The Role of Enterprise Risk Management and Organizational Strategic Flexibility in Easing New Regulatory Compliance

The impact of new regulatory requirements for internal control reporting on an organizations' ability to maintain strategic flexibility has been debated extensively. This paper uses a systems perspective to examine the relationship between an organizations' pre-regulatory effectiveness of enterprise risk management (ERM) processes and their reactiveness to new regulatory mandates. This focus on ERM processes first examines the influence of ERM on the ex ante development of organization structures (i.e. information technology systems compatibility and organizational strategic flexibility). These structures are then examined for their influence on the use of appropriate actions (i.e. control environment and comprehensive compliance processes) to mitigate the difficulty of compliance. Data were collected on these main constructs and related influential constructs from chief audit executives representing a broad range of North American organizations. We specifically focus on Section 404 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (hereafter, SOX 404). Structural modeling was used to test the relationships simultaneously and to understand the predictive behavior of the various attributes. First, the results reveal a strong positive relationship between the effectiveness of ERM and strategic flexibility which is partially mediated by IT compatibility-the ability to capture and share data across an enterprise. Second, the results show a strong positive relationship between strategic flexibility and use of effective implementation processes for new compliance requirements over internal control reporting, but the relationship is fully mediated by the strength of an organization's control environment. Third, our structural model allows us to identify both direct effects of ERM effectiveness on the strength of the control environment and the indirect effects of ERM effectiveness on control environment via the interrelationships with IT compatibility and strategic flexibility. Measurement of these indirect effects captures a more complete view as to the influence of ERM effectiveness on the strength of the control environment; the combined direct and indirect effects increase by 16% the variance in strength of control environment explained by ERM. In brief, our research finds that organizations with effective ERM processes and flexible organizational structures already in place incurred little difficulty in implementing SOX 404 mandates, while organizations that lacked effective ERM processes prior to SOX 404 compliance had weaker implementation processes and had a more difficult experience in complying with the mandates. These findings provide key insights into the importance of ERM for creating an organizational form that can effectively deal with regulatory compliance issues in volatile environments.

[1]  Lili-Anne Kihn,et al.  Information system integration, enabling control and performance , 2009 .

[2]  E. Banks The Future of Risk Management , 2009 .

[3]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  Advancing formative measurement models , 2008 .

[4]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[5]  Robert H. Chenhall,et al.  The role of management control systems in planned organizational change: An analysis of two organizations , 2007 .

[6]  Frank G. H. Hartmann,et al.  Management accounting systems, top management team heterogeneity and strategic change , 2007 .

[7]  Vicky Arnold,et al.  The Unintended Consequences of Sarbanes-Oxley on Technology Innovation and Supply Chain Integration , 2007 .

[8]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[9]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[10]  Frank G. H. Hartmann,et al.  How Top Management Teams Use Management Accounting Systems to Implement Strategy , 2006 .

[11]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Formative versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration , 2006 .

[12]  Mark L. DeFond,et al.  Audit Research after Sarbanes‐Oxley , 2005 .

[13]  D. R. Hermanson,et al.  Enterprise risk management: An empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation , 2005 .

[14]  Mustafa C. Ungan Management support for the adoption of manufacturing best practices: key factors , 2005 .

[15]  Ramaraj Palanisamy,et al.  Strategic information systems planning model for building flexibility and success , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[16]  R. Romano,et al.  The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance , 2004 .

[17]  Thomas Ahrens,et al.  Accounting for Flexibility and Efficiency: A Field Study of Management Control Systems in a Restaurant Chain , 2004 .

[18]  A. R. Cannon,et al.  Competitive strategy and plant-level flexibility , 2004 .

[19]  Angelo Ditillo,et al.  Dealing with uncertainty in knowledge-intensive firms: the role of management control systems as knowledge integration mechanisms , 2004 .

[20]  Robert Levine,et al.  Risk Management Systems: Understanding the Need , 2004, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[21]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[22]  R. Chenhall Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future , 2003 .

[23]  Ryan B. Lee,et al.  The Effect of Corporate Governance on the Use of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence from Canada , 2003 .

[24]  R. Hoyt,et al.  The Determinants of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence from the Appointment of Chief Risk Officers , 2003 .

[25]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[26]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  Building Organizational Capabilities for Managing Economic Crisis: The Role of Market Orientation and Strategic Flexibility , 2001 .

[27]  M. Oliverio Internal control—integrated framework: who is responsible? , 2001 .

[28]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  Measuring the Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: Exploratory Analysis of a Construct , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Tony Davila,et al.  An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems' design in new product development , 2000 .

[30]  M. Abernethy,et al.  The consequences of customization on management accounting system design , 2000 .

[31]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies , 1999, MIS Q..

[32]  Margaret A. Abernethy,et al.  The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: an exploratory study , 1999 .

[33]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[34]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[35]  Kim Langfield-Smith,et al.  Management control systems and strategy: A critical review☆ , 1997 .

[36]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Towards The Flexible Form: How To Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments , 1996 .

[37]  Varun Grover,et al.  Special Section: Toward a Theory of Business Process Change Management , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Anne M. Lillis,et al.  The impact of manufacturing flexibility on management control system design , 1995 .

[39]  R. Sanchez Strategic flexibility in product competition , 1995 .

[40]  Terry L. Amburgey,et al.  Strategic momentum: The effects of repetitive, positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity , 1992 .

[41]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Resetting the Clock: The Dynamics of Organizational Change and Failure. , 1990 .

[42]  Robert A. Simons The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: New perspectives☆ , 1990 .

[43]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .