Sourcing of Steam and Electricity for Carbon Capture Retrofits.

This paper compares different steam and electricity sources for carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) retrofits of pulverized coal (PC) and natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plants. Analytical expressions for the thermal efficiency of these power plants are derived under 16 different CCS retrofit scenarios for the purpose of illustrating their environmental and economic characteristics. The scenarios emerge from combinations of steam and electricity sources, fuel used in each source, steam generation equipment and process details, and the extent of CO2 capture. Comparing these scenarios reveals distinct trade-offs between thermal efficiency, net power output, levelized cost, profit, and net CO2 reduction. Despite causing the highest loss in useful power output, bleeding steam and extracting electric power from the main power plant to meet the CCS plant's electricity and steam demand maximizes plant efficiency and profit while minimizing emissions and levelized cost when wholesale electricity prices are below 4.5 and 5.2 US¢/kWh for PC-CCS and NGCC-CCS plants, respectively. At prices higher than these higher profits for operating CCS retrofits can be obtained by meeting 100% of the CCS plant's electric power demand using an auxiliary natural gas turbine-based combined heat and power plant.

[1]  Sarang D Supekar,et al.  Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Nilay Shah,et al.  Identification of the cost-optimal degree of CO2 capture: An optimisation study using dynamic process models , 2013 .

[3]  Chechet Biliyok,et al.  Heat integration and exergy analysis for a supercritical high-ash coal-fired power plant integrated with a post-combustion carbon capture process , 2014 .

[4]  Paulina Jaramillo,et al.  The Economic Merits of Flexible Carbon Capture and Sequestration as a Compliance Strategy with the Clean Power Plan. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  G. Peters,et al.  The trouble with negative emissions , 2016, Science.

[6]  Haibo Zhai,et al.  Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  R. Pindyck Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us? , 2013 .

[8]  Mathieu Lucquiaud,et al.  On the retrofitting and repowering of coal power plants with post-combustion carbon capture: An advanced integration option with a gas turbine windbox , 2017 .

[9]  Ming Zhao,et al.  A review of techno-economic models for the retrofitting of conventional pulverised-coal power plants for post-combustion capture (PCC) of CO2 , 2013 .

[10]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  A proposed methodology for CO2 capture and storage cost estimates , 2013 .

[11]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Initial evaluation of the impact of post-combustion capture of carbon dioxide on supercritical pulverised coal power plant part load performance , 2007 .

[12]  M. Mercedes Maroto-Valer,et al.  An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies , 2014 .

[13]  Y. Hwang,et al.  Multi-functional heat pumps integration in power plants for CO2 capture and sequestration , 2015 .

[14]  S Pacala,et al.  Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies , 2004, Science.

[15]  Hana Gerbelová,et al.  The effect of retrofitting Portuguese fossil fuel power plants with CCS , 2013 .

[16]  Ali Abbas,et al.  HEN optimization for efficient retrofitting of coal-fired power plants with post-combustion carbon capture , 2011 .

[17]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization , 2007 .

[18]  Louis J. Durlofsky,et al.  Optimizing heat integration in a flexible coal–natural gas power station with CO2 capture , 2014 .

[19]  Devin Shaw,et al.  Cansolv CO2 capture: The value of integration , 2009 .

[20]  Matthias Finkenrath,et al.  CCS Retrofit: Analysis of the Globally Installed Coal-Fired Power Plant Fleet , 2012 .

[21]  Kazuya Goto,et al.  A review of efficiency penalty in a coal-fired power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture , 2013 .

[22]  W. R. Morrow,et al.  The Technology Path to Deep Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cuts by 2050: The Pivotal Role of Electricity , 2012, Science.

[23]  Andrew Forbes Alexander Hoadley,et al.  Using multi-objective optimisation in the design of CO2 capture systems for retrofit to coal power stations , 2012 .

[24]  Howard J. Herzog,et al.  Using auxiliary gas power for CCS energy needs in retrofitted coal power plants , 2011 .

[25]  Klaus Görner,et al.  Analysis of retrofitting coal-fired power plants with carbon dioxide capture , 2009 .

[26]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Public perception of carbon capture and storage (CCS): A review , 2014 .

[27]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Maintaining the power output of an existing coal plant with the addition of CO2 capture: Retrofits options with gas turbine combined cycle plants , 2014 .

[28]  S. C. Smelser,et al.  An engineering and economic evaluation of CO2 removal from fossil-fuel-fired power plants , 1991 .

[29]  D. Foley,et al.  The social cost of carbon emissions: Seven propositions ✩ , 2013 .

[30]  S. Stoft Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity , 2002 .

[31]  Cristian Carraretto,et al.  Optimum production plans for thermal power plants in the deregulated electricity market , 2006 .

[32]  Mohamed A. Habib Thermodynamic analysis of the performance of cogeneration plants , 1992 .

[33]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Retrofitting CO2 capture ready fossil plants with post-combustion capture. Part 1: Requirements for supercritical pulverized coal plants using solvent-based flue gas scrubbing , 2009 .

[34]  Yongping Yang,et al.  Integration and optimization study on the coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture using MEA , 2012 .

[35]  Sarang D Supekar,et al.  Market-driven emissions from recovery of carbon dioxide gas. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Nils Markusson,et al.  Last chance for carbon capture and storage , 2013 .

[37]  Andrew Forbes Alexander Hoadley,et al.  Optimisation of power stations with carbon capture plants – the trade-off between costs and net power , 2012 .

[38]  I. Sreedhar,et al.  A journey into the process and engineering aspects of carbon capture technologies , 2015 .

[39]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF COGENERATION PLANTS , 2009 .

[40]  Maura Vaccarelli,et al.  Studying heat integration options for steam-gas power plants retrofitted with CO2 post-combustion capture , 2015 .

[41]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Life cycle water use of coal- and natural-gas-fired power plants with and without carbon capture and storage , 2016 .

[42]  Eric Croiset,et al.  Simulation of CO2 capture using MEA scrubbing: a flowsheet decomposition method , 2005 .

[43]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Retrofitting CO2 capture ready fossil plants with post-combustion capture. Part 2: Requirements for natural gas combined cycle plants using solvent-based flue gas scrubbing , 2009 .

[44]  Veronique Van Speybroeck,et al.  Carbon capture turned upside down: high-temperature adsorption & low-temperature desorption (HALD) , 2015 .

[45]  Cristian Carraretto,et al.  Power plant operation and management in a deregulated market , 2006 .

[46]  Charles F. Harvey,et al.  The energy penalty of post-combustion CO2 capture & storage and its implications for retrofitting the U.S. installed base , 2009 .

[47]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Key indicators to track current progress and future ambition of the Paris Agreement , 2017 .

[48]  E. J. Anthony,et al.  Carbon capture and storage update , 2014 .