Using field data to test locust migratory band collective movement models

Wingless locust nymphs can form massive migratory groups known as bands, whose coordinated movement results from local interactions. We analysed the spatial distribution of locusts within naturally occurring bands and compared them with computer simulations to infer which interaction rules are used by individuals. We found that the empirical radial distribution of neighbours around a focal individual was isotropic, indicating a tendency for locusts to interact with neighbours all around them, rather than a bias towards pursuing individuals ahead or escaping from the ones following behind. By using maps of neighbour densities and pair correlation functions, we found evidence for a short-range repulsion force, balanced by a clustering force, presumably alignment and/or attraction, at a distance of around 3 cm. These results were similar to those observed when using a ‘zonal’ self-propelled particles model where repulsion/alignment/attraction forces are delimited by concentric circular zones of set radii. However, the profiles obtained either by using different combinations of forces, limiting the number of neighbours involved in interactions, or by varying the range of some zones, all appeared to produce similar results, thereby limiting the ability to more precisely determine the rules underlying locust interactions.

[1]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  I. Couzin,et al.  Cannibal crickets on a forced march for protein and salt. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Iman Borazjani,et al.  On the hydrodynamics of fish schooling , 2013 .

[4]  Stephen J. Simpson,et al.  Group structure in locust migratory bands , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  I. Couzin,et al.  Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Density distribution and size sorting in fish schools: an individual-based model , 2005 .

[7]  Pawel Romanczuk,et al.  Nutritional state and collective motion: from individuals to mass migration , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns , 1983 .

[10]  Sepideh Bazazi,et al.  Cannibalism in the lifeboat — collective movement in Australian plague locusts , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  Roman Garnett,et al.  Multi-scale Inference of Interaction Rules in Animal Groups Using Bayesian Model Selection , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.

[13]  Stephen J. Simpson,et al.  Locust Phase Polyphenism: An Update , 2009 .

[14]  T. Pitcher,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of fish schools , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  Philipp Berens,et al.  CircStat: AMATLABToolbox for Circular Statistics , 2009, Journal of Statistical Software.

[16]  K. Hanisch,et al.  Some remarks on estimators of the distribution function of nearest neighbour distance in stationary spatial point processes , 1984 .

[17]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[18]  D. Weihs.  Hydromechanics of Fish Schooling , 1973, Nature.

[19]  C. Ashall,et al.  Field Studies on diurnal Behaviour, Movement and Aggregation in the Desert Locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forskål). , 1957 .

[20]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Topological patterns in street networks of self-organized urban settlements , 2006 .

[21]  G. Balança,et al.  Behaviour of Rhammatocerus Schistocercoides (Rehn, 1906) hopper bands in Mato Grosso, Brazil (Orthoptera : Acrididae : Gomphocerinae) , 1999 .

[22]  M. Burrows,et al.  Spatiotemporal receptive field properties of a looming-sensitive neuron in solitarious and gregarious phases of the desert locust. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Inferring individual rules from collective behavior , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  Y. Tu,et al.  Moving and staying together without a leader , 2003, cond-mat/0401257.

[26]  Pawel Romanczuk,et al.  Collective motion due to individual escape and pursuit response. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[27]  Steven V. Viscido,et al.  The effect of population size and number of influential neighbors on the emergent properties of fish schools , 2005 .

[28]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  Collective Motion and Cannibalism in Locust Migratory Bands , 2008, Current Biology.

[29]  Boris Uvarov.  Behaviour, ecology, biogeography population dynamics , 1977 .

[30]  A. Czirók,et al.  Collective Motion , 1999, physics/9902023.

[31]  G. Parisi,et al.  Empirical investigation of starling flocks: a benchmark study in collective animal behaviour , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  B. Uvarov,et al.  Grasshoppers and locusts. A handbook of general acridology. Volume 2. Behaviour, ecology, biogeography, population dynamics. , 1977 .