Personal Expressive Bibliography in the Public Space of Cultural Heritage Institutions

Through their composition, arrangement and description, collections of objects and information resources, including those held by libraries, archives, and museums, tell a form of story; principles of selection, organization, and description produce an interpretive frame that shapes the meaning of each collection. Within cultural heritage institutions, however, such effects may run counter to longstanding goals and values. While interoperable information management systems, for example, facilitate universal access, the goal of interoperability constrains the generation of distinctively expressive descriptive systems. User-supplied collections of citations, however, are free to exploit a wider communicative potential of collecting and describing than those from the institutional perspective, and can provide an intriguing counterpoint to it. This article examines three means by which such personal, expressive bibliographies may communicate differently from institutional collections: through eclectic goals for collecting and describing, through a unique authorial voice, and through engagement with emotional experience. Expressive bibliographies that display such characteristics exhibit the combination of control and ambiguity that Umberto Eco (2009) calls the poetry of lists.

[1]  Birger Hjørland.  The classification of psychology : A case study in the classification of a knowledge field , 1998 .

[2]  Hope A. Olson.  Mapping Beyond Dewey's Boundaries: Constructing Classification Space for Marginalized Knowledge Domains , 1998, Libr. Trends.

[3]  Hope A. Olson,et al.  Standardization, Objectivity, and User Focus: A Meta-Analysis of Subject Access Critiques , 2001 .

[4]  Robert M. Colomb,et al.  Classification in context , 2002 .

[5]  Barbara Johnstone,et al.  The Linguistic Individual: Self-Expression in Language and Linguistics , 1996 .

[6]  S. Stewart.  On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection , 1984 .

[7]  Umberto Eco,et al.  The Infinity of Lists , 2009 .

[8]  Susan M. Pearce,et al.  Interpreting Objects and Collections , 1994 .

[9]  Fiona Cameron,et al.  Complexity, Transdisciplinarity and Museum Collections Documentation , 2009 .

[10]  George Macgregor,et al.  Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool , 2006 .

[11]  Peter Elbow,et al.  Voice in Writing Again: Embracing Contraries , 2007 .

[12]  Jennifer Trant,et al.  Exploring the potential for social tagging and folksonomy in art museums: Proof of concept , 2006, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[13]  Fiona Cameron,et al.  Object-oriented democracies: conceptualising museum collections in networks , 2008 .

[14]  Alexis Wright,et al.  Politics of writing , 2002 .

[15]  Ann Cvetkovich,et al.  An Archive of Feelings: Trauma, Sexuality, and Lesbian Public Cultures , 2003 .

[16]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences , 2009 .

[17]  M. Doty.  Still Life With Oysters and Lemon , 2001 .

[18]  S. Keene.  Museums and the interpretation of visual culture , 2005 .

[19]  Michelle Light,et al.  Colophons and Annotations: New Directions for the Finding Aid , 2007 .

[20]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Creating the Next Generation of Archival Finding Aids , 2007, D Lib Mag..

[21]  Jens-Erik Mai,et al.  Classification in context: Relativity, reality, and representation , 2004 .

[22]  W. King.  Collections of Nothing , 2008 .

[23]  W. Duff,et al.  Stories and names: Archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings , 2002 .

[24]  W. Riggan,et al.  The Rhetoric of Fiction , 1984 .

[25]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Rigorous Systematic Bibliography. , 1976 .

[26]  L. Faigley.  Fragments of Rationality: Postmodernity and the Subject of Composition , 1992 .

[27]  L. Kelly,et al.  Participatory Communication with Social Media , 2008 .