ORGANIZATIONAL SYMBOLISM AND IDEOLOGY

The purpose of this article is to discuss organizational symbolism research from a critique of ideology perspective. Various aspects of ideology as a metatheoretical concept are discussed. Criteria governing when it might be appropriate to conduct a critical analysis of ideological elements in research texts are also suggested. These include restricted social autonomy of researchers, socio-political relevance and ideological usefulness of research products, social fashionability of research areas, pseudo-objective style, absence of indicated self-reflection and lack of manifested awareness of the social context of research in research publications. The organizational symbolism research field is discussed in relation to ideology and some influential texts are interpreted in the light of ideology-critique. the criteria for a sensitive reading of research texts in terms of problematical ideological elements are applied and their relevance illustrated. the article also discusses the field of organizational symbolism in terms of Habermas' concepts of cognitive interests, emancipation and undistorted communication.

[1]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  On the Popularity of Organizational Culture , 1990 .

[2]  M. Alvesson.  The culture perspective on organizations: Instrumental values and basic features of culture , 1989 .

[3]  I. Filby.  Analysing organisational culture : a critical ethnography of public relations and personnel specialists in a state bureaucracy , 1989 .

[4]  D. C. Gash,et al.  Cultures of culture: Academics, practitioners and the pragmatics of normative control , 1988 .

[5]  H. Willmott,et al.  Organizational Culture as Management Strategy: A Critique and Illustration from the Financial Services Industry , 1987 .

[6]  Norman Jackson,et al.  Management, Myth, and Metatheory — From Scarcity to Postscarcity , 1987 .

[7]  Lynn E. Miller,et al.  The Concept of Ideology in Organizational Analysis: The Sociology of Knowledge or the Social Psychology of Beliefs? , 1987 .

[8]  J. Barney,et al.  Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? , 1986 .

[9]  Thomas C. Dandridge.  Ceremony as an Integration of Work and Play , 1986 .

[10]  Brian D. Steffy,et al.  A Critical Theory of Organization Science , 1986 .

[11]  W. Nord,et al.  Practical and Emancipatory Interests in Organizational Symbolism: A Review and Evaluation , 1985 .

[12]  Michael Rosen.  Breakfast at Spiro's: Dramaturgy and Dominance , 1985 .

[13]  Richard T. Pascale,et al.  The Paradox of “Corporate Culture”: Reconciling Ourselves to Socialization , 1985 .

[14]  David R. Brodwin,et al.  Strategic implementation: Five approaches to an elusive phenomenon , 1984 .

[15]  W. Graham Astley,et al.  SUBJECTIVITY, SOPHISTRY AND SYMBOLISM IN MANAGEMENT SCIENCE , 1984 .

[16]  J. Hartley.  Ideology and Organizational Behavior , 1983 .

[17]  L. Smircich.  Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[18]  William H. Starbuck,et al.  CONGEALING OIL: INVENTING IDEOLOGIES TO JUSTIFY ACTING IDEOLOGIES OUT , 1982 .

[19]  Alan D. Meyer,et al.  How Ideologies Supplant Formal Structures And Shape Responses To Environments , 1982 .

[20]  I. Mitroff,et al.  Organizational Symbolism: A Topic To Expand Organizational Analysis , 1980 .

[21]  A. Pettigrew.  On Studying Organizational Cultures , 1979 .

[22]  Thomas J. Peters.  Symbols, patterns, and settings: An optimistic case for getting things done , 1978 .

[23]  Sherry B. Ortner.  On Key Symbols1 , 1973 .

[24]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  On systematically distorted communication , 1970 .