Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT Studies: Balancing Patient Exposure and Image Noise

Objectives:To establish the essential basis for balancing the dose versus noise trade-off in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) CT by means of a phantom study. Materials and Methods:Measurements were performed at a 64-section dual-source system, using the default protocols for DCE imaging (40 scans) of the trunk (current-time product per scan, 100 mAs; voltage, 120 kVp; pixel size, 0.9 × 0.9 × 8 mm3; CTDIvol per examination, 264 mGy) and head (270 mAs, 80 kVp, 0.45 × 0.45 × 8 mm3, 429 mGy). For 3 representative sections of an anthropomorphic phantom (head, upper abdomen, pelvis) transaxial dose distributions were measured by thermoluminescent dosimeters. The image noise was determined for 5 values of the current-time product (but otherwise identical parameter settings) and 4 pixel resolutions at a water-filled trunk and head phantom. Results:Highest exposures occurred at the periphery of the trunk and head with maximum skin entrance doses of about 300 mGy. Effective doses related to the 3 exposure scenarios were between 4 and 20 mSv, but were not at all predictive of local exposure levels. The image noise was inversely proportional to the square root of the current-time product and, with restrictions, to the pixel size. Noise levels determined for the standard settings were 13.8 HU (trunk) and 4.4 HU (head) and thus comparable with the contrast enhancement typically detected in tumors and ischemic brain tissues, respectively. Conclusions:The opposing requirements of risk and noise limitation in DCE-CT cannot be balanced without substantially reducing the spatial resolution. But even so, local radiation exposures are rather high for a diagnostic procedure. Indications to perform a DCE examination should thus be strictly limited to patients who really benefit from it.

[1]  M. Bahner,et al.  Regional blood flow, capillary permeability, and compartmental volumes: measurement with dynamic CT--initial experience. , 1999, Radiology.

[2]  F R Verdun,et al.  Using 80 kVp versus 120 kVp in perfusion CT measurement of regional cerebral blood flow. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  P. Turski,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in time-resolved CT angiography using highly constrained back projection reconstruction. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  K. Miles,et al.  Measurement of tissue perfusion by dynamic computed tomography. , 1991, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  Icrp.  1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , 1991 .

[6]  G. Brix,et al.  Assessment of a theoretical formalism for dose estimation in CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study , 2004, European Radiology.

[7]  H. Nagel,et al.  CT-Expo - ein neuartiges Programm zur Dosisevaluierung in der CT , 2002 .

[8]  Icrp.  Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60 , 1991 .

[9]  G. Brix,et al.  Pharmacokinetic analysis of tissue microcirculation using nested models: multimodel inference and parameter identifiability. , 2009, Medical physics.

[10]  L. Axel.  Cerebral blood flow determination by rapid-sequence computed tomography: theoretical analysis. , 1980, Radiology.

[11]  Kenya Murase,et al.  Effect of x-ray tube current on the accuracy of cerebral perfusion parameters obtained by CT perfusion studies , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Ting-Yim Lee,et al.  An Adiabatic Approximation to the Tissue Homogeneity Model for Water Exchange in the Brain: I. Theoretical Derivation , 1998, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[13]  J. Hendry,et al.  Radiobiology for the Radiologist , 1979, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  J. Zoetelief,et al.  Recommendations for patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology using TLD. Topical report , 2000 .

[15]  M. König,et al.  Image quality in CT perfusion imaging of the brain , 2006, European Radiology.

[16]  Hiroshi Niimi,et al.  Radiation-induced temporary hair loss as a radiation damage only occurring in patients who had the combination of MDCT and DSA , 2004, European Radiology.

[17]  S Rees,et al.  Measurement of tissue perfusion by dynamic computed tomography. , 1992, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  Jacob Geleijns,et al.  X-ray imaging and the skin: radiation biology, patient dosimetry and observed effects. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[19]  Afra M. Wohlschläger,et al.  CT-perfusion imaging of the human brain: Advanced deconvolution analysis using circulant singular value decomposition , 2008, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[20]  C. Muirhead,et al.  Radiation Cataractogenesis: A Review of Recent Studies , 2009, Radiation research.

[21]  R. Brooks,et al.  Statistical limitations in x-ray reconstructive tomography. , 1976, Medical physics.

[22]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  Estimation of tissue perfusion by dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging: simulation-based evaluation of the steepest slope method , 2010, European Radiology.

[23]  Jack Valentin,et al.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.