Activity space estimation with longitudinal observations of social media data

In this paper, we demonstrate the use of an inexpensive and easy-to-collect long-term dataset to address the problems caused by basing activity space studies off short-term data. In total, we use 63,114 geo-tagged tweets from 116 unique users to create individuals’ activity spaces based on minimum bounding geometry (convex hull). By using polygon density maps of activity space, we found clear differences between weekday and weekend activity spaces, and were able to observe the growth trajectory of activity space over 17 weeks. In order to reflect the heterogeneous nature of spatial behavior and tweeting habits, we used Latent Class Analysis twice. First, to identify five unique patterns of location-based activity spaces that are different in shape and anchoring. Second, we identify three unique growth trajectories. The comparison among these latent growth trajectories shows that in order to capture the extent of activity spaces we need long time periods for some individuals and shorter periods of observation for others. We also show that past studies using a single digit number of weeks may not be sufficient to capture individuals’ activity space. The major activity locations identified using a multilevel latent class model, do not appear to be statistically related to the growth patterns of Twitter users activity spaces. The evidence here shows Twitter data can be a valuable complementary source of information for heterogeneity analysis in activity-based modeling and simulation.

[1]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  Incorporating space-time constraints and activity-travel time profiles in a multi-state supernetwork approach to individual activity-travel scheduling , 2013 .

[2]  M. Kwan Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework , 2010 .

[3]  Yali Chen,et al.  Feasibility of using time–space prism to represent available opportunities and choice sets for destination choice models in the context of dynamic urban environments , 2012 .

[4]  K. Goulias,et al.  Dynamic diurnal social taxonomy of urban environments using data from a geocoded time use activity-travel diary and point-based business establishment inventory , 2014 .

[5]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  Use of Social Media Data to Explore Crisis Informatics , 2014 .

[6]  M. Kwan Gis methods in time‐geographic research: geocomputation and geovisualization of human activity patterns , 2004 .

[7]  Ram M. Pendyala,et al.  Time Use and Travel Behavior in Space and Time , 2003 .

[8]  R. Golledge,et al.  Spatial Behavior: A Geographic Perspective , 1996 .

[9]  M. Kwan,et al.  Bringing Time Back In: A Study on the Influence of Travel Time Variations and Facility Opening Hours on Individual Accessibility , 2002 .

[10]  Torsten Hägerstraand WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .

[11]  Allan L. McCutcheon,et al.  Applied Latent Class Analysis: Basic Concepts and Procedures in Single- and Multiple-Group Latent Class Analysis , 2002 .

[12]  Jay Magidson,et al.  Technical Guide for Latent GOLD 5.1: Basic, Advanced, and Syntax 1 , 2016 .

[13]  Hongbo Yu,et al.  A GIS-based time-geographic approach of studying individual activities and interactions in a hybrid physical–virtual space , 2009 .

[14]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  An analysis of day-to-day variations in individual space-time accessibility , 2012 .

[15]  B. Muthén,et al.  Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study , 2007 .

[16]  T. Dejong,et al.  A comparison of three diversity indices based on their components of richness and evenness , 1975 .

[17]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  Measuring Space‐Time Accessibility Benefits within Transportation Networks: Basic Theory and Computational Procedures , 1999 .

[18]  Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al.  6. The Simultaneous Decision(s) about the Number of Lower- and Higher-Level Classes in Multilevel Latent Class Analysis , 2010 .

[19]  Mei-Po Kwan,et al.  Human Extensibility and Individual Hybrid-accessibility in Space-time: A Multi-scale Representation Using GIS , 2000 .

[20]  Martin Dijst,et al.  Two-earner families and their action spaces: A case study of two dutch communities , 1999 .

[21]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Activity spaces: Measures of social exclusion? , 2003 .

[22]  M. Kwan Gender and Individual Access to Urban Opportunities: A Study Using Space–Time Measures , 1999 .

[23]  Rob Hranac,et al.  Twitter Interactions as a Data Source for Transportation Incidents , 2013 .

[24]  Gudmundur F. Ulfarsson,et al.  Activity Space of Older and Working-Age Adults in the Puget Sound Region, Washington , 2015 .

[25]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Time-space constraints and the formation of trip chains , 1987 .

[26]  L. Burns Transportation, temporal, and spatial components of accessibility , 1979 .

[27]  Yingling Fan,et al.  Urban Form, Individual Spatial Footprints, and Travel , 2008 .

[28]  Pavlos S. Kanaroglou,et al.  Urban Form and Household Activity‐Travel Behavior , 2006 .

[29]  R. Jennrich,et al.  Measurement of non-circular home range. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  K. Goulias,et al.  Impact of time-space prism accessibility on time use behavior and its propagation through intra-household interaction , 2010 .

[31]  Kazuo Nishii,et al.  Trip linkages of urban railway commuters under time-space constraints : some empirical observations , 1992 .

[32]  Ryuichi Kitamura The Expanding Sphere of Travel Behaviour Research: Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research , 2009 .

[33]  Joseph L. Schofer,et al.  Role of Social Media in Communicating Transit Disruptions , 2014 .

[34]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  International Study of Current and Potential Social Media Applications in Unplanned Passenger Rail Disruptions , 2014 .

[35]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Development of Indicators of Opportunity-Based Accessibility , 2011 .

[36]  Joongheon Kim,et al.  Energy-efficient rate-adaptive GPS-based positioning for smartphones , 2010, MobiSys '10.

[37]  Torsten Hägerstrand REFLECTIONS ON “WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE?” , 1989 .

[38]  R. Kitamura,et al.  Stochastic Frontier Models of Prism Vertices , 2000 .

[39]  J. Vermunt,et al.  Latent class cluster analysis , 2002 .

[40]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Observing the rhythms of daily life: A six-week travel diary , 2002 .

[41]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  Can Twitter data be used to validate travel demand models , 2015 .

[42]  R. Kitamura,et al.  Impact of telecommuting on spatial and temporal patterns of household travel , 1991 .

[43]  N. Schuurman,et al.  Comparing circular and network buffers to examine the influence of land use on walking for leisure and errands , 2007, International journal of health geographics.

[44]  Toshiyuki Yamamoto,et al.  On the formulation of time-space prisms to model constraints on personal activity-travel engagement , 2002 .

[45]  M. Goodchild Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[46]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Analysing space-time behaviour: new approaches to old problems , 2002 .

[47]  Konstadinos G. Goulias,et al.  LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS OF ACTIVITY AND TRAVEL PATTERN DYNAMICS USING GENERALIZED MIXED MARKOV LATENT CLASS MODELS , 1999 .

[48]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  LIFE CYCLE AND HOUSEHOLD TIME-SPACE PATHS: EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION , 1982 .

[49]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  GIS Software for Measuring Space-Time Accessibility in Transportation Planning and Analysis , 2000, GeoInformatica.

[50]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  BASIC PROPERTIES OF URBAN TIME-SPACE PATHS: EMPIRICAL TESTS , 1981 .

[51]  Y. Susilo,et al.  Analysis of Day-to-Day Variability in an Individual's Action Space: Exploration of 6-Week Mobidrive Travel Diary Data , 2005 .

[52]  Stefan Schönfelder,et al.  Capturing Human Activity Spaces , 2007 .

[53]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems , 1991, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[54]  R. Kitamura,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Time-Space Prism Vertices for Out-of-Home Activity Engagement on Working and Nonworking Days , 2004 .

[55]  M. Kwan Gender, the Home-Work Link, and Space-Time Patterns of Nonemployment Activities , 1999 .

[56]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Accessibility in space and time: A theme in spatially integrated social science , 2003, J. Geogr. Syst..

[57]  B. J. Worton,et al.  A review of models of home range for animal movement , 1987 .