Stakeholder perceptions and involvement in the implementation of EMS in ports in Vietnam and Cambodia

Abstract To tackle environmental issues and ensure compliance with regulations, three ports in Vietnam and two ports in Cambodia implemented an Environmental Management System (EMS). The first steps of the EMS were completed during the period 2006–2007, with the establishment of the Port Environmental Policy, the Register of Environmental Aspects and an EMS Programme. Priorities in environmental protection have been identified for each of the ports. The initial assessment of the EMS, based on the documented EMS, was completed by experts from the ECOPORT Foundation, who issued a Port Environmental Review System (PERS) certificate for the ports. This paper presents an assessment of the implementation of the EMS through the eyes of various groups of port stakeholders. The second focus is on the manner of involving stakeholders in the EMS process, which has stakeholder participation as one of its core principles. The assessment was done via interviews with the environmental coordinators or managers at each port, as well as key port stakeholders. Eight groups of stakeholders are identified and classified into internal/external and voluntary/involuntary categories. Their salience is then assessed based on their legitimacy, power, urgency and proximity. The findings show that while ports are perceived as sources of environmental problems, they are also seen as important economic powerhouses. EMS is therefore needed at the ports to ensure their environmental performance is in line with their economic contribution. However, ports generally view other stakeholders as outsiders and exclude them from the process of designing environmental protection measures. Even though the stakeholders are strongly interested in contributing more to the process, there is no concrete plan for involving them in the management of the port.

[1]  H Journee,et al.  Survey on environmental monitoring requirements of European ports. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  C. Harris,et al.  Environmental management: A Study of Vietnamese Hotels , 2006 .

[3]  Charles J. Corbett,et al.  INTERNATIONAL DIFFUSION OF ISO 14000 CERTIFICATION , 2001 .

[4]  Brent Doberstein,et al.  EIA models and capacity building in Viet Nam: an analysis of development aid programs , 2004 .

[5]  R. Calantone,et al.  Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance , 2003 .

[6]  Michael Paddon,et al.  Linking strategic environmental assessment (SEA) and city development strategy in Vietnam , 2008 .

[7]  Charles Hostovsky,et al.  The role of public involvement in environmental impact assessment in Vietnam: towards a more culturally sensitive approach , 2010 .

[8]  Julia Roloff,et al.  Learning from Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management , 2008 .

[9]  Scott A. Fritzen Probing System Limits: Decentralisation and Local Political Accountability in Vietnam , 2006 .

[10]  D. Dillman,et al.  EFFECTS OF QUESTIONNAIRE LENGTH, RESPONDENT-FRIENDLY DESIGN, AND A DIFFICULT QUESTION ON RESPONSE RATES FOR OCCUPANT-ADDRESSED CENSUS MAIL SURVEYS , 1993 .

[11]  Agus Sudaryanto,et al.  Asia-Pacific mussel watch: monitoring contamination of persistent organochlorine compounds in coastal waters of Asian countries. , 2003, Marine pollution bulletin.

[12]  Jung Wan Lee,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment, Exchange Rate, and Their Roles in Economic Growth of Developing Countries: Empirical Evidence from Kazakhstan , 2010 .

[13]  M. Clarkson A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[14]  M. Ingle,et al.  Community-based environmental management in Vietnam: the challenge of sharing power in a politically guided society† , 2007 .

[15]  C. Driscoll,et al.  The Primordial Stakeholder: Advancing the Conceptual Consideration of Stakeholder Status for the Natural Environment , 2004 .

[16]  H. Harino,et al.  Concentrations of organotin compounds in sediment and clams collected from coastal areas in Vietnam. , 2004, Environmental pollution.

[17]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[18]  C. Wooldridge,et al.  Environmental management of ports and harbours -- implementation of policy through scientific monitoring , 1999 .

[19]  Mark Pagell,et al.  How Plant Managers' Experiences and Attitudes Toward Sustainability Relate to Operational Performance , 2009 .

[20]  Philippe Le Billon,et al.  The Political Ecology of Transition in Cambodia 1989–1999: War, Peace and Forest Exploitation , 2000 .

[21]  Pratima Bansal,et al.  Seeing the need for ISO 14001 , 2003 .

[22]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  A framework for sustainable port planning in inland ports: a multistakeholder approach , 2003 .

[23]  Jeremy Shires,et al.  Estimating the robustness of questionnaire results: lessons from a mixed-mode survey of expectations for tele-working and road-based business travel , 2008 .

[24]  M. Javad Paknejad,et al.  Environmental versus quality standards ‐ an overview and comparison , 1997 .

[25]  Margaret Slocomb The Nature and Role of Ideology in the Modern Cambodian State , 2006, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies.

[26]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  Client/customer or stakeholder focus? ISO 14000 EMS as a construction industry case study , 2000 .

[27]  Abbass F. Alkhafaji A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Governance: Managing in a Dynamic Environment , 1989 .

[28]  V. Maclaren,et al.  Community concerns about landfills: A case study of Hanoi, Vietnam , 2005 .

[29]  Olivier Boiral,et al.  Corporate Greening Through ISO 14001: A Rational Myth? , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[30]  M. Marschke,et al.  Learning for sustainability: participatory resource management in Cambodian fishing villages. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[31]  Gina Solomon,et al.  Pollution prevention at ports: clearing the air , 2004 .

[32]  B. Campbell,et al.  Pro‐poor payments for environmental services: Challenges for the government and administrative agencies in Vietnam , 2008 .

[33]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[34]  Perry Sadorsky,et al.  The Relationship Between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance , 1999 .

[35]  C. Prell,et al.  Unpacking “Participation” in the Adaptive Management of Social–ecological Systems: a Critical Review , 2006 .

[36]  E. Tzannatos Ship emissions and their externalities for the port of Piraeus – Greece , 2010 .

[37]  Frank Wiengarten,et al.  ISO 14000 certification and investments in environmental supply chain management practices: identifying differences in motivation and adoption levels between Western European and North American companies , 2013 .

[38]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Sensitive Topics and Reluctant Respondents Demonstrating a Link between Nonresponse Bias and Measurement Error , 2010 .

[39]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  Stakeholder involvement in the EMS adoption process , 2003, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[40]  Eleanor Singer,et al.  CONFIDENTIALITY ASSURANCES AND RESPONSE A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW OF THE EXPERIMENTAL LITERATURE , 1995 .

[41]  A. Griffiths,et al.  The natural environment as a primary stakeholder: the case of climate change , 2009 .

[42]  Frank L. Montabon,et al.  ISO 14000: Assessing Its Perceived Impact on Corporate Performance , 2000 .

[43]  J Casal,et al.  The Self Diagnosis Method. A new methodology to assess environmental management in sea ports. , 2004, Marine pollution bulletin.

[44]  Dao Minh Chau Administrative Reform in Vietnam: Need and Strategy , 1997 .

[45]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[46]  Ravi Subramanian,et al.  An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm , 2010 .

[47]  R. Groves Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys , 2006 .

[48]  M. Pedrono,et al.  An evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system in Vietnam: The gap between theory and practice , 2011 .

[49]  S. Seuring,et al.  Core issues in sustainable supply chain management – a Delphi study , 2008 .

[50]  Shannon K. Gilmartin,et al.  Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys , 2003 .

[51]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  INTEGRATED CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND ILLUSTRATIVE CASES , 2004 .