Quantitative Evaluation of Perspective and Stereoscopic Displays in Three-Axis Manual Tracking Tasks

Optimal presentation of three-dimensional information on a two-dimensional display screen requires careful design of the projection to the display surface. Monoscopic perspective projection alone is usually not sufficient to represent three-dimensional spatial information. It can, however, be improved by the adjustment of perspective parameters and by geometric visual enhancements such as reference lines and a background grid. Stereoscopic display is another method of providing three-dimensional information to the human operator. Two experiments are performed with three-axis manual tracking tasks. The first experiment investigates the effects of perspective parameters on tracking performance. The second experiment investigates the effects of visual enhancements for both monoscopic and stereoscopic displays. Results indicate that, though stereoscopic displays do generally permit superior tracking performance, monoscopic displays can allow equivalent performance when they are defined with optimal perspective parameters and provided with adequate visual enhancements.

[1]  Ross L. Pepper,et al.  Stereo TV Improves Operator Performance Under Degraded Visibility Conditions , 1981 .

[2]  Kokichi Tanaka,et al.  A Binocular Stereoscopic Display System for Echocardiography , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Michael A. McAnulty,et al.  Low-Level Graphics Cues For Solicit Image Interpretation , 1984, Other Conferences.

[4]  A. S. Gilinsky,et al.  The effect of attitude upon the perception of size. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[5]  A. S. Gilinsky Perceived size and distance in visual space. , 1951, Psychological review.

[6]  A. K. Bejczy,et al.  Event-driven displays for manipulator control , 1978 .

[7]  A K Bejczy,et al.  Sensors, Controls, and Man-Machine Interface for Advanced Teleoperation , 1980, Science.

[8]  Everett Palmer,et al.  A Measure of Psychological Realism on a Visual Simulator , 1977 .

[9]  F. J. Drinkwater,et al.  A flight study of manual blind landing performance using closed circuit television displays , 1964 .

[10]  I. Carlbom,et al.  Planar Geometric Projections and Viewing Transformations , 1978, CSUR.

[11]  Hideyuki Tamura,et al.  3-D View Of Serial Section Images By Binocular Stereo , 1984, Other Conferences.

[12]  S R Ellis,et al.  Statistical Dependency in Visual Scanning , 1986, Human factors.

[13]  Lewis J. Pinson,et al.  A Real-Time Stereoscopic Small-Computer Graphics Display System , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[14]  J.K. Udupa,et al.  Display of 3D information in discrete 3D scenes produced by computerized tomography , 1983, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[15]  Rainer K. Bernotat,et al.  Rotation of Visual Reference Systems and Its Influence on Control Quality , 1970 .

[16]  Stanley N. Roscoe,et al.  Effects of Magnification and Visual Accommodation on Aimpoint Estimation in Simulated Landings With Real and Virtual Image Displays. , 1980 .

[17]  A. K. Bejczy,et al.  Evaluation of SMART sensor displays for multidimensional precision control of Space Shuttle remote manipulator , 1982 .

[18]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  Visual enhancements in pick-and-place tasks: Human operators controlling a simulated cylindrical manipulator , 1987, IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation.

[19]  Stephen R. Ellis,et al.  Influence of a Perspective Cockpit Traffic Display Format on Pilot Avoidance Maneuvers , 1983 .