et al.  Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm , 1995 .

[10]  Shuxiao Wang,et al.  Nonlinear response of ozone to precursor emission changes in China: a modeling study using response surface methodology , 2010 .

[11]  Yongtao Hu,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis of Ozone Formation and Response to Emission Controls Using Higher-Order Sensitivities , 2010, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[12]  C. Hogrefe,et al.  Demonstrating Attainment of the Air Quality Standards: Integration of Observations and Model Predictions into the Probabilistic Framework , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[13]  Sergey L Napelenok,et al.  Efficient probabilistic estimates of surface ozone concentration using an ensemble of model configurations and direct sensitivity calculations. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Alice B. Gilliland,et al.  A method for evaluating spatially-resolved NO x emissions using Kalman filter inversion, direct sensitivities, and space-based NO 2 observations , 2008 .

[15]  Jeffrey Young,et al.  Incremental testing of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 4.7 , 2009 .

[16]  Robin L. Dennis,et al.  Observable indicators of the sensitivity of PM2.5 nitrate to emission reductions—Part II: Sensitivity to errors in total ammonia and total nitrate of the CMAQ-predicted non-linear effect of SO2 emission reductions , 2008 .

[17]  Byeong-Uk Kim,et al.  Likelihood of achieving air quality targets under model uncertainties. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Rohit Mathur,et al.  Dynamic evaluation of regional air quality model’s response to emission reductions in the presence of uncertain emission inventories , 2011 .

[19]  Armistead G Russell,et al.  High-order, direct sensitivity analysis of multidimensional air quality models. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Adrian Sandu,et al.  Adjoint sensitivity analysis of ozone nonattainment over the continental United States. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  G. Casella,et al.  Explaining the Gibbs Sampler , 1992 .

[22]  Eugenia Kalnay,et al.  Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability , 2002 .

[23]  G. Geoffrey Vining,et al.  An investigation of widespread ozone damage to the soybean crop in the upper Midwest determined from ground-based and satellite measurements , 2010 .