What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review

[1]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2013 .

[2]  D. Gough,et al.  Clarifying differences between review designs and methods , 2012, Systematic Reviews.

[3]  Jo Rycroft-Malone,et al.  Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research , 2012, Implementation Science.

[4]  Sylwia Męcfal Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[5]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Understanding the relationship between the perceived characteristics of clinical practice guidelines and their uptake: protocol for a realist review , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[6]  Karen Ritchie,et al.  A guide to synthesising qualitative research for researchers undertaking health technology assessments and systematic reviews , 2011 .

[7]  J. Higgins Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .

[8]  Pamela Mazzocato,et al.  Lean thinking in healthcare: a realist review of the literature , 2010, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[9]  Michele Tarsilla Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[10]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances , 2010, BMC medical education.

[11]  David Moher,et al.  An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  James Thomas,et al.  Bmc Medical Research Methodology Methods for the Synthesis of Qualitative Research: a Critical Review , 2022 .

[13]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Can We Systematically Review Studies That Evaluate Complex Interventions? , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[14]  Maria J Grant,et al.  A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.

[15]  P. Pluye,et al.  A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. , 2009, International journal of nursing studies.

[16]  S. Straus,et al.  Knowledge translation in health care : moving from evidence to practice , 2009 .

[17]  A. Harden,et al.  Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.

[18]  Mike Weed,et al.  A Potential Method for the Interpretive Synthesis of Qualitative Research: Issues in the Development of ‘Meta-Interpretation’ , 2008 .

[19]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist review to understand the efficacy of school feeding programmes , 2007, British medical journal.

[20]  Catherine Law,et al.  Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[21]  P. Tugwell,et al.  School feeding for improving the physical and psychosocial health of disadvantaged elementary school children. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[22]  P. Tugwell,et al.  School feeding for improving the physical and psychosocial health of disadvantaged students , 2006 .

[23]  S. Straus,et al.  Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? , 2006, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[24]  M. Dixon-Woods,et al.  Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups , 2006 .

[25]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  A Synthesis of Research Addressing Children's, Young People's and Parents' Views of Walking and Cycling for Transport. , 2006 .

[26]  J. Popay,et al.  Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in sytematic reviews , 2006 .

[27]  Roland M. Grad,et al.  Impact of clinical information-retrieval technology on physicians: A literature review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[28]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[29]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[30]  J. Popay,et al.  Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[31]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .

[32]  Working with Students as Researchers: Ethical Issues of a Participatory Process , 2005 .

[33]  M. Weed "Meta Interpretation": A Method for the Interpretive Synthesis of Qualitative Research , 2005 .

[34]  Mary Dixon-Woods,et al.  Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[35]  Margarete Sandelowski,et al.  Creating Metasummaries of Qualitative Findings , 2003, Nursing research.

[36]  Keith R Abrams,et al.  Factors affecting uptake of childhood immunisation: a Bayesian synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence , 2002, The Lancet.

[37]  Sally Thorne,et al.  Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research: A Practical Guide to Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis , 2001 .

[38]  Steven E. Stemler,et al.  An Overview of Content Analysis. , 2001 .

[39]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Reviewing the reviewers: the quality of reporting in three secondary journals. , 2001, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[40]  Sally Thorne,et al.  Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research , 2001 .

[41]  K R Abrams,et al.  Bayesian methods in meta-analysis and evidence synthesis. , 2001, Statistical methods in medical research.

[42]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[43]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[44]  B. Paterson,et al.  Shifting images of chronic illness. , 1998, Image--the journal of nursing scholarship.

[45]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[46]  M Sandelowski,et al.  Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. , 1997, Research in nursing & health.

[47]  D. Cook,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[48]  Louise A. Jensen,et al.  Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Findings , 1996 .

[49]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[50]  E. Chelimsky,et al.  Cross-design Synthesis: A New Form of Meta-analysis for Combining Results from Randomized Clinical Trials and Medical-practice Databases , 1993, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[51]  F. Mosteller,et al.  A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. , 1992, JAMA.

[52]  G. Noblit,et al.  Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies , 1988 .

[53]  R. Yin,et al.  Using the Case Survey Method To Analyze Policy Studies. , 1975 .