Commuting by Bicycle: An Overview of the Literature

Abstract Commuting by bicycle has advantages over other modes of transport, both for the commuter and for society. Although cycling is an option for many commuters, a considerable number of them choose to use other forms of transport. In order to underpin policies that promote commuting by bicycle, this paper investigates the determinants for commuting to work. As many bicycle commuters do not cycle every day, we also examine people’s daily choices, in terms of frequency. We conducted a survey of the current literature in order to identify the determinants for commuting by bicycle. We found many determinants, not all of which are addressed by conventional mode choice studies and models. This suggests that predicting and influencing bicycle use needs to be grounded in other kinds of knowledge than those currently available for motorized forms of transport.

[1]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  Short-run and long-run policies for increasing bicycle transportation for daily commuter trips , 1995 .

[2]  Gary Barnes,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis of Effect of Bicycle Facilities on Commute Mode Share , 2006 .

[3]  Theodore Anton Petritsch,et al.  Sidepath Safety Model Bicycle Sidepath Design Factors Affecting Crash Rates , 2006 .

[4]  E. K. Burns,et al.  Cycling to Work in Phoenix: Route Choice, Travel Behavior, and Commuter Characteristics , 2001 .

[5]  R. Cervero,et al.  Travel Choices in Pedestrian Versus Automobile Oriented Neighborhoods - eScholarship , 1995 .

[6]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices , 1997 .

[7]  Mark Wardman,et al.  THE UK NATIONAL CYCLING STRATEGY: CAN IMPROVED FACILITIES MEET THE TARGETS? , 1997 .

[8]  K. Krizek.  Two Approaches to Valuing Some of Bicycle Facilities' Presumed Benefits: Propose a session for the 2007 National Planning Conference in the City of Brotherly Love , 2006 .

[9]  A. Cheadle,et al.  Cycling and the Built Environment, a US Perspective , 2005 .

[10]  R. Cervero.  MIXED LAND-USES AND COMMUTING: EVIDENCE FROM THE AMERICAN HOUSING SURVEY , 1996 .

[11]  R. Kitamura,et al.  A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[12]  H. M. Zhang,et al.  On optimal freeway ramp control policies for congested traffic corridors , 1999 .

[13]  John E Abraham,et al.  Influences on bicycle use , 2007 .

[14]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Is Average Daily Travel Time Expenditure Constant? In Search of Explanations for an Increase in Average Travel Time , 2006 .

[15]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[16]  Arthur Christian Nelson,et al.  If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them: Association Between Bicycle Facilities and Bicycle Commuting , 1997 .

[17]  Jane C. Stutts,et al.  BICYCLE-MOTOR VEHICLE CRASH TYPES: THE EARLY 1990S , 1995 .

[18]  Karel Martens,et al.  Promoting Bike-and-Ride: The Dutch Experience , 2007 .

[19]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[20]  D. G. Davies,et al.  The impact of weather on cycle flows , 1998 .

[21]  V. E. Daniel,et al.  Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter? , 2004 .

[22]  Jorge Gil,et al.  Space Syntax: The Role of Urban Form in Cyclist Route Choice in Central London , 2007 .

[23]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework , 2002 .

[24]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them , 2003 .

[25]  S. Bamberg.  Is a Residential Relocation a Good Opportunity to Change People’s Travel Behavior? Results From a Theory-Driven Intervention Study , 2006 .

[26]  Jon D Fricker,et al.  Network Evaluation Tool to Improve Real and Perceived Bicycle Safety , 2007 .

[27]  C. Klöckner,et al.  Travel Mode Choice of Women , 2002 .

[28]  J. Parkin,et al.  Barriers to cycling: an exploration of quantitative analyses , 2007 .

[29]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Effect of the Built Environment on Motorized and Non-Motorized Trip Making: Substitutive, Complementary, or Synergistic? , 2007 .

[30]  M. Wardman,et al.  Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data , 2007 .

[31]  M. Southworth.  Designing the Walkable City , 2005 .

[32]  K. Krizek,et al.  Gender Differences in Bicycling Behavior and Facility Preferences , 2005 .

[33]  T. Litman,et al.  Land Use Impacts on Transport , 2005 .

[34]  P. Plaut.  Non-motorized commuting in the US , 2005 .

[35]  W. Moritz.  Adult Bicyclists in the United States: Characteristics and Riding Experience in 1996 , 1998 .

[36]  John Pucher,et al.  URBAN TRANSPORT IN GERMANY: PROVIDING FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE CAR. , 1998 .

[37]  Andreas Matzarakis,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF WEATHER ON FREQUENCIES OF USE BY COMMUTING AND RECREATION BICYCLISTS , 2004 .

[38]  S. Handy,et al.  Factors associated with bicycle ownership and use: a study of six small U.S. cities , 2010 .

[39]  I. M. Bernhoft,et al.  Preferences and behaviour of pedestrians and cyclists by age and gender , 2008 .

[40]  Tim Ryley.  Translating cycling policy into cycling practice , 2001 .

[41]  J. Pucher,et al.  Bicycling renaissance in North America? Recent trends and alternative policies to promote bicycling , 1999 .

[42]  Birgitta Gatersleben,et al.  Contemplating Cycling to Work: Attitudes and Perceptions in Different Stages of Change , 2007 .

[43]  Daniel A. Rodriguez,et al.  The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment , 2004 .

[44]  A. Bergström,et al.  Potential of transferring car trips to bicycle during winter , 2003 .

[45]  J. Thøgersen,et al.  To What Degree are Environmentally Beneficial Choices Reflective of a General Conservation Stance? , 2006 .

[46]  Tim Ryley,et al.  Use of non-motorised modes and life stage in Edinburgh , 2006 .

[47]  P. Rietveld,et al.  How do people get to the railway station? The dutch experience , 2000 .

[48]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Analysis of Stated Preferences for Intermodal Bicycle-Transit Interfaces , 1996 .

[49]  D. Uzzell,et al.  Affective Appraisals of the Daily Commute , 2007 .

[50]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  What Affects Commute Mode Choice: Neighborhood Physical Structure or Preferences Toward Neighborhoods? , 2005 .

[51]  H Summala,et al.  Attention and expectation problems in bicycle-car collisions: an in-depth study. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[52]  Chris Shaw,et al.  Sustainable Commuting: A Contradiction In Terms? , 1999 .

[53]  Kevin J. Krizek,et al.  Analysing the benefits and costs of bicycle facilities via online guidelines , 2007 .

[54]  J. Fajans,et al.  WHY BICYCLISTS HATE STOP SIGNS , 2001 .

[55]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Personal, family, social, and environmental correlates of active commuting to school. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[56]  P Insall,et al.  The challenges of evaluating environmental interventions to increase population levels of physical activity: the case of the UK National Cycle Network , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[57]  Robert J. Schneider,et al.  Avoiding Biased Interpretation of Bicycle Surveys , 2006 .

[58]  D. Niemeier,et al.  Bicycle Journey-to-Work: Travel Behavior Characteristics and Spatial Attributes , 1997 .

[59]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Factors Affecting Bicycling Demand , 2007 .

[60]  Claire E McKnight,et al.  Does the built environment make a difference? Additional evidence from the daily activity and travel behavior of homemakers living in New York City and suburbs , 2007 .

[61]  Geoffrey Rose,et al.  Combining intercept surveys and a self-completion questionnaire to understand cyclist use of off-road paths , 2007 .

[62]  Karel Martens,et al.  The bicycle as a feedering mode: experiences from three European countries , 2004 .

[63]  J. Brug,et al.  Determinants of adolescent bicycle use for transportation and snacking behavior. , 2005, Preventive medicine.

[64]  Michael Duncan,et al.  Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[65]  Kevin J. Krizek,et al.  What is at the end of the road? Understanding discontinuities of on-street bicycle lanes in urban settings , 2005 .

[66]  Randall Crane,et al.  The Influence of Urban Form on Travel: An Interpretive Review , 2000 .

[67]  Frank Witlox,et al.  Evaluating bicycle-car transport mode competitiveness in an urban environment. An activity-based approach , 2004 .

[68]  H C Triandis,et al.  Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. , 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[69]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Commuter Bicyclist Route Choice: Analysis Using a Stated Preference Survey , 2003 .

[70]  J. Zacharias.  Non-motorized transportation in four Shanghai districts , 2005 .

[71]  D. Levinson,et al.  TRAILS, LANES, OR TRAFFIC: VALUING BICYCLE FACILITIES WITH AN ADAPTIVE STATED PREFERENCE SURVEY , 2007 .

[72]  C. Bhat,et al.  Frequency of Bicycle Commuting: Internet-Based Survey Analysis , 2004 .

[73]  G. Rose,et al.  Promoting transportation cycling for women: the role of bicycle infrastructure. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[74]  A. El-geneidy,et al.  Predicting Bicycle Travel Speeds Along Different Facilities Using GPS Data: A Proof-of-Concept Model , 2007 .

[75]  A A Parker.  THE DUTCH MODEL FOR MAKING WALKING AND CYCLING SAFER , 2000 .

[76]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Incentives, Morality, Or Habit? Predicting Students’ Car Use for University Routes With the Models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis , 2003 .

[77]  Hirotaka Koike,et al.  Research on the Unevenness of Intersection Pavement on Bicycle Safety , 2003 .

[78]  John Pucher,et al.  Why Canadians cycle more than Americans: A comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies , 2006 .

[79]  Lisa Aultman-Hall,et al.  Analysis of Bicycle Commuter Routes Using Geographic Information Systems: Implications for Bicycle Planning , 1997 .

[80]  Robert J. Schneider,et al.  Avoiding Biased Interpretation of Bicycle Surveys: Comparing Results from Four Distribution Methods in Winston-Salem, North Carolina , 2006 .

[81]  Simon Kingham,et al.  Employer travel plans, cycling and gender: will travel plan measures improve the outlook for cycling to work in the UK? , 2003 .

[82]  M. Wardman,et al.  Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work , 2007 .

[83]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  An Analysis of Commuter Bicyclist Route Choice Using a Stated Preference Survey , 2003 .

[84]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Choice of Travel Mode in the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Roles of Past Behavior, Habit, and Reasoned Action , 2003 .

[85]  J. Sallis,et al.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[86]  John Pucher,et al.  Cycling safety on bikeways vs. roads , 2001 .

[87]  L. Frank,et al.  Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice , 2007 .

[88]  Christopher D Porter,et al.  Forecasting Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel: State of the Practice and Research Needs , 1999 .

[89]  S. Brody,et al.  Cycling and walking: Explaining the spatial distribution of healthy modes of transportation in the United States , 2008 .

[90]  Ilse de Bourdeaudhuij,et al.  Psychosocial and environmental factors associated with cycling for transport among a working population. , 2007, Health education research.

[91]  M. Nankervis,et al.  The effects of weather and climate on bicycle commuting , 1999 .

[92]  U Vandebona,et al.  Impact of trip purpose on acceptable access distance to bicycle parking facilities , 2003 .

[93]  E. Matthies,et al.  Responsibility and Environment , 2001 .

[94]  P Reitveld.  NON-MOTORISED MODES IN TRANSPORT SYSTEMS: A MULTIMODAL CHAIN PERSPECTIVE FOR THE NETHERLANDS , 2000 .

[95]  J. Scheiner,et al.  Travel mode choice: affected by objective or subjective determinants? , 2007 .

[96]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany , 2008 .

[97]  G. Rose,et al.  Travel behaviour change impacts of a major ride to work day event , 2007 .

[98]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  The accessibility of railway stations: the role of the bicycle in The Netherlands , 2000 .

[99]  Tobias Heldt,et al.  Latent Variables in a Travel Mode Choice Model: Attitudinal and Behavioural Indicator Variables , 2005 .

[100]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Effect of the Built Environment on Motorized and Nonmotorized Trip Making , 2007 .

[101]  F. Bull,et al.  Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[102]  C. Bhat,et al.  A Comparison of the Route Preferences of Experienced and Inexperienced Bicycle Commuters , 2005 .