Complexity vs. stability in small-world networks

According to the May–Wigner stability theorem, increasing the complexity of a network inevitably leads to its destabilization, such that a small perturbation will be able to disrupt the entire system. One of the principal arguments against this observation is that it is valid only for random networks, and therefore does not apply to real-world networks, which presumably are structured. Here, we examine how the introduction of small-world topological structure into networks affects their stability. Our results indicate that, in structured networks, the parameter values at which the stability–instability transition occurs with increasing complexity is identical to that predicted by the May–Wigner criteria. However, the nature of the transition, as measured by the finite-size scaling exponent, appears to change as the network topology transforms from regular to random, with the small-world regime as the cross-over region. This behavior is related to the localization of the largest eigenvalues along the real axis in the eigenvalue plain with increasing regularity in the network.

[1]  Sitabhra Sinha,et al.  Examining the effects of species richness on community stability: an assembly model approach , 2002 .

[2]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  J. Tainter The Collapse of Complex Societies , 1988 .

[4]  R. Monasson Diffusion, localization and dispersion relations on “small-world” lattices , 1999 .

[5]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Spectra of "real-world" graphs: beyond the semicircle law. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  J. E. Cohen,et al.  Global stability, local stability and permanence in model food webs. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  B. Huberman,et al.  The stability of ecosystems , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[8]  MARK R. GARDNER,et al.  Connectance of Large Dynamic (Cybernetic) Systems: Critical Values for Stability , 1970, Nature.

[9]  J. Tainter,et al.  The Collapse of Complex Societies , 1988 .

[10]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[11]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Robust patterns in food web structure. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[12]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  Stability of a neural network model with small-world connections. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  J. Montoya,et al.  Small world patterns in food webs. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  K. McCann The diversity–stability debate , 2000, Nature.

[16]  R. McMurtrie,et al.  Determinants of stability of large randomly connected systems. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  Sommers,et al.  Spectrum of large random asymmetric matrices. , 1988, Physical review letters.