Protocols for Bridging the Peptide to Nonpeptide Gap in Topological Similarity Searches

Similarity searches based on chemical descriptors have proven extremely useful in aiding large-scale drug screening. Typically an investigator starts with a "probe", a drug-like molecule with an interesting biological activity, and searches a database to find similar compounds. In some projects, however, the only known actives are peptides, and the investigator needs to identify drug-like actives. 3D similarity methods are able to help in this endeavor but suffer from the necessity of having to specify the active conformation of the probe, something that is not always possible at the beginning of a project. Also, 3D methods are slow and are complicated by the need to generate low-energy conformations. In contrast, topological methods are relatively rapid and do not depend on conformation. However, unmodified topological similarity methods, given a peptide probe, will preferentially select other peptides from a database. In this paper we show some simple protocols that, if used with a standard topological similarity search method, are sufficient to select nonpeptide actives given a peptide probe. We demonstrate these protocols by using 10 peptide-like probes to select appropriate nonpeptide actives from the MDDR database.

[1]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  The Centroid Approximation for Mixtures: Calculating Similarity and Deriving Structure-Activity Relationships , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[2]  Bruce L. Bush,et al.  PATTY: A programmable atom type and language for automatic classification of atoms in molecular databases , 1993, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[3]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  PATTY: A Programmable Atom Typer and Language for Automatic Classification of Atoms in Molecular Databases. , 1994 .

[4]  David R. Lowis Molecular Hologram QSAR , 1999 .

[5]  M Félétou,et al.  Design and synthesis of new linear and cyclic bradykinin antagonists. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[6]  P. Willett,et al.  Effectiveness of retrieval in similarity searches of chemical databases: a review of performance measures. , 2000, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[7]  Ajay N. Jain Morphological similarity: A 3D molecular similarity method correlated with protein-ligand recognition , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[8]  R. Sheridan,et al.  SQ: a program for rapidly producing pharmacophorically relevent molecular superpositions. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[9]  R G Smith,et al.  Rapid identification of subtype-selective agonists of the somatostatin receptor through combinatorial chemistry. , 1998, Science.

[10]  J. Mason,et al.  New 4-point pharmacophore method for molecular similarity and diversity applications: overview of the method and applications, including a novel approach to the design of combinatorial libraries containing privileged substructures. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[11]  R D Hull,et al.  Chemical similarity searches using latent semantic structural indexing (LaSSI) and comparison to TOPOSIM. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[12]  G R Marshall,et al.  Conformationally readdressed CCK‐B/δ‐opioid pepitide ligands , 1995, Biopolymers.

[13]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  Chemical Similarity Using Physiochemical Property Descriptors , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[14]  John M. Barnard,et al.  Chemical Similarity Searching , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[15]  E G McMahon,et al.  Conformational restriction of angiotensin II: cyclic analogues having high potency. , 1990, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[16]  Malcolm J. McGregor,et al.  Clustering of Large Databases of Compounds: Using the MDL "Keys" as Structural Descriptors , 1997, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[17]  Ramaswamy Nilakantan,et al.  Topological torsion: a new molecular descriptor for SAR applications. Comparison with other descriptors , 1987, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[18]  R. Venkataraghavan,et al.  Atom pairs as molecular features in structure-activity studies: definition and applications , 1985, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..