Assessment with computer agents that engage in conversational dialogues and trialogues with learners

This article describes conversation-based assessments with computer agents that interact with humans through chat, talking heads, or embodied animated avatars. Some of these agents perform actions, interact with multimedia, hold conversations with humans in natural language, and adaptively respond to a persons actions, verbal contributions, and emotions. Data are logged throughout the interactions in order to assess the individuals mastery of subject matters, skills, and proficiencies on both cognitive and noncognitive characteristics. There are different agent-based designs that focus on learning and assessment. Dialogues occur between one agent and one human, as in the case of intelligent tutoring systems. Three-party conversations, called trialogues, involve two agents interacting with a human. The two agents can take on different roles (such as tutors and peers), model actions and social interactions, stage arguments, solicit help from the human, and collaboratively solve problems. Examples of assessment with these agent-based environments are presented in the context of intelligent tutoring, educational games, and interventions to help struggling adult readers. Most of these involve assessment at varying grain sizes to guide the intelligent interaction, but conversation-based assessment with agents is also currently being used in high stakes assessments. Computer agents interact with humans in dialogues and trialogues with two agents.Intelligent agents reliably analyze many but not all aspects of natural language.Human tutoring has systematic discourse patterns that can be simulated by agents.Intelligent tutoring systems with agents improve learning of difficult content.Computer agents are used in conversation-based formative and summative assessments.

[1]  K. VanLehn The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems , 2011 .

[2]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  When Are Tutorial Dialogues More Effective Than Reading? , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1982 .

[4]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  AutoTutor and Family: A Review of 17 Years of Natural Language Tutoring , 2014, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[5]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  AutoTutor and affective autotutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back , 2012, TIIS.

[6]  R. Almond,et al.  Focus Article: On the Structure of Educational Assessments , 2003 .

[7]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  The ACODEA framework: Developing segmentation and classification schemes for fully automatic analysis of online discussions , 2012, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[8]  A. Graesser,et al.  Confusion can be beneficial for learning. , 2014 .

[9]  James H. Martin,et al.  Speech and language processing: an introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition, 2nd Edition , 2000, Prentice Hall series in artificial intelligence.

[10]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Inducing and Tracking Confusion with Contradictions during Complex Learning , 2013, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[11]  Lei Liu,et al.  A Tough Nut to Crack: Measuring Collaborative Problem Solving , 2016 .

[12]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  Understanding students' performance in a computer-based assessment of complex problem solving: An analysis of behavioral data from computer-generated log files , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Aplicaciones del diálogo humano de tutoría al autotutor: un sistema inteligente de tutoría , 2006 .

[14]  V. Shute,et al.  Stealth Assessment: Measuring and Supporting Learning in Video Games , 2013 .

[15]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Improving the Efficiency of Dialogue in Tutoring. , 2012 .

[16]  Hercules Dalianis,et al.  Applied Natural Language Processing: Identification, Investigation and Resolution , 2011 .

[17]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Instruction Based on Tutoring , 2010 .

[18]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Context-Based Speech Act Classification in Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2014, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[19]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Tactical Language and Culture Training Systems: Using AI to Teach Foreign Languages and Cultures , 2009, AI Mag..

[20]  Keith K. Millis,et al.  Operation ARA: A computerized learning game that teaches critical thinking and scientific reasoning , 2012 .

[21]  Patrick Griffin,et al.  Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills : methods and approach , 2015 .

[22]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Handbook of latent semantic analysis , 2007 .

[23]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Multimodal semi-automated affect detection from conversational cues, gross body language, and facial features , 2010, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[24]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Improving Adolescent Students' Reading Comprehension with Istart , 2006 .

[25]  G. T. Jackson,et al.  Motivation and performance in a game-based intelligent tutoring system , 2013 .

[26]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Pragmatics and Pedagogy: Conversational Rules and Politeness Strategies May Inhibit Effective Tutoring , 1995 .

[27]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix: List of Tables , 2014 .

[28]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Trialog: How Peer Collaboration Helps Remediate Errors in an ITS , 2008, FLAIRS Conference.

[29]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Conversations with AutoTutor Help Students Learn , 2016, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[30]  Jonathan Templin,et al.  Diagnostic Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications , 2010 .

[31]  Nia Dowell,et al.  Does it really matter whether students' contributions are spoken versus typed in an intelligent tutoring system with natural language? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[32]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  Automated Communication Analysis of Teams , 2008 .

[33]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  The Impact of Game-Like Features on Learning from an Intelligent Tutoring System , 2017, Technol. Knowl. Learn..

[34]  Brent Morgan,et al.  Exploring the deep-level reasoning questions effect during vicarious learning among eighth to eleventh graders in the domains of computer literacy and Newtonian physics , 2009 .

[35]  M. Wish,et al.  Speech act theory in quantitative research on interpersonal behavior , 1985 .

[36]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science-Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[37]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[38]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  The Measurement of Textual Coherence with Latent Semantic Analysis. , 1998 .

[39]  Sidney K. D'Mello,et al.  Dialogue Modes in Expert Tutoring , 2008, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[40]  Candice Burkett,et al.  Self-regulated Learning with MetaTutor: Advancing the Science of Learning with MetaCognitive Tools , 2010 .

[41]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Instruction Based on Cooperative Learning , 2010 .

[42]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Reading Comprehension Lessons in AutoTutor for the Center for the Study of Adult Literacy , 2016 .

[43]  P. Griffin,et al.  Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving in Education Environments , 2016 .

[44]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Tactical Language and Culture Training Systems: Using Artificial Intelligence to Teach Foreign Languages and Cultures , 2008, AAAI.

[45]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[46]  K. VanLehn,et al.  Scaffolding Deep Comprehension Strategies Through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART , 2005 .

[47]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring , 1995 .

[48]  Takashi Yamauchi,et al.  Learning from human tutoring , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[49]  Andrew Olney,et al.  Student Speech Act Classification Using Machine Learning , 2011, FLAIRS.

[50]  Friedrich W. Hesse,et al.  A Framework for Teachable Collaborative Problem Solving Skills , 2015 .

[51]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  Assessing Collaborative Problem Solving Through Automated Technologies , 2014 .

[52]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Measuring Self-Regulated Learning Skills through Social Interactions in a teachable Agent Environment , 2010, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[53]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Sharing Solutions: Persistence and Grounding in Multimodal Collaborative Problem Solving , 2006 .

[54]  A. Graesser,et al.  Question Asking During Tutoring , 1994 .

[55]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Using LSA in AutoTutor: Learning through mixed-initiative dialogue in natural language. , 2007 .

[56]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Utterance Classification in AutoTutor , 2003, HLT-NAACL 2003.

[57]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Learning by Communicating in Natural Language With Conversational Agents , 2014 .

[58]  Heather H. Mitchell,et al.  AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[59]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  The Behavior of Tutoring Systems , 2006, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[60]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Guru: A Computer Tutor That Models Expert Human Tutors , 2012, ITS.

[61]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Recent Advances in Conversational Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2013, AI Mag..

[62]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Agent Technologies Designed to Facilitate Interactive Knowledge Construction , 2008 .

[63]  Jonathan P. Rowe,et al.  Integrating Learning, Problem Solving, and Engagement in Narrative-Centered Learning Environments , 2011, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[64]  Wayne H. Ward,et al.  My Science Tutor: A Conversational Multimedia Virtual Tutor. , 2013 .

[65]  Brent Morgan,et al.  Automating the Mentor in a Serious Game: A Discourse Analysis Using Finite State Machines , 2013, HCI.