Fat talk and self-presentation of body image: Is there a social norm for women to self-degrade?

The current investigations build upon previous ethnographic research, which identified a social norm for adolescent females to engage in "fat talk" (informal dialogue during which individuals express body dissatisfaction). In Study 1, participants were shown a vignette involving women engaging in fat talk dialogue and were subsequently asked to chose one of three self-presentational responses for a target female: (1) self-accepting of her body, (2) providing no information, or (3) self-degrading about her body. Male and female participants believed the target would be most likely to self-degrade, and that this would lead women to like her, while the self-accepting response would lead men to like her most. Study 2 used the same vignette but participants were asked to respond in an open-ended fashion. Participants again expected the target female to self-degrade. The present findings suggest college students perceive fat talk self-degradation of body image as normative.

[1]  M. Leary,et al.  Self-presentation in everyday interactions: effects of target familiarity and gender composition. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Eric Stice,et al.  Adverse effects of social pressure to be thin on young women: an experimental investigation of the effects of "fat talk". , 2003, The International journal of eating disorders.

[3]  D. Garner,et al.  Cultural Expectations of Thinness in Women , 1980, Psychological reports.

[4]  L. Ray Fat Talk , 2008, Science Signaling.

[5]  W. Davison The Third-Person Effect in Communication , 1983 .

[6]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  The Self and social life , 1987 .

[7]  Jeremy Cohen,et al.  Third-Person Effects and the Differential Impact in Negative Political Advertising , 1991 .

[8]  M. Allen,et al.  Sex differences in self-disclosure: a meta-analysis. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  K. Brownell,et al.  Body Objectification and “Fat Talk”: Effects on Emotion, Motivation, and Cognitive Performance , 2003 .

[10]  Thomas F. Cash,et al.  Women's body images: The results of a national survey in the U.S.A. , 1995 .

[11]  R. Janoff-Bulman,et al.  Viewpoint: The Dilemma of Self-Advocacy for Women: Another Case of Blaming the Victim? , 1996 .

[12]  Jennifer Paff Ogle,et al.  Interactions Among High School Cross‐Country Runners and Coaches: Creating a Cultural Context for Athletes' Embodied Experiences , 2006 .

[13]  D. Tannen You just don't understand: women and men in conversation. morrow , 1990 .

[14]  A. Eagly Sex differences in social behavior : a social-role interpretation , 1987 .

[15]  L. Miller,et al.  Should I Brag? Nature and Impact of Positive and Boastful Disclosures for Women and Men , 1992 .

[16]  J. Rodin,et al.  Women and weight: a normative discontent. , 1985, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[17]  A. Eagly,et al.  Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. , 1989 .

[18]  S. Murray You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation , 1992 .

[19]  R. Browne Rituals and ceremonies in popular culture , 1980 .

[20]  L. Ross,et al.  The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others , 2002 .

[21]  Esther Thorson,et al.  Perceived Persuasive Effects of Product Commercials and Public Service Announcements , 1992 .