Breaking blades: Experimental programme on intentional fracturing systems of lithic tools

This research represents a first approach to the characterization of blade fractures produced intentionally using various techniques, according to an experimental protocol. The objective is to establish a reference base of marks which serve to define the fractures documented in the archaeological record. The fractured blade being a very common element in different sites throughout in the Iberian Peninsula during the Neolithic and Chalcolithic Ages. In fact, from the Late Neolithic a new concept applied to the creation of lithic tools arose, involving the fracturing of blades through the improvement of fracturing techniques. In addition, a preference for obtaining the mesial fragments of the blades or those which have more regular measurements can be observed. This type of lithic instrument represents high percentages of all the retouched material, and may possess only one fractured end or, more commonly, both, bi-fractured. With the archaeological evidence, we decided to carry out an experiment to define and classify the marks that result during the intentional fracturing of laminar fragments, contemplating different variables. We used three types of techniques for fracturing blades: flex, direct percussion and indirect percussion, and we used different types of hammer, made of stone, antler and copper. For the results, we have standardized the descriptions of different parts of the fracture distinguishing: types of fracture, fracture planes, fracture marks and macrowear. However, we should point out that this experimentation is the beginning of a line of research that, over time, must integrate a wider experimental base which also considers the other mentioned causes of fracture, as well as the functional objective of these tools. The preliminary study through this experimentation has made it possible to define and describe the types of fractures resulting from the use of different blade fracturing methods. We also have described the main types of fracture marks generated from each fracturing technique.

[1]  María Celeste Weitzel,et al.  Trampling fragmentation potential of lithic artifacts: an experimental approach , 2014 .

[2]  Celeste Weitzel Cuentan los fragmentos. Clasificación y causas de fractura de artefactos formatizados por talla , 2012 .

[3]  Rafael Garrido Peña,et al.  Campaniforme y conflicto social: Evidencias del yacimiento de Humanejos (Parla, Madrid) , 2012 .

[4]  Jacques Pelegrin,et al.  New Experimental Observations for the Characterization of Pressure Blade Production Techniques , 2012 .

[5]  Celeste Weitzel Rotura intencional de artefactos líticos formatizados en la Región Pampeana bonaerense , 2011 .

[6]  Thomas A. Jennings,et al.  Experimental production of bending and radial flake fractures and implications for lithic technologies , 2011 .

[7]  A. Rodríguez,et al.  Primeras experimentaciones sobre la producción laminar del Neolítico Reciente-Edad del Cobre del sur de la Península Ibérica , 2007 .

[8]  Christopher Lintz,et al.  The Spreen Cache: A Case Study of a Prehistoric Curated Collection of Broken Tools from 41RN108, Runnels County, Texas , 2002 .

[9]  C. Ellis,et al.  Evidence for Late Paleoindian Ritual from the Caradoc Site (AfHj-104), Southwestern Ontario, Canada , 2001, American Antiquity.

[10]  John C. Whittaker,et al.  Flintknapping: Making and Understanding Stone Tools , 1994 .

[11]  J. Muñoz Las industrias líticas del Neolítico en Andalucía, sus implicaciones espaciales y económicas , 1988 .

[12]  Javier Fortea Pérez,et al.  La industria lítica tallada del neolítico antiguo en la vertiente mediterránea de la península ibérica , 1987 .

[13]  Federico Bernaldo de Quirós Guidotti,et al.  Proyecto de análisis técnico para las industrias líticas , 1981 .

[14]  B. Bradley,et al.  Folsom Tools and Technology at the Hanson Site, Wyoming , 1980 .

[15]  C. Aschero,et al.  Ensayo para una clasificación morfológica de artefactos líticos aplicada a estudios tipológicos comparativos , 1975 .