Responses to Static Visual Images in Macaque Lateral Geniculate Nucleus: Implications for Adaptation, Negative Afterimages, and Visual Fading

Adaptation to static scenes is a familiar and fundamental aspect of visual perception that causes negative afterimages, fading, and many other visual illusions. To establish a foundation for understanding the neuronal bases of such phenomena and to constrain the contributions of retinal versus cortical processing, we studied the responses of neurons in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus during and after the presentation of prolonged static visual stimuli. We found that parvocellular (P) cells (the more numerous and color-sensitive pathway) showed response adaptation with a time constant on the order of tens of seconds and that their response after the removal of a visual stimulus lasting 1 min was similar in amplitude and time course to the response evoked by the photographic negative stimulus. Magnocellular (M) cells (the faster-conducting and achromatic pathway) had after responses that were substantially weaker than responses evoked by patterned visual stimuli. This difference points to the existence of an adaptive mechanism in the P-pathway that is absent or impaired in the M-pathway and is inconsistent with full adaptation of photoreceptors, which feed both pathways. Cells in both pathways often maintained a substantial tonic response throughout 1 min stimuli, suggesting that these major feedforward inputs to cortex adapt too slowly to account for visual fading. Our findings suggest that faster-adapting mechanisms in cortex are likely to be required to account for the dynamics of perception during and after the viewing of prolonged static images.

[1]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Visual response latencies of magnocellular and parvocellular LGN neurons in macaque monkeys , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[2]  R. S. Creed,et al.  Latency of after‐images and interaction between the two retino‐cerebral apparatuses in man , 1930, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Y Kamitani,et al.  Afterimage of Perceptually Filled-in Surface , 2001, Science.

[4]  H D BAKER The course of foveal light adaptation measured by the threshold intensity increment. , 1949, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[5]  C. Koch,et al.  Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  V. Virsu,et al.  Long-lasting afterimages caused by neural adaptation , 1977, Vision Research.

[7]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Saturation and adaptation in the rod system , 1982, Vision Research.

[8]  S. W. Kuffler Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. , 1953, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The dynamics of primate M retinal ganglion cells , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[10]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Chapter 9 Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls , 1984 .

[11]  Robert K. Moore,et al.  Temporal properties of the human visual nervous system , 1977, Vision Research.

[12]  Latency and duration of monocular and binocular after-images. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  J M Loomis,et al.  The photopigment bleaching hypothesis of complementary after-images: a psychophysical test. , 1972, Vision research.

[14]  William R. Softky,et al.  Comparison of discharge variability in vitro and in vivo in cat visual cortex neurons. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Barry B. Lee,et al.  Suppressive Surrounds and Contrast Gain in Magnocellular-Pathway Retinal Ganglion Cells of Macaque , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Movshon,et al.  The Timing of Response Onset and Offset in Macaque Visual Neurons , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  D H Kelly,et al.  Measurements of chromatic and achromatic afterimages. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  H. Barlow,et al.  Single Units and Sensation: A Neuron Doctrine for Perceptual Psychology? , 1972, Perception.

[19]  D. Hood,et al.  Lower-level visual processing and models of light adaptation. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  Scott S. Grigsby,et al.  Perceptual correlates of magnocellular and parvocellular channels: Seeing form and depth in afterimages , 1990, Vision Research.

[21]  H R Wilson,et al.  A neural model of foveal light adaptation and afterimage formation , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[22]  P. Schiller,et al.  Functional specificity of lateral geniculate nucleus laminae of the rhesus monkey. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  H. Barlow,et al.  Three factors limiting the reliable detection of light by retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  Barry B. Lee,et al.  The time course of adaptation in macaque retinal ganglion cells , 1996, Vision Research.

[25]  R. J. Koshel,et al.  Subtractive processes in light adaptation , 1992, Vision Research.

[26]  E. B. Delabarre On the Seat of Optical After-Images , 1889 .

[27]  U. Tulunay-Keesey,et al.  Fading of stabilized retinal images. , 1982, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[28]  R. Shapley,et al.  The effect of contrast on the transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  R. Blake,et al.  The Interaction between Binocular Rivalry and Negative Afterimages , 2005, Current Biology.

[30]  Stuart Anstis,et al.  Interactions between simultaneous contrast and coloured afterimages , 1978, Vision Research.

[31]  P H Schiller,et al.  Visual aftereffects and the consequences of visual system lesions on their perception in the rhesus monkey , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[32]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  D. Dacey Parallel pathways for spectral coding in primate retina. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.