Numerical computations of steady and unsteady flow in bended pipes

The steady and pulsative turbulent flows in curved pipes have been computed with two different modeling approaches; the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) technique and Large Eddy Simulations (LES). The results from computations of the flow in a single bended pipe have been compared to experimental data. The comparisons show poor agreement for the RANS technique at the exit of the bend, while the LES computations show better agreement with the measured velocity profiles. LES in contrast to RANS, can also provide much more details about the dynamics of the flow. It is also shown that small uncertainties in the inlet boundary conditions can result in significant variations in the flow field. Different types of small amplitude secondary flow at the inlet affect the flow downstream of the bend. The approach enables one to state that for the experiments under consideration the lack of data on the secondary flow prevents a direct validation of the LES results. The pulsatile flow in a double bended pipe has also been investigated and the vortex cores are visualized to enable a better insight into the unsteady flow field and the effects of the inflow pulsations. (Less)

[1]  R. M. C. So,et al.  Perturbation by and recovery from bend curvature of a fully developed turbulent pipe flow , 1989 .

[2]  John E. Dec,et al.  Time-Resolved Velocities and Turbulence in the Oscillating Flow of a Pulse Combustor Tail Pipe* , 1991 .

[3]  A. Hilgenstock,et al.  Analysis of installation effects by means of computational fluid dynamics—CFD vs experiments? , 1996 .

[4]  Wiendelt Steenbergen,et al.  The rate of decay of swirl in turbulent pipe flow , 1998 .

[5]  Kozo Sudo,et al.  Experimental investigation on turbulent flow through a circular-sectioned 180° bend , 2000 .

[6]  Bodo Mickan,et al.  Systematic investigation of pipe flows and installation effects using laser Doppler anemometry—Part II. The effect of disturbed flow profiles on turbine gas meters—a describing empirical model , 1996 .

[7]  P. Holmes,et al.  The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in the Analysis of Turbulent Flows , 1993 .

[8]  Jack Legrand,et al.  Numerical investigation of bend and torus flows, part I : effect of swirl motion on flow structure in U-bend , 2004 .

[9]  H. Sugiyama,et al.  Numerical analysis of developing turbulent flow in a 180° bend tube by an algebraic Reynolds stress model , 2005 .

[10]  M. Meinke,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of low frequency oscillations of the Dean vortices in turbulent pipe bend flows , 2005 .

[11]  Mohammad Hassan Saidi,et al.  Numerical analysis of turbulent swirling decay pipe flow , 2005 .

[12]  Jinhee Jeong,et al.  On the identification of a vortex , 1995, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  Bodo Mickan,et al.  Systematic investigation of pipe flows and installation effects using laser Doppler anemometry—Part I. Profile measurements downstream of several pipe configurations and flow conditioners , 1996 .

[14]  Stanley A. Berger,et al.  Fully developed pulsatile flow in a curved pipe , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  T. T. Yeh,et al.  Effects of pipe elbows and tube bundles on selected types of flowmeters , 1991 .

[16]  B. R. Ramaprian,et al.  Fully developed periodic turbulent pipe flow. Part 2. The detailed structure of the flow , 1983, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Hector Iacovides,et al.  The computation of flow development through stationary and rotating U-ducts of strong curvature , 1996 .