Factors Associated with the Selection of Mutations Conferring Resistance to Protease Inhibitors (PIs) in PI-Experienced Patients Displaying Treatment Failure on Darunavir

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to characterize the mutations selected by darunavir (DRV) use in protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced patients and the associated factors. We analyzed treatment failure in 54 PI-experienced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients on a DRV- and ritonavir-containing regimen. Viral genotyping was carried out at the baseline, at between 1 and 3 months of treatment, and at between 3 and 6 months of treatment to search for the selection of mutations conferring resistance to PIs. The median baseline HIV RNA level was 4.9 log10 copies/ml, and the median CD4 count was 87 cells/mm3. At the baseline, the median numbers of resistance mutations were as follows: 3 DRV resistance mutations, 4 major PI resistance mutations, and 10 minor PI resistance mutations. The most common mutations that emerged at rebound included V32I (44%), I54M/L (24%), L33F (25%), I84V (21%), and L89V (12%). Multivariate analysis showed that higher baseline HIV RNA levels and smaller numbers of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor simultaneously used with DRV were associated with a higher risk of DRV resistance mutation selection. By contrast, L76V, a known DRV resistance mutation, was found to decrease the risk of selection of another DRV resistance mutation. The occurrence of virological failure while a patient was on DRV was associated with the selection of mutations that increased the level of DRV resistance without affecting susceptibility to tipranavir (TPV). In these PI-treated patients who displayed treatment failure while they were on a DRV-containing regimen, we confirmed the set of emerging mutations associated with DRV failure and identified the factors associated with the selection of these mutations. TPV susceptibility does not seem to be affected by the selection of a DRV resistance mutation.

[1]  Deenan Pillay,et al.  Update of the drug resistance mutations in HIV-1: Fall 2006. , 2006, Topics in HIV medicine : a publication of the International AIDS Society, USA.

[2]  Dirk Jochmans,et al.  TMC114, a Novel Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Inhibitor Active against Protease Inhibitor-Resistant Viruses, Including a Broad Range of Clinical Isolates , 2005, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[3]  J. Weber,et al.  Emergence of resistant variants of HIV in vivo during monotherapy with the proteinase inhibitor saquinavir. , 1997, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[4]  J. Condra,et al.  In vivo emergence of HIV-1 variants resistant to multiple protease inhibitors , 1995, Nature.

[5]  V. Calvez,et al.  Resistance profiles observed in virological failures after 24 weeks of amprenavir/ritonavir containing regimen in protease inhibitor experienced patients , 2004, Journal of medical virology.

[6]  C. Petropoulos,et al.  Loss of antiretroviral drug susceptibility at low viral load during early virological failure in treatment-experienced patients , 2000, AIDS.

[7]  R. Haubrich,et al.  Week 24 efficacy and safety of TMC114/ritonavir in treatment-experienced HIV patients , 2007, AIDS.

[8]  Jonathan M. Schapiro,et al.  Genotypic Changes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Associated with Reduced Susceptibility and Virologic Response to the Protease Inhibitor Tipranavir , 2006, Journal of Virology.

[9]  R. Swanstrom,et al.  Human immunodeficiency virus type-1 protease inhibitors: therapeutic successes and failures, suppression and resistance. , 2000, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[10]  C. Katlama,et al.  Efficacy and safety of TMC114/ritonavir in treatment-experienced HIV patients: 24-week results of POWER 1 , 2007, AIDS.

[11]  R. Haubrich,et al.  Efficacy and safety of darunavir-ritonavir at week 48 in treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection in POWER 1 and 2: a pooled subgroup analysis of data from two randomised trials , 2007, The Lancet.

[12]  R. Elston,et al.  Emergence of Resistance to Protease Inhibitor Amprenavir in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Patients: Selection of Four Alternative Viral Protease Genotypes and Influence of Viral Susceptibility to Coadministered Reverse Transcriptase Nucleoside Inhibitors , 2002, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[13]  D. R. Kuritzkes,et al.  Genotypic and Phenotypic Characterization of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Variants Isolated from Patients Treated with the Protease Inhibitor Nelfinavir , 1998, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[14]  Richard A. Rode,et al.  Identification of Genotypic Changes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protease That Correlate with Reduced Susceptibility to the Protease Inhibitor Lopinavir among Viral Isolates from Protease Inhibitor-Experienced Patients , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[15]  A. Molla,et al.  Recent developments in HIV protease inhibitor therapy. , 1998, Antiviral research.

[16]  R. Schooley,et al.  Genotypic and phenotypic analyses of HIV-1 in antiretroviral-experienced patients treated with tenofovir DF , 2002, AIDS.

[17]  D. Ho,et al.  Ordered accumulation of mutations in HIV protease confers resistance to ritonavir , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[18]  P. Kissinger,et al.  Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  M. Ott,et al.  In vivo resistance to a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proteinase inhibitor: mutations, kinetics, and frequencies. , 1996, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[20]  J. Stockman Efficacy and safety of darunavir-ritonavir at week 48 in treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection in POWER 1 and 2: a pooled subgroup analysis of data from two randomised trials , 2009 .

[21]  Tommy F. Liu,et al.  HIV-1 Protease and reverse-transcriptase mutations: correlations with antiretroviral therapy in subtype B isolates and implications for drug-resistance surveillance. , 2005, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[22]  G. Satten,et al.  Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Celia A. Schiffer,et al.  Structural and Thermodynamic Basis for the Binding of TMC114, a Next-Generation Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Inhibitor , 2004, Journal of Virology.

[24]  D. Richman,et al.  2022 update of the drug resistance mutations in HIV-1. , 2022, Topics in antiviral medicine.

[25]  R. Shafer,et al.  Genotypic predictors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  S. Hammer,et al.  Antiretroviral drug resistance testing in adult HIV-1 infection: recommendations of an International AIDS Society-USA Panel. , 2000, JAMA.

[27]  C. Delaugerre,et al.  Key amprenavir resistance mutations counteract dramatic efficacy of darunavir in highly experienced patients , 2007, AIDS (London).

[28]  Amalio Telenti,et al.  Update of the drug resistance mutations in HIV-1: Fall 2005. , 2005, Topics in HIV medicine : a publication of the International AIDS Society, USA.

[29]  J. Mellors,et al.  3-Year Suppression of HIV Viremia with Indinavir, Zidovudine, and Lamivudine , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[30]  A. Molla,et al.  Identification and Structural Characterization of I84C and I84A Mutations That Are Associated with High-Level Resistance to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protease Inhibitors and Impair Viral Replication , 2006, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[31]  A. Molla,et al.  Selection of Resistance in Protease Inhibitor-Experienced, Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Subjects Failing Lopinavir- and Ritonavir-Based Therapy: Mutation Patterns and Baseline Correlates , 2005, Journal of Virology.

[32]  L J Davis,et al.  Active human immunodeficiency virus protease is required for viral infectivity. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.