A GIS-based system for allocating municipal solid waste incinerator compensatory fund.

To ease the NIMBY (not in my back yard) syndrome of constructing municipal solid waste (MSW) incinerators in Taiwan, compensatory funding is widely allocated to the impacted communities to gain the acceptance and support of residents living the impacted areas. This paper presents a spatial methodology for distributing a compensatory fund more logically based on the environmental impact on each neighborhood in Taipei City. This method integrates ten impact factors, which have been proposed by a local committee, to evaluate all neighborhoods using mathematical models combined with spatial analyses in an analytic hierarchy process. The compensatory fund is distributed according to the resulting final scores. A GIS (geographic information systems)-based system has been developed to assist in assigning the final scores to the neighborhoods impacted. Results on impact factors and fund distributions are combined; they are included in an information system and displayed in spatial scales. For Taipei City, the impact of air quality during the incinerator operating period is the item of greatest concern to the surrounding residents and thus, it receives a relatively higher weight of 0.2894. As a result, high impact scores were assigned to not only those neighborhoods hosting the incinerators, but also the neighborhoods where the maximum particulate air pollutants occurred. This approach could be applicable to other MSW incinerators with similar environmental impact problems and interest in compensation schemes.

[1]  R. C. Vaishya,et al.  Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Allahabad, India. , 2007, Waste management.

[2]  Alan C. Brent,et al.  Application of the analytical hierarchy process to establish health care waste management systems that minimise infection risks in developing countries , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Norman R. Scott,et al.  Siting analysis of farm-based centralized anaerobic digester systems for distributed generation using GIS , 2005 .

[4]  Kafeel Ahmad,et al.  WITHDRAWN: Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Allahabad, India. , 2006, Waste management.

[5]  L Morselli,et al.  Tools for evaluation of impact associated with MSW incineration: LCA and integrated environmental monitoring system. , 2005, Waste management.

[6]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[7]  Ann Y. Watson,et al.  Evaluating the health impacts of incinerator emissions , 1996 .

[8]  Shu-Hsiang Hsu,et al.  NIMBY opposition and solid waste incinerator siting in democratizing Taiwan , 2006 .

[9]  Z. Neeman,et al.  Effective Siting of Waste Treatment Facilities , 2002 .

[10]  William Ho,et al.  Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  David M. Rocke,et al.  A GIS-based approach to spatial allocation of area source solvent emissions , 2000, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning and Risk , 1991 .

[13]  D. Komilis,et al.  Siting MSW landfills with a spatial multiple criteria analysis methodology. , 2005, Waste management.

[14]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Michael L. Tierney Priority Setting and Resource Allocation. , 1981 .

[16]  F. Passarini,et al.  Application of an integrated environmental monitoring system to an incineration plant. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  R Ramanathan,et al.  A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  R. Ramanathan,et al.  Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages , 1994 .