BCVR: A methodological framework for industrial performance management and decision-support

The necessity to simultaneously satisfy different stakeholders' objectives in an industrial project or in a process requires efficient performance management for decision-making. With the characteristics of multi-dimensions and dynamic nature of performance and the proliferation of evaluation criteria, the design and construction of performance measurement and management systems are facing new challenges. However, none of the existing methodologies and tools can globally satisfy this expectation. In this context, a new methodological framework, named BCVR, has been developed to help decision-makers in performance management and decision-making processes on the basis of four assessment dimensions, namely: benefit, cost, value and risk. In this paper, the basic concepts and the main mechanisms of the proposed framework are presented with an illustration about supplier selection risk assessment in a typical supply chain process.

[1]  Bonifacio Llamazares,et al.  Constructing Choquet integral-based operators that generalize weighted means and OWA operators , 2015, Inf. Fusion.

[2]  K. Merchant,et al.  Management Control Systems: Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives , 2003 .

[3]  Sharon M. Ordoobadi.  Application of AHP and Taguchi loss functions in evaluation of advanced manufacturing technologies , 2013, 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM).

[4]  L. Shah,et al.  Value-risk based performance evaluation of industrial systems , 2012 .

[5]  P. Taticchi.  Business Performance Measurement and Management , 2010 .

[6]  Pierre-Laurent Bescos,et al.  Contrôle de gestion et management , 1993 .

[7]  Richard J. Mayer,et al.  Information Integration for Concurrent Engineering (IICE) IDEF3 Process Description Capture Method Report , 1992 .

[8]  Steve Mason,et al.  Towards a definition of a business performance measurement system , 2007 .

[9]  Lamia Berrah,et al.  Towards an aggregation performance measurement system model in a supply chain context , 2007, Comput. Ind..

[10]  L. Whitman,et al.  Methodology to mitigate supplier risk in an aerospace supply chain , 2004 .

[11]  J. R. Carter,et al.  An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques , 2004 .

[12]  D. Neiger,et al.  Supply chain risk identification with value-focused process engineering , 2009 .

[13]  P. Garengo,et al.  Performance Measurement Systems in SMEs: A Review for a Research Agenda , 2005 .

[14]  François B. Vernadat,et al.  Enterprise Modelling and Integration , 2002, ICEIMT.

[15]  Ali Siadat,et al.  VR-PMS: a new approach for performance measurement and management of industrial systems , 2013 .

[16]  Lamia Berrah,et al.  Global vision and performance indicators for an industrial improvement approach , 2000 .

[17]  Erkki K. Laitinen,et al.  Influence of cost accounting change on performance of manufacturing firms , 2014 .

[18]  Roger Atkinson,et al.  Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria , 1999 .

[19]  Annick Bourguignon,et al.  Management accounting and value creation: the profit and loss of reification , 2005 .

[20]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[21]  Amadou Sienou.  Proposition d'un cadre méthodologique pour le management intégré des risques et des processus d'entreprise , 2009 .

[22]  James Nga-Kwok Liu,et al.  Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  R. J. Mayer,et al.  Information integration for concurrent engineering (IICE) , 1995 .

[24]  Raúl Rodríguez Rodríguez,et al.  Aggregation of performance measures for supporting decision makers , 2010 .