Enhancing Online Community Activity: Development and validation of the CA framework

Factors contributing to development of active communities are identified and combined into the Community Activity framework, which is useful in setting up new, or revitalizing inactive, communities. Found factors include: notifying members of new messages by e-mail, having a news section, and ability to add pictures to member profiles. During application of the framework to an inactivecommunity,changeshavebeenmadetoprivacyoptions,polls,activitynotifications,andother areas. Significant positive effects have been found in the number of visits, volume of posted messages, and number of topics. Interest of community members in both user profiles and the message board increased significantly. We conclude that the Community Activity framework is able to contribute in developing active online communities.

[1]  S. R. Hiltz.  Online communities , 1983 .

[2]  K. Williams,et al.  Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Lurker demographics: counting the silent , 2000, CHI.

[4]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities , 2006, CHI.

[5]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Status Seeking and the Design of Online Entertainment Communities , 2007, Managing in the Information Economy.

[6]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community , 2005, TCHI.

[7]  Butler,et al.  The Dynamics of Cyberspace: Examining and Modelling Online Social Structure , 1999 .

[8]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  The role of message-sequences in the sustainability of an online support community for older people , 2010, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[9]  Fay Sudweeks,et al.  Networked Interactivity , 1997, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[10]  Laurie E. Damianos,et al.  Measuring the Success of On-line Communities in an Enterprise Networking Tool , 2011, HCI.

[11]  P. Kollock.  DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR ONLINE COMMUNITIES , 1997 .

[12]  J. Levine,et al.  Group Socialization: Theory and Research , 1994 .

[13]  David B Buller,et al.  Effect of Emailed Messages on Return Use of a Nutrition Education Website and Subsequent Changes in Dietary Behavior , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  R. Kraut,et al.  Introductions and Questions: Rhetorical Strategies That Elicit Response in Online Communities , 2007 .

[15]  S. Herring.  Computer-mediated communication : linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives , 1996 .

[16]  Constance Elise Porter,et al.  A Typology of Virtual Communities: A Multi-Disciplinary Foundation for Future Research , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Danyel Fisher,et al.  You Are Who You Talk To: Detecting Roles in Usenet Newsgroups , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[18]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .

[19]  Clare-Marie Karat,et al.  Evaluating assistance of natural language policy authoring , 2008, SOUPS '08.

[20]  Leanne Trembath,et al.  Determinants of success for online communities: an empirical study , 2011 .

[21]  P. Kollock,et al.  Managing the virtual commons : Cooperation and conflict in computer communities , 1996 .

[22]  De Liua,et al.  Status Seeking and the Design of Online Entertainment Communities , 2007 .

[23]  Sunanda Sangwan,et al.  Virtual Community Success: A Uses and Gratifications Perspective , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[24]  Itai Himelboim,et al.  Reply distribution in online discussions: A comparative network analysis of political and health newsgroups , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[25]  Jin Yong Park,et al.  What makes online community members commit? A social exchange perspective , 2010, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[26]  Sherri L. Jessmer,et al.  The effect of politeness and grammar on user perceptions of electronic mail. , 2001 .

[27]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Success factors of virtual communities from the perspective of members and operators: an empirical study , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[28]  L. Miller,et al.  Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  Jeff Yan,et al.  Usability of CAPTCHAs or usability issues in CAPTCHA design , 2008, SOUPS '08.

[30]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Determinants of success for online communities: an analysis of three communities in terms of members' perceived professional development , 2009, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[31]  John Langford,et al.  Telling humans and computers apart automatically , 2004, CACM.

[32]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Predicting Continued Participation in Newsgroups , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[33]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Online communities: a longitudinal analysis of communication activities , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[34]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  The effects of emotional icons on remote communication , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[35]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: a theoretical model and empirical exploration , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[36]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..