Shape and Form Optimization of On-Line Pressure-Compensating Drip Emitters to Achieve Lower Activation Pressure

This study presents the design and validation of on-line pressurecompensating (PC) drip irrigation emitters with a substantially lower minimum compensating inlet pressure (MCIP) than commercially available products. A reduced MCIP, or activation pressure, results in a drip irrigation system that can operate at a reduced pumping pressure, has lower power and energy requirements, requires a lower initial capital cost, and facilitates solarpowered irrigation systems. The technology presented herein can help spread drip irrigation to remote regions and contribute to reducing poverty, particularly in developing countries. The activation pressures of drip emitters at three flow rates were minimized using a genetic algorithm (GA)-based optimization method coupled with a recently published fluid–structure interaction analytical model of on-line PC drip emitter performance. The optimization took into account manufacturing constraints and the need to economically retrofit existing machines to manufacture new emitters. Optimized PC drip emitter designs with flow rates of 3.3, 4.2, and 8.2 lph were validated using precision machined prototype emitters. The activation pressure for all was 0.2 bar, which is as low as 16.7% that of commercial products. A limited production run of injection molded 8.2 lph dripper prototypes demonstrated they could be made with conventional manufacturing techniques. These drippers had an activation pressure of 0.15 bar. A cost analysis showed that low MCIP drip emitters can reduce the cost of solar-powered drip irrigation systems by up to 40%. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4038211]

[1]  O. Dubois,et al.  The state of the world's land and water resources for food and agriculture: managing systems at risk. , 2011 .

[2]  Amos G. Winter,et al.  A Mathematical Model for Pressure Compensating Emitters , 2015, DAC 2015.

[3]  X. Irz,et al.  Agricultural Productivity Growth and Poverty Alleviation , 2001 .

[4]  Mazher Iqbal,et al.  Evaluation Of Comparative Water Use Efficiency Of Furrow And Drip Irrigation Systems For Off-Season Vegetables Under Plastic Tunnel , 2014 .

[5]  Ruo-Qian Wang,et al.  Modeling the future of irrigation: A parametric description of pressure compensating drip irrigation emitter performance , 2017, PloS one.

[6]  J. Makoi,et al.  Low - Cost Irrigation Technology, in the Context of Sustainable Land Management and Adaptation to Climate Change in the Kilimanjaro Region , 2015 .

[7]  M. Kay,et al.  Irrigation Water Management: Training Manual No. 5: Irrigation methods , 1985 .

[8]  Joe Dewbre,et al.  Economic Importance of Agriculture for Poverty Reduction , 2010 .

[9]  Agriculture Census Division GoI,et al.  All India Report on Number and Area of Operational Holdings , 2015 .

[10]  R. Namara,et al.  Adoption and impacts of microirrigation technologies: empirical results from selected localities of Maharashtra and Gujarat states of India , 2005 .

[11]  Ernie Appleton,et al.  Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly , 2008 .

[12]  R. K. Sivanappan,et al.  Prospects of micro-irrigation in India , 1994 .

[13]  Jenifer Piesse,et al.  The Impact of Research Led Agricultural Productivity Growth on Poverty Reduction in Africa, Asia and Latin America , 2003 .

[14]  Tim A. Osswald,et al.  Injection molding handbook , 2008 .

[15]  Xavier Irz,et al.  Is agriculture the engine of growth , 2006 .