Coproduction of district heat and electricity or biomotor fuels

The operation of a district heating system depends on the heat load demand, which varies throughout the year. In this paper, we analyze the coproduction of district heat and electricity or biomotor fuels. We demonstrate how three different taxation scenarios and two crude oil price levels influence the selection of production units to minimize the district heat production cost and calculate the resulting primary energy use. Our analysis is based on the annual measured heat load of a district heating system. The minimum-cost district heat production system comprises different production units that meet the district heat demand and simultaneously minimize the district heat production cost. First, we optimize the cost of a district heat production system based on the cogeneration of electricity and heat with and without biomass integrated gasification combined-cycle technology. We considered cogenerated electricity as a byproduct with the value of that produced by a condensing power plant. Next, we integrate and optimize different biomotor fuel production units into the district heat production system by considering biomotor fuels as byproducts that can substitute for fossil motor fuels. We demonstrate that in district heating systems, the strengthening of environmental taxation reduces the dependence on fossil fuels. However, increases in environmental taxation and the crude oil price do not necessarily influence the production cost of district heat as long as biomass price is not driven by policy measures. Biomotor fuel production in a district heating system is typically not cost-efficient. The biomotor fuels produced from the district heating system have to compete with those from standalone biomotor fuel plants and also with its fossil-based counterparts. This is also true for high oil prices. A carbon tax on fossil CO2 emissions based on social cost damage will increase the competitiveness of biomass-based combined heat and power plants, especially for BIGCC technology with its high electricity-to-heat ratio.

[1]  Simon Harvey,et al.  Opportunities for integration of biofuel gasifiers in natural-gas combined heat-and-power plants in district-heating systems , 2006 .

[2]  Erik O. Ahlgren,et al.  Assessment of integration of different biomass gasification alternatives in a district-heating system , 2009 .

[3]  Martin Börjesson,et al.  Biomass gasification in cost-optimized district heating systems — A regional modelling analysis , 2010 .

[4]  Luis M. Serra,et al.  Polygeneration and efficient use of natural resources , 2009 .

[5]  John Davison,et al.  Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2 , 2007 .

[6]  R.W.R. Zwart,et al.  High efficient co-production of Fischer-Tropsch (FT) transportation fuels and Substitute Natural Gas (SNG) from biomass , 2004 .

[7]  B. Metz.  IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[8]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  Sustainable vehicle fuels - do they exist? , 2009 .

[9]  Kamel Bennaceur,et al.  CO2 Capture and Storage: A Key Carbon Abatement Option , 2008 .

[10]  Sylvain Leduc,et al.  Location of a biomass based methanol production plant: A dynamic problem in northern Sweden , 2010 .

[11]  M. Thring.  World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[12]  Jan Brandin,et al.  The technical feasibility of biomass gasification for hydrogen production , 2005 .

[13]  W. Nordhaus.  The "Stern Review" on the Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[14]  André Faaij,et al.  Outlook for advanced biofuels , 2006 .

[15]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage. Part A: Review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies , 2006 .

[16]  Mats Söderström,et al.  Biomass gasification opportunities in a district heating system , 2010 .

[17]  P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Biofuel Support Policies in Europe: Lessons Learnt for the Long Way Ahead , 2009 .

[18]  Thore Berntsson,et al.  Biofuel gasification combined heat and power—new implementation opportunities resulting from combined supply of process steam and district heating , 2004 .

[19]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Using biomass for climate change mitigation and oil use reduction , 2007 .

[20]  Mats Söderström,et al.  Biomass gasification in district heating systems - The effect of economic energy policies , 2010 .

[21]  A. Bridgwater.  The technical and economic feasibility of biomass gasification for power generation , 1995 .

[22]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Primary energy implications of end-use energy efficiency measures in district heated buildings , 2011 .