Dual materiality and knowing in petroleum production

This paper explores the relationship between materiality and knowing through the notion of dual materiality. Dual materiality highlights how digital technology becomes important, as its materiality plays an integral part in creating, not simply representing, the materiality of the physical world. We elaborate upon this insight through a theory on sociomaterial knowing grounded in ethnographic fieldwork within a petroleum company. The main theoretical proposition of this theory is that knowing arises from the emerging patterns of interaction between material phenomena, the material arrangements for knowing about these phenomena, and knowledge practices. We elaborate upon this through three predominant modes of knowing in petroleum production: instrumentation, interpretation, and learning. This paper contributes to the broader discourse on sociomateriality by refining ideas of materiality through the notion of dual materiality. We conclude by encouraging further exploration of different materialities in contemporary work and organizing.

[1]  Karen Barad.  Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning , 2007 .

[2]  Enid Mumford,et al.  The story of socio‐technical design: reflections on its successes, failures and potential , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[3]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[4]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[5]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Material knowing: the scaffolding of human knowledgeability , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  A. Mol.  The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2003 .

[7]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  D. Ihde.  Expanding Hermeneutics: Visualism in Science , 1998 .

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[10]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[11]  Vidar Hepsø,et al.  The Social Construction and Visualisation of a Norwegian Offshore Installation , 1997, ECSCW.

[12]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[13]  B. Latour.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 1999 .

[14]  Andrew Brown,et al.  A materialist development of some recent contributions to the labour theory of value , 2007 .

[15]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[16]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[17]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[18]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  The word and the world: a critique of representationalism in management research , 1998 .

[19]  Alexander Styhre,et al.  Organizing technologies of vision: Making the invisible visible in media-laden observations , 2010, Inf. Organ..

[20]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Mis Research: Reference disciplines and a Cumulative Tradition , 1980, ICIS.

[21]  W. Orlikowski.  The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research , 2010 .

[22]  K. Baker,et al.  Toward Information Infrastructure Studies: Ways of Knowing in a Networked Environment , 2009 .

[23]  G. Walsham.  Knowledge Management:: The Benefits and Limitations of Computer Systems , 2001 .

[24]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution , 1997 .

[25]  Robin Williams,et al.  Who Decides the Shape of Product Markets? The Knowledge Institutions Who Name and Categorize New Technologies , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[26]  B. Latour.  We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[27]  Vidar Hepsø.  Common Information Spaces in Knowledge-Intensive Work: Representation and Negotiation of Meaning in Computer-Supported Collaboration Rooms , 2009 .

[28]  David M. Fetterman,et al.  Ethnography: Step-by-Step , 1989 .

[29]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Organizing Moves in Software Support Hot Lines , 1992 .

[30]  A. Mol.  Ontological Politics. A Word and Some Questions , 1999 .

[31]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[32]  Knut H. Rolland,et al.  Ecologies of e-Infrastructures , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[33]  L. Suchman.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd edition). , 2007 .

[34]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: Practice in research: phenomenon, perspective and philosophy , 2010 .

[35]  Rick Iedema,et al.  On the Multi-modality, Materially and Contingency of Organization Discourse , 2007 .

[36]  W. Orlikowski.  Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[37]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[38]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text]. , 2006, Nurse researcher.

[39]  Donald Favareau,et al.  Form, Substance and Difference , 2009 .

[40]  Arild Waaler,et al.  Digital Platform for the Next Generation IO: A Prerequisite for the High North , 2010 .

[41]  M. Alavi,et al.  KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS : CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS AND AN AGENDA FOR RESEARCH , 2007 .

[42]  Petter Grytten Almklov.  Standardized Data and Singular Situations , 2008 .

[43]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[44]  Petter Grytten Almklov,et al.  Between and beyond data: How analogue field experience informs the interpretation of remote data sources in petroleum reservoir geology , 2011 .

[45]  R. Emerson,et al.  Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes , 1995 .

[46]  Ulrike Schultze,et al.  A Confessional Account of an Ethnography About Knowledge Work , 2000, MIS Q..

[47]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[48]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Reliability, Mindfulness, and Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[49]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Data matters in IS theory building , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[50]  John Law,et al.  Shaping technology building society: studies in socio-technical change , 1993 .

[51]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Nothing At The Center?: Academic Legitimacy in the Information Systems Field , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..