Do as we say and as we do: the interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude-behaviour relationship.

Past research on the social identity approach to attitude-behaviour relations has operationalized group norms as a mixture of both descriptive information (i.e. what most people do themselves) and injunctive information (i.e. what most people approve of). Two experiments (Study 1=185 participants; Study 2=238 participants) were conducted to tease apart the relative effects of descriptive and injunctive group norms. In both studies, university students' attitudes towards current campus issues were obtained, the descriptive and injunctive group norms were manipulated, and participants' post-manipulation attitudes, behavioural willingness, and behaviour were assessed. Study 2 also examined the role of norm source (i.e. in-group vs. out-group injunctive and descriptive norms). In both studies, the injunctive and descriptive in-group norms interacted significantly to influence attitudes, behavioural willingness, and behaviour. Study 2 revealed that out-group norms were largely ineffective. The research illustrates that in-groups interactively influence decisions, not only by what they say, but also by what they do, and asserts the value of considering the interaction of descriptive and injunctive norms in accounts of normative influence.

[1]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification , 2007 .

[2]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. , 1990 .

[3]  Blake M. McKimmie,et al.  On being loud and proud: non-conformity and counter-conformity to group norms. , 2003, The British journal of social psychology.

[4]  Richard Shepherd,et al.  Perceived behavioural control, unrealistic optimism and dietary change: An exploratory study , 1995, Appetite.

[5]  M. Hogg,et al.  Who Will See Me? The Impact of Type of Audience on Willingness to Display Group‐Mediated Attitude–Intention Consistency , 2006 .

[6]  Paul Norman,et al.  The Theory of Planned Behavior, Descriptive Norms, and the Moderating Role of Group Identification , 2005 .

[7]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitudes toward objects as predictors of sin-gle and multiple behavioral criteria , 1974 .

[8]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[9]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Majority versus minority influence: When, not whether, source status instigates heuristic or systematic processing , 2003 .

[10]  David A. Wilder,et al.  Some determinants of the persuasive power of in-groups and out-groups: Organization of information and attribution of independence. , 1990 .

[11]  M. Conner,et al.  Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand alcohol and tobacco use in students , 2003 .

[12]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  Collective Identity: Group Membership and Self-Conception , 2008 .

[13]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[14]  Katherine M. White,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: social identity and group membership , 2000 .

[15]  M. Hogg,et al.  The theory of planned behaviour: self-identity, social identity and group norms. , 1999, The British journal of social psychology.

[16]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. , 1998 .

[17]  D. Terry,et al.  Attitude-behaviour consistency: the role of group norms, attitude accessibility, and mode of behavioural decision-making , 2003 .

[18]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis , 2003 .

[19]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Normative Influence and Rational Conflict Decisions: Group Norms and Cost-Benefit Analyses for Intergroup Behavior , 2005 .

[20]  A. Manstead,et al.  Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  D. Trafimow,et al.  The Importance of Subjective Norms for a Minority of People: between Subjects and within-Subjects Analyses , 1996 .

[22]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Social Influences and the Theory of Planned Behaviour: Evidence for a Direct Relationship Between Prototypes and Young People's Exercise Behaviour , 2003 .

[23]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior , 1991 .

[24]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Understanding the September 11 terrorist attack on America: the role of intergroup theories of normative influence , 2002 .

[25]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Group norms and attitude-behavior consistency: The role of group salience and mood , 1998 .

[26]  Winnifred R. Louis,et al.  Group Norms and the Attitude–Behaviour Relationship , 2009 .

[27]  Richard Cooke,et al.  Predicting binge-drinking behaviour using an extended TPB: examining the impact of anticipated regret and descriptive norms. , 2006, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[28]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Augmenting the Theory of Planned Behavior: Roles for Anticipated Regret and Descriptive Norms , 1999 .

[29]  D. Terry,et al.  Volunteer Decision Making By Older People: A Test of a Revised Theory of Planned Behavior , 2000, Special Issue: The Social Psychology of Aging.

[30]  Ryan E Rhodes,et al.  Investigating multiple components of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived control: an examination of the theory of planned behaviour in the exercise domain. , 2003, The British journal of social psychology.

[31]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[32]  Blake M. McKimmie,et al.  Attitude-behaviour relations: the role of in-group norms and mode of behavioural decision-making. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[33]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[34]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[35]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Involvement and Persuasion: Tradition Versus Integration , 1990 .

[36]  M. Hogg,et al.  Safer sex behavior: The role of attitudes, norms and control factors , 1994 .

[37]  Blake M. McKimmie,et al.  I'm a hypocrite, but so is everyone else: Group support and the reduction of cognitive dissonance , 2003 .

[38]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[39]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  The transsituational influence of social norms. , 1993 .

[40]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: When Norms Do and Do not Affect Behavior , 2000 .

[41]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social identity and the attitude–behaviour relationship: effects of anonymity and accountability , 2007 .

[42]  M. Hornsey,et al.  Effects of norms among those with moral conviction: Counter‐conformity emerges on intentions but not behaviors , 2007 .

[43]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  COST‐BENEFIT ANALYSES FOR YOUR GROUP AND YOURSELF: THE RATIONALITY OF DECISION‐MAKING IN CONFLICT , 2004 .

[44]  P. Warr,et al.  Copyright © The British Psychological Society Unauthorised use and reproduction in any form (including the internet and other electronic means) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society. , 2005 .

[45]  David Henry,et al.  Normative Influences on Aggression in Urban Elementary School Classrooms , 2000, American journal of community psychology.

[46]  I. Donald,et al.  A facet approach to extending the normative component of the theory of reasoned action. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[47]  Rajiv N. Rimal,et al.  Understanding the Influence of Perceived Norms on Behaviors , 2003 .

[48]  M. Hogg,et al.  Improving Attitude-Behavior Correspondence Through Exposure to Normative Support From a Salient Ingroup , 2002 .

[49]  M. Sherif,et al.  Book Reviews: The Psychology of Ego-Involvements: Social Attitudes & Identifications , 1947 .