The Carbon Farming Initiative: removing the obstacles to its success

In December 2011, the Australian Government introduced the Carbon Farming Initiative (CFI), a project-based, baseline-and-credit offset scheme for emissions and removals from the land use, land use change and forestry, agriculture and waste sectors. The scheme is one of the most robust of its kind, having several innovative design features developed to deal with integrity and perverse impact risks, and promote co-benefits. Despite this, there are a number of issues undermining the capacity of the CFI to realize cheap abatement opportunities and improve environmental outcomes. This paper provides an overview of the CFI and an analysis of the obstacles to its success. Suggestions for improvements are made, including substituting a flexible permanence period–permanence deduction mechanism for the existing 100-year rule and modifying the risk of reversal buffer and leakage deduction processes to improve returns to project proponents.

[1]  D. Stern,et al.  Decomposing the 2010 global carbon dioxide emissions rebound , 2012 .

[2]  M. Weitzman.  On the 'Environmental' Discount Rate , 1994 .

[3]  C. Kroeze.  N2O from animal waste. Methodology according to IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. , 1997 .

[4]  F. Jotzo.  Australia’s carbon price , 2012 .

[5]  M. Kirschbaum,et al.  Can Trees Buy Time? An Assessment of the Role of Vegetation Sinks as Part of the Global Carbon Cycle , 2003 .

[6]  Mancur Olson,et al.  Positive Time Preference , 1981, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  Andrea Hublin,et al.  NATIONAL INVENTORY REPORT 2007 , 2007 .

[8]  Kim Pingoud,et al.  The role of carbon sequestration and the tonne-year approach in fulfilling the objective of climate convention , 2002 .

[9]  R. Deal,et al.  Bundling of ecosystem services to increase forestland value and enhance sustainable forest management , 2012 .

[10]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Global warming feedbacks on terrestrial carbon uptake under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Emission Scenarios , 2001 .

[11]  Craig Hofford,et al.  Annual Reports , 1952, Pennsylvania medical journal.

[12]  A. Caparrós,et al.  Conflicts between biodiversity and carbon sequestration programs: economic and legal implications , 2003 .

[13]  Andrew J. Plantinga,et al.  Co-Benefits from Carbon Sequestration in Forests: Evaluating Reductions in Agricultural Externalities from an Afforestation Policy in Wisconsin , 2003, Land Economics.

[14]  S. B. Blackwell,et al.  MITIGATION , 2008, The Law of Damages in International Sales.

[15]  M. Kirschbaum,et al.  Temporary Carbon Sequestration Cannot Prevent Climate Change , 2006 .

[16]  R. Harper,et al.  Current status and future prospects for carbon forestry in Australia , 2012 .

[17]  David Paré,et al.  Carbon accumulation in agricultural soils after afforestation: a meta‐analysis , 2010 .

[18]  Keryn I. Paul,et al.  Predicted change in soil carbon following afforestation or reforestation, and analysis of controlling factors by linking a C accounting model (CAMFor) to models of forest growth (3PG), litter decomposition (GENDEC) and soil C turnover (RothC) , 2003 .

[19]  J. Antle,et al.  Creating Incentives for the Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices in Developing Countries: The Role of Soil Carbon Sequestration , 2003 .

[20]  F. Andersson,et al.  The Australian carbon tax: a step in the right direction but not enough , 2012 .

[21]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming , 2000 .

[22]  K. Chomitz.  Evaluating Carbon Offsets from Forestry and Energy Projects: How Do They Compare? , 1999 .

[23]  Corey J. A. Bradshaw,et al.  iREDD hedges against avoided deforestation's unholy trinity of leakage, permanence and additionality , 2012 .

[24]  P. David.  Path dependence: a foundational concept for historical social science , 2007 .

[25]  G. Luck.  The New Economy of Nature: The Quest to Make Conservation Profitable: By Gretchen C. Daily, Katherine Ellison, Island Press, Washington, DC, 2002. 260 pp.; ISBN 1559639458 , 2002 .

[26]  James E. Salzman,et al.  The Curious Case of Greening in Carbon Markets , 2011 .

[27]  Charlie Wilson,et al.  An equivalence factor between CO2 avoidedemissions and sequestration – description andapplications in forestry , 2000 .

[28]  Ian R. Fry.  Twists and Turns in the Jungle: Exploring the Evolution of Land Use, Land–Use Change and Forestry Decisions within the Kyoto Protocol , 2002 .

[29]  A. Macintosh.  Are forest management reference levels incompatible with robust climate outcomes? A case study on Australia , 2011 .

[30]  Lambert Schneider,et al.  A Clean Development Mechanism with global atmospheric benefits for a post-2012 climate regime , 2009 .

[31]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Water Quality Co-Effects of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in U.S. Agriculture , 2005 .

[32]  P. Coyne.  The great debate -- a one-day wonder? , 1976 .

[33]  R. Keenan,et al.  Australia's Carbon Pricing Mechanism , 2012 .

[34]  P. Fearnside.  SAVING TROPICAL FORESTS AS A GLOBAL WARMING COUNTERMEASURE: AN ISSUE THAT DIVIDES THE ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT , 2001 .

[35]  Annette Freibauer,et al.  The rules for land use, land use change and forestry under the Kyoto Protocol-lessons learned for the future climate negotiations , 2007 .

[36]  R. Wise,et al.  Carbon-Accounting Methods and Reforestation Incentives , 2003 .

[37]  Hiromitsu Samejima,et al.  Co-Benefits of Sustainable Forest Management in Biodiversity Conservation and Carbon Sequestration , 2009, PloS one.

[38]  M. Feldstein.  The Social Time Preference Discount Rate in Cost Benefit Analysis , 1964 .

[39]  Gregg Marland,et al.  Accounting for sequestered carbon: the question of permanence , 2001 .

[40]  M. Lawes,et al.  Comparing above-ground biomass among forest types in the Wet Tropics: Small stems and plantation types matter in carbon accounting , 2012 .

[41]  W. Montgomery,et al.  Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs" Journal of Economic Theory , 1972 .

[42]  Ian R. Fry.  More Twists, Turns and Stumbles in the Jungle: A Further Exploration of Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry Decisions within the Kyoto Protocol , 2007 .

[43]  V. Brovkin,et al.  Atmospheric lifetime of fossil-fuel carbon dioxide , 2009 .

[44]  W. Cline.  Economics of Global Warming, The , 1992 .

[45]  Gu Lb,et al.  Soil carbon stocks and land use change : a meta analysis , 2022 .

[46]  K. Chomitz,et al.  Optimal Use of Carbon Sequestration in a Global Climate Change Strategy: Is There a Wooden Bridge to a Clean Energy Future? , 2001 .

[47]  P. V. Oosterzee.  The integration of biodiversity and climate change: A contextual assessment of the carbon farming initiative , 2012 .

[48]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry , 2015 .

[49]  Yoshiki Yamagata,et al.  A synopsis of land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) under the Kyoto Protocol and Marrakech Accords , 2007 .

[50]  Henning Rentz,et al.  Joint implementation and the question of `additionality'--a proposal for a pragmatic approach to identify possible joint implementation projects , 1998 .

[51]  H. Hotelling.  The economics of exhaustible resources , 1931, Journal of Political Economy.

[52]  Gregg Marland,et al.  Carbon management and biodiversity. , 2003, Journal of Environmental Management.

[53]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  Accounting for time in Mitigating Global Warming through land-use change and forestry , 2000 .

[54]  F. Schmidt.  Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[55]  Gregg Marland,et al.  Land use & global climate change : forests, land management and the Kyoto Protocol , 2000 .

[56]  Keryn I. Paul,et al.  Change in soil carbon following afforestation , 2002 .

[57]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Effects of afforestation with Eucalyptus grandis on soil physicochemical and microbiological properties , 2010 .

[58]  Emma Paulsson,et al.  A review of the CDM literature: from fine-tuning to critical scrutiny? , 2009 .

[59]  O. Davidson,et al.  Climate change 2001 : mitigation , 2001 .

[60]  N. Stern,et al.  Why Economic Analysis Supports Strong Action on Climate Change: A Response to the Stern Review's Critics , 2008, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[61]  R. Keenan,et al.  Science and the governance of Australia's climate regime , 2012 .

[62]  J. Dales.  Pollution, property and prices;: An essay in policy-making and economics , 1970 .

[63]  Australian Capital Territory.  SENATE RURAL AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS AND TRANSPORT REFERENCES COMMITTEE , 2015 .

[64]  Martijn Gough.  Climate change , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[65]  R. Harper,et al.  The potential of greenhouse sinks to underwrite improved land management , 2007 .

[66]  Bruce A. McCarl,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential in U.S. Forestry and Agriculture , 2005 .

[67]  P. Pierson.  Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[68]  B. McCarl,et al.  Permanence discounting for land-based carbon sequestration , 2008 .