3D Virtual World BPM Training Systems: Process Gateway Experimental Results

It is important for companies that their operational employees have profound knowledge of the processes in which their work is embedded. 3D virtual world (VW) environments are promising for learning, especially for complex processes that have deviations from the standard flow. We design a 3D VW process training environment to improve process learning, particularly for complex processes with alternative flows, represented with gateways in process models. We adopt the method of loci, which suggests the mental traversal of routines for improving learning. Our experiment with 145 participants compares the level of knowledge acquired for a sample process with our 3D VW environment and a 2D depiction. We found that the 3D VW environment significantly increases the level of process knowledge acquired across the typical gateways in processes. Our results contribute to our understanding of how individuals learn knowledge of processes via 3D environments. With a low initial investment, practitioners are encouraged to invest in 3D training systems for processes, since these can be set up once and reused multiple times for various employees.

[1]  Daniel M. Johnson,et al.  Design and evaluation of virtual environments mechanisms to support remote collaboration on complex process diagrams , 2017, Inf. Syst..

[2]  Alexandra Petrakou,et al.  Interacting through avatars: Virtual worlds as a context for online education , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Hajo A. Reijers,et al.  A 3D Visualization Approach for Process Training in Office Environments , 2016, OTM Conferences.

[4]  Michael K. Thomas,et al.  Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns , 2005 .

[5]  Jutta Stumpf-Wollersheim,et al.  The influence of process-oriented organisational design on operational performance and innovation: a quantitative analysis in the financial services industry , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[6]  Susanne Robra-Bissantz,et al.  An Immersive Memory Palace: Supporting the Method of Loci with Virtual Reality , 2017, AMCIS.

[7]  Mark Strembeck,et al.  The Influence of Notational Deficiencies on Process Model Comprehension , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Jan-Paul Huttner,et al.  The Role of Mental Factors for the Design of a Virtual Memory Palace , 2018, AMCIS.

[9]  R. Evans,et al.  Reliability of the "Draw-a-Man" test. , 1975 .

[10]  Michael Blumenstein,et al.  A Decade of Research on the Use of Three-Dimensional Virtual Worlds in Health Care: A Systematic Literature Review , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  J. Bailenson,et al.  The Effect of Interactivity on Learning Physical Actions in Virtual Reality , 2008 .

[12]  Youngkyun Baek,et al.  Exploring factors of media characteristic influencing flow in learning through virtual worlds , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Sangeet Khemlani,et al.  Disjunctive illusory inferences and how to eliminate them , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[14]  S. Palmer,et al.  Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. , 1982 .

[15]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[16]  Selen Türkay,et al.  Learning by teaching with virtual peers and the effects of technological design choices on learning , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Kathrin Figl Comprehension of Procedural Visual Business Process Models , 2017, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[18]  Daniel M. Johnson,et al.  Improved Memory Elicitation in Virtual Reality: New Experimental Results and Insights , 2017, INTERACT.

[19]  Boris N. Konrad,et al.  Mnemonic Training Reshapes Brain Networks to Support Superior Memory , 2017, Neuron.

[20]  Markos Mentzelopoulos,et al.  Learning Languages and Complex Subjects with Memory Palaces , 2017, iLRN.

[21]  Vesna Babi-Hodovi,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF QUALITY PRACTICES ON BH COMPANIES' BUSINESS PERFORMANCE , 2012 .

[22]  J. Förster,et al.  GLOMOsys: A Systems Account of Global Versus Local Processing , 2010 .

[23]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. , 1975 .

[24]  Catherine Plaisant,et al.  Spatial Mnemonics using Virtual Reality , 2018, ICCAE.

[25]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Performance on a virtual reality spatial memory navigation task in depressed patients. , 2007, The American journal of psychiatry.

[26]  Mark W. Bell Toward a Definition of “Virtual Worlds” , 1970 .

[27]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  Augmented reality applications in manufacturing: a survey , 2008 .

[28]  Hajo A. Reijers,et al.  Selecting a process variant modeling approach: guidelines and application , 2017, Software & Systems Modeling.

[29]  David G. Pfeiffer,et al.  Imaginary Versus Virtual Loci: Evaluating the Memorization Accuracy in a Virtual Memory Palace , 2018, HICSS.

[30]  William E Hockley,et al.  The effects of context in item-based directed forgetting: Evidence for “one-shot” context storage , 2017, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Onur Demirörs,et al.  Factors influencing the understandability of process models: A systematic literature review , 2018, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[32]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Detection and prediction of errors in EPCs of the SAP reference model , 2008, Data Knowl. Eng..

[33]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Quality indicators for business process models from a gateway complexity perspective , 2012, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[34]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[35]  Sonja Kabicher,et al.  Augmenting and Assisting Model Elicitation Tasks with 3D Virtual World Context Metadata , 2014, OTM Conferences.

[36]  Daniel Amyot,et al.  Analysing the Cognitive Effectiveness of the BPMN 2.0 Visual Notation , 2010, SLE.

[37]  A. Baddeley,et al.  When does context influence recognition memory , 1980 .

[38]  Michael Leyer,et al.  Achieving sustainable behavioral changes of daily work practices: The effect of role plays on learning process-oriented behavior , 2018, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[39]  Arunachalam Narayanan,et al.  Decision Making and Cognition in Multi‐Echelon Supply Chains: An Experimental Study , 2015 .

[40]  Susanne Robra-Bissantz,et al.  A Design Science Approach to High Immersive Mnemonic E-learning , 2016, MCIS.

[41]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Workflow Patterns , 2004, Distributed and Parallel Databases.

[42]  Ralf Laue,et al.  Influence factors for local comprehensibility of process models , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[43]  Daniel M. Johnson,et al.  Augmenting process elicitation with visual priming: An empirical exploration of user behaviour and modelling outcomes , 2016, Inf. Syst..

[44]  Xia Zheng,et al.  The use of virtual reality for episodic memory assessment: effects of active navigation. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[45]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Business Process Modeling: Current Issues and Future Challenges , 2009, CAiSE.

[46]  Jan Mendling,et al.  On Measuring the Understandability of Process Models , 2009, Business Process Management Workshops.

[47]  Bo Huang,et al.  Study of Workshop Production System Based on Petri Nets and Flexsim , 2016 .

[48]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[49]  Peter Loos,et al.  Comparing the Control-Flow of EPC and Petri Net from the End-User Perspective , 2005, Business Process Management.