Contribution of off-road tests to predicting on-road performance: a critical review of tests.

BACKGROUND/AIM Driving is an essential activity of daily living. Because it is easily disrupted by illness or injury, it is a common subject of occupational therapy assessment. Assessments of driving are critically important and carry legal implications for therapists. A full occupational therapy assessment comprising both off- and on-road testing is time and labour intensive and therefore expensive. Off-road tests are used to inform on-road assessments, and, if they have sufficient sensitivity and specificity they may replace an on-road assessment for some clients. The twofold purpose of this article is to compare and critique off-road tests to predict driving performance and to determine if any is sufficiently accurate to identify drivers who do not require an on-road assessment. METHODS We reviewed tests commonly used by researchers to predict driving capacity (i) that have been used in research since 2000 and (ii) for which sensitivity and specificity had been (or could be) calculated. We compared the tests on five characteristics: diagnostic makeup of samples, sample sizes, outcome measures, sensitivity and specificity and potential for use as a supplement to on-road assessment or to identify drivers for whom an on-road assessment is not necessary. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS No gold standard off-road test exists for predicting on road performance. DriveSafe/DriveAware and SMC Tests had the highest reported sensitivity and specificity. Thus, with further research, one or both may be found to predict on-road performance accurately and to minimise the need for on road assessment. Several other tests are a useful supplement to on-road testing.

[1]  Hsiu-Chen Huang,et al.  Predictive validity of driving-simulator assessments following traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study , 2005, Brain injury.

[2]  R. Colarusso Mvpt-3: Motor-Free Visual Perception Test , 2003 .

[3]  Nicol Korner-Bitensky,et al.  The DriveABLE Competence Screen as a predictor of on-road driving in a clinical sample. , 2009, Australian occupational therapy journal.

[4]  Andy H. Lee,et al.  Identifying older drivers at risk of traffic violations by using a driving simulator: a 3-year longitudinal study. , 2005, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[5]  C. Owsley,et al.  The useful field of view test: a new technique for evaluating age-related declines in visual function. , 1993, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[6]  M K Janke,et al.  AGE-RELATED DISABILITIES THAT MAY IMPAIR DRIVING AND THEIR ASSESSMENT: LITERATURE REVIEW. , 1994 .

[7]  M. Oswanski,et al.  Evaluation of Two Assessment Tools in Predicting Driving Ability of Senior Drivers , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[8]  Andy H. Lee,et al.  Using a driving simulator to identify older drivers at inflated risk of motor vehicle crashes. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[9]  Lynnette G. Kay,et al.  Predicting fitness to drive using the visual recognition slide test (USyd). , 2008, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[10]  Neil Frude,et al.  The use of a cognitive battery to predict who will fail an on-road driving test. , 2004, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[11]  W. Brouwer,et al.  Fitness to drive in older drivers with cognitive impairment , 2000, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[12]  M K Janke,et al.  Assessing medically impaired older drivers in a licensing agency setting. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  D. Roth,et al.  Relation of Useful Field of View and other Screening Tests to on-Road Driving Performance , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  Carolyn A. Unsworth,et al.  Review of tests contributing to the occupational therapy off-road driver assessment , 2005 .

[15]  Gayla M. Cissell,et al.  Can High‐Risk Older Drivers Be Identified Through Performance‐Based Measures in a Department of Motor Vehicles Setting? , 2006, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[16]  C. Snellgrove Cognitive Screening for the Safe Driving Competence of Older People with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Early Dementia , 2005 .

[17]  J. DeLuca,et al.  Driving Behaviors Following Brain Injury: Self‐Report and Motor Vehicle Records , 2002, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[18]  Marlos Viana,et al.  SHORT NOTE Relative Effects of Age and Compromised Vision on Driving Performance , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[19]  B. Gerdle,et al.  Neuropsychological aspects of driving after a stroke—in the simulator and on the road , 2000 .

[20]  Desiree N. Lanford,et al.  Validity and critical driving errors of on-road assessment for older drivers. , 2010, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[21]  Kaarin J Anstey,et al.  A Multidomain Approach for Predicting Older Driver Safety Under In‐Traffic Road Conditions , 2008, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[22]  M. White,et al.  Visual testing for readiness to drive after stroke: a multicenter study. , 2000, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[23]  Barbara Mazer,et al.  Validity of the Cognitive Behavioral Driver's Inventory in predicting driving outcome. , 2006, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[24]  Scott R Millis,et al.  Predictors of driving outcome after traumatic brain injury. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  P. Atchley,et al.  The role of visual attention in predicting driving impairment in older adults. , 2005, Psychology and aging.

[26]  R. Reitan Trail Making Test: Manual for Administration and Scoring , 1992 .

[27]  M Keller,et al.  Fitness to Drive with Neurological Disabilities , 2003, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[28]  Pierre Joly,et al.  Executive Functions in the Evaluation of Accident Risk of Older Drivers , 2002, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[29]  Lynnette G. Kay,et al.  Predicting fitness to drive in people with cognitive impairments by using DriveSafe and DriveAware. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  Maria T. Schultheis,et al.  The Neurocognitive Driving Test: Applying Technology to the Assessment of Driving Ability Following Brain Injury , 2003 .

[31]  William C Mann,et al.  Predictability of clinical assessments for driving performance. , 2008, Journal of safety research.

[32]  Malcolm Man-Son-Hing,et al.  Clinical Utility of Office‐Based Cognitive Predictors of Fitness to Drive in Persons with Dementia: A Systematic Review , 2006, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[33]  M. Critchley The parietal lobes , 1966 .

[34]  Andy H. Lee,et al.  Assessing the driving performance of older adult drivers: on-road versus simulated driving. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[35]  Josée Duquette,et al.  Impact of partial administration of the Cognitive Behavioral Driver's Inventory on concurrent validity for people with brain injury. , 2010, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[36]  Tim J. Anderson,et al.  Sensory-motor and cognitive tests predict driving ability of persons with brain disorders , 2007, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[37]  Cynthia Owsley Clinical and Research Issues on Older Drivers: Future Directions , 1997, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.

[38]  Dale Andrea,et al.  Influence of chronic illness on crash involvement of motor vehicle drivers: 2nd edition , 2010 .

[39]  Barbara Freund,et al.  Evaluating Driving Performance of Cognitively Impaired and Healthy Older Adults: A Pilot Study Comparing On‐Road Testing and Driving Simulation , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[40]  D. Roth,et al.  Cumulative Meta-analysis of the Relationship Between Useful Field of View and Driving Performance in Older Adults: Current and Future Implications , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.