Evolution of Strategic Management: The Need for New Dominant Designs

The development of strategic management is explained from an evolutionary perspective on the basis of cycles of variation, selection and retention. In industry, breakthrough innovations, or technological discontinuities, initiate eras of ferment that end when a generally accepted standard, or dominant design, starts an era of incremental change. In strategic management, the original definition of strategy initiated an era of ferment characterized by a focus on the environment. The attention to the environment of firms and the integration with other areas of inquiry reached a point of maturity with development of a widely accepted model for analyzing industry and with the definition of generic strategies. The resource-based view of the firm created a new era of ferment by affirming that the main sources of sustainable competitive advantages reside in the development and use of valuable resources. A new period, marked by swift advances in technology and increasingly blurred boundaries among industries, markets and competitors as well as diverse and more complex sources of competitive advantages, imposes on scholars and practitioners an imperative need to conceive new dominant designs. This paper illustrates the evolution toward new directions and challenges of creating new dominant paradigms in strategic management that revolve around the concepts of knowledge, learning, and innovation.

[1]  D. Teece Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions , 2000 .

[2]  D. Schendel,et al.  Business Policy or Strategic Management: A Broader View for an Emerging Discipline. Paper No. 371. , 1972 .

[3]  Marleen Huysman,et al.  Balancing Biases, A Critical Review of the Literature on Organizational Learning , 1998 .

[4]  Hammad Akbar,et al.  Knowledge Levels and Their Transformation: Towards the Integration of Knowledge Creation and Individual Learning , 2003 .

[5]  M. Hitt,et al.  The new competitive landscape , 1995 .

[6]  Robin Wensley,et al.  In Search of the Market Share Effect. , 1981 .

[7]  J. P. Andrew,et al.  Innovating for cash. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[8]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  TESTING A MODEL OF REASONED RISK-TAKING: GOVERNANCE, THE EXPERIENCE OF PRINCIPALS AND AGENTS, AND GLOBAL STRATEGY IN HIGH-TECHNOLOGY IPO FIRMS , 2003 .

[9]  John D Wolpert,et al.  Breaking out of the innovation box. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[10]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Disentangling the Theories of Firm Boundaries: A Path Model and Empirical Test , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[11]  K. R. Harrigan Barriers to entry and competitive strategies , 1981 .

[12]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[13]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[15]  Paul DiMaggio Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[16]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  Multiple point competition , 1985 .

[17]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Guanxi and organizational dynamics: organizational networking in Chinese firms , 2001 .

[18]  G. Hamel Leading the Revolution , 2000 .

[19]  Donald D. Bergh,et al.  Assessment and redirection of longitudinal analysis : Demonstration with a study of the diversification and divestiture relationship , 1997 .

[20]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Ecological models of organizations , 1988 .

[21]  C. Oliver SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[22]  A SchillingMelissa,et al.  Disentangling the Theories of Firm Boundaries , 2002 .

[23]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[24]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[25]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[26]  R. Rumelt Strategy, structure, and economic performance , 1974 .

[27]  H. Igor Ansoff,et al.  The emerging paradigm of strategic behavior , 1987 .

[28]  Y. Doz The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? , 2007 .

[29]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[30]  R. Daft,et al.  Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer Between Practitioners and Academics , 2001 .

[31]  E. Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[32]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[33]  T. Davenport,et al.  Just-in-time delivery comes to knowledge management. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[34]  Erwin Danneels The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[35]  E. L. Cox,et al.  Guest editors\' introduction to the special issue: why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity , 2003 .

[36]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[37]  David J. Collis,et al.  Corporate Strategy : Resources and the Scope of the Firm , 1996 .

[38]  M. Lieberman The learning curve, diffusion, and competitive strategy , 1987 .

[39]  On the Theory of Oligopoly , 1958 .

[40]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Cooperative Versus Competitive Structures in Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms , 1992 .

[41]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[42]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[43]  Gerard P. Hodgkinson,et al.  The Competent Organization: A Psychological Analysis of the Strategic Management Process , 2002 .

[44]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[45]  Abdul A. Rasheed,et al.  Diversification and Performance: Critical Review and Future Directions* , 1991 .

[46]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[47]  K.M. Sutcliffe,et al.  The high cost of accurate knowledge , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[48]  Henry Mintzberg Patterns in Strategy Formation , 1978, International Studies of Management & Organization.

[49]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Antecedents and Performance Outcomes of Diversification: A Review and Critique of Theoretical Perspectives , 1990 .

[50]  J. Robins,et al.  A resource‐based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance , 1995 .

[51]  Donald E. Hatfield,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING ON AGGREGATE INDUSTRY SPECIALIZATION , 1996 .

[52]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Knowledge‐based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐sized businesses , 2003 .

[53]  Robert S Kaplan,et al.  Expensing stock options: a fair-value approach. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[54]  Y. Alex Tung,et al.  Using Neural Network Analysis to Uncover the Trace Effects of National Culture , 2000 .

[55]  Bruce C. Skaggs,et al.  STRATEGIC POSITIONING, HUMAN CAPITAL AND PERFORMANCE IN SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS: A CUSTOMER INTERACTION APPROACH , 2003 .

[56]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Interdependence and Adaptability: Organizational Learning and the Long - Term Effect of Integration , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[57]  Jeremy Hope,et al.  Competing in the Third Wave: The Ten Key Management Issues of the Information Age , 1997 .

[58]  Alexandre B. Lopes,et al.  The Knowing-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action , 1999 .

[59]  J. Child Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[60]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[61]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[62]  Josiah Ober,et al.  Beyond empowerment: building a company of citizens. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[63]  S. Kotha Mass customization: Implementing the emerging paradigm for competitive advantage , 1995 .

[64]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Organizations and Environments , 1979 .

[65]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Resource-Based View of the Firm in Two Environments: The Hollywood Film Studios From 1936 to 1965 , 1996 .

[66]  Joan C. Woodward Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice , 1966 .

[67]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The New Frontier of Experience Innovation , 2003 .

[68]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  Data analytic trends and training in strategic management , 2003 .

[69]  Darrell Rigby,et al.  Open-market innovation. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[70]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Hypercompetition in a Multimarket Environment: The Role of Strategic Similarity and Multimarket Contact in Competitive De-Escalation , 1996 .

[71]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[72]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Porter's ‘competitive advantage of nations’: An assessment , 1991 .

[73]  Alfred D. Chandler Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise , 1962 .

[74]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers , 1999 .

[75]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Strategic management: From informed conversation to academic discipline , 2002 .

[76]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Current and Future Research Methods in Strategic Management , 1998 .

[77]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum , 1999 .

[78]  David Lei,et al.  Dynamic Core Competences through Meta-Learning and Strategic Context , 1996 .

[79]  Diana Farrell,et al.  The real new economy. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[80]  Charles W. Hofer,et al.  Strategic management : a new view of business policy and planning , 1980 .

[81]  R. Coase The Nature of The Firm - Influence , 1988 .

[82]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[83]  Anne Sigismund Huff,et al.  1999 Presidential Address: Changes in Organizational Knowledge Production , 2000 .

[84]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Research that reinvents the corporation , 1991 .

[85]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[86]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[87]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[88]  Moshe Farjoun Towards an organic perspective on strategy , 2002 .

[89]  David B. Jemison The Importance of an Integrative Approach To Strategic Management Research , 1981 .

[90]  G. Stalk,et al.  Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[91]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[92]  E. Fama,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[93]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[94]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[95]  H. H. Newman Strategic groups and the structure-performance relationship : a study with respect to the chemical process industries , 1979 .

[96]  Kent D. Miller Knowledge inventories and managerial myopia , 2002 .

[97]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[98]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Winning through innovation , 1997 .

[99]  S. Thomke R&D comes to services. Bank of America's pathbreaking experiments. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[100]  J. L. Bower,et al.  Business policy: text and cases , 1973 .

[101]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[102]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .