Clustering fMRI data with a robust unsupervised learning algorithm for neuroscience data mining

BACKGROUND Clustering approaches used in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) research use brain activity to divide the brain into various parcels with some degree of homogeneous characteristics, but choosing the appropriate clustering algorithms remains a problem. NEW METHOD A novel application of the robust unsupervised learning approach is proposed in the current study. Robust growing neural gas (RGNG) algorithm was fed into fMRI data and compared with growing neural gas (GNG) algorithm, which has not been used for this purpose or any other medical application. Learning algorithms proposed in the current study are fed with real and free auditory fMRI datasets. RESULTS The fMRI result obtained by running RGNG was within the expected outcome and is similar to those found with the hypothesis method in detecting active areas within the expected auditory cortices. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S) The fMRI application of the presented RGNG approach is clearly superior to other approaches in terms of its insensitivity to different initializations and the presence of outliers, as well as its ability to determine the actual number of clusters successfully, as indicated by its performance measured by minimum description length (MDL) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. CONCLUSIONS The RGNG can detect the active zones in the brain, analyze brain function, and determine the optimal number of underlying clusters in fMRI datasets. This algorithm can define the positions of the center of an output cluster corresponding to the minimal MDL value.

[1]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Plurality and Resemblance in fMRI Data Analysis , 1999, NeuroImage.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A multivariate analysis of PET activation studies , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  CHAPTER 2 – Statistical parametric mapping , 2007 .

[4]  Hussain A. Jaber,et al.  Performance evaluation of prototype‐based clustering algorithms combined MDL index , 2017, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ..

[5]  J. Rissanen A UNIVERSAL PRIOR FOR INTEGERS AND ESTIMATION BY MINIMUM DESCRIPTION LENGTH , 1983 .

[6]  Ali Taalimi,et al.  Extracting activated regions of fMRI data using unsupervised learning , 2009, 2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[7]  John C. Gore,et al.  ROC Analysis of Statistical Methods Used in Functional MRI: Individual Subjects , 1999, NeuroImage.

[8]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  A quantitative comparison of functional MRI cluster analysis , 2004, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[9]  Baxter P. Rogers,et al.  Analyzing fMRI data with graph-based visualizations of self-organizing maps , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[10]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: A tutorial overview , 2009, NeuroImage.

[11]  Anke Meyer-Bäse,et al.  Model-free functional MRI analysis based on unsupervised clustering , 2004 .

[12]  Hans Knutsson,et al.  Exploratory fMRI Analysis by Autocorrelation Maximization , 2002, NeuroImage.

[13]  Hichem Frigui,et al.  A Robust Competitive Clustering Algorithm With Applications in Computer Vision , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  Jerzy Korczak,et al.  Visual Exploration of Functional MRI Data , 2012 .

[15]  M. McKeown Detection of Consistently Task-Related Activations in fMRI Data with Hybrid Independent Component Analysis , 2000, NeuroImage.

[16]  J. Minckler,et al.  A note on the gross configurations of the human auditory cortex , 1976, Brain and Language.

[17]  Nicolas Lachiche,et al.  Neuronal Clustering of Brain fMRI Images , 2005, PReMI.

[18]  M. Lindquist The Statistical Analysis of fMRI Data. , 2008, 0906.3662.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Detecting subject-specific activations using fuzzy clustering , 2007, NeuroImage.

[20]  V D Calhoun,et al.  Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task‐related waveforms , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[21]  Hadeel K. Aljobouri,et al.  From Biomedical Signal Processing Techniques to fMRI Parcellation , 2015 .

[22]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  On Clustering fMRI Time Series , 1999, NeuroImage.

[23]  Xu Sun,et al.  Fast Implementation of DeLong’s Algorithm for Comparing the Areas Under Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[24]  C. Windischberger,et al.  Quantification in functional magnetic resonance imaging: fuzzy clustering vs. correlation analysis. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[25]  S Makeig,et al.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[26]  Lin Chen,et al.  An integrated neighborhood correlation and hierarchical clustering approach of functional MRI , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Connectivity: The Principal-Component Analysis of Large (PET) Data Sets , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[28]  E. Oja,et al.  Independent Component Analysis , 2013 .

[29]  P. N. Suganthan,et al.  Robust growing neural gas algorithm with application in cluster analysis , 2004, Neural Networks.

[30]  Qin Yang,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Data Using Improved Self-Organizing Mapping and Spatio-Temporal Metric Hierarchical Clustering , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  fMRI of the auditory system: understanding the neural basis of auditory gestalt. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.