Predicting Blood Pressure Response to Fluid Bolus Therapy Using Attention-Based Neural Networks for Clinical Interpretability

Determining whether hypotensive patients in intensive care units (ICUs) should receive fluid bolus therapy (FBT) has been an extremely challenging task for intensive care physicians as the corresponding increase in blood pressure has been hard to predict. Our study utilized regression models and attention-based recurrent neural network (RNN) algorithms and a multi-clinical information system large-scale database to build models that can predict the successful response to FBT among hypotensive patients in ICUs. We investigated both time-aggregated modeling using logistic regression algorithms with regularization and time-series modeling using the long short term memory network (LSTM) and the gated recurrent units network (GRU) with the attention mechanism for clinical interpretability. Among all modeling strategies, the stacked LSTM with the attention mechanism yielded the most predictable model with the highest accuracy of 0.852 and area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.925. The study results may help identify hypotensive patients in ICUs who will have sufficient blood pressure recovery after FBT.

[1]  M. Cecconi,et al.  Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study , 2015, Intensive Care Medicine.

[2]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBLINEAR: A Library for Large Linear Classification , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[3]  R G Mark,et al.  MIMIC II: a massive temporal ICU patient database to support research in intelligent patient monitoring , 2002, Computers in Cardiology.

[4]  Bennett P deBoisblanc,et al.  Response to fluid boluses in the fluid and catheter treatment trial. , 2015, Chest.

[5]  Didier Payen,et al.  A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure , 2008, Critical care.

[6]  R. Mark,et al.  Association between fluid balance and survival in critically ill patients , 2015, Journal of internal medicine.

[7]  C. Sprung,et al.  Sepsis in European intensive care units: Results of the SOAP study* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[8]  Andrew D Bersten,et al.  Post Resusicitation Fluid Boluses in Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock: Prevalence and Efficacy (Price Study) , 2013, Shock.

[9]  Giuseppe Natalini,et al.  Prediction of arterial pressure increase after fluid challenge , 2012, BMC Anesthesiology.

[10]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Long Short-Term Memory , 1997, Neural Computation.

[11]  Glenn M Eastwood,et al.  Physiological changes after fluid bolus therapy in sepsis: a systematic review of contemporary data , 2014, Critical Care.

[12]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate , 2014, ICLR.

[13]  Hollmann D. Aya,et al.  What is the impact of the fluid challenge technique on diagnosis of fluid responsiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, Critical Care.

[14]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder–Decoder Approaches , 2014, SSST@EMNLP.

[15]  Andrew Rhodes,et al.  Effects of fluid administration on arterial load in septic shock patients , 2015, Intensive Care Medicine.

[16]  Peter Szolovits,et al.  MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database , 2016, Scientific Data.