Evidence for Second-Order Singleton Suppression Based on Probabilistic Expectations
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Yuhong V. Jiang,et al. Rapid acquisition but slow extinction of an attentional bias in space , 2012 .
[2] Steven J. Luck,et al. The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[3] Leonardo Chelazzi,et al. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering , 2017, Cortex.
[4] Bo-Yeong Won,et al. Learned Suppression for Multiple Distractors in Visual Search , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[5] R. Remington,et al. Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[6] Jan Theeuwes,et al. How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[7] Ali Mazaheri,et al. Pre-Stimulus Activity Predicts the Winner of Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Attentional Selection , 2011, PloS one.
[8] Lee M. Miller,et al. The Role of Alpha Activity in Spatial and Feature-Based Attention , 2016, eNeuro.
[9] H. Müller,et al. Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[10] Jan Theeuwes,et al. Statistical Regularities Modulate Attentional Capture , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[11] G. Horstmann. Attentional capture by an unannounced color singleton depends on expectation discrepancy. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[12] Daniel B. Vatterott,et al. Experience-dependent attentional tuning of distractor rejection , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[13] T. Braver. The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[14] H. Egeth,et al. Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.
[15] John H. R. Maunsell,et al. Feature-based attention in visual cortex , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.
[16] Carly J. Leonard,et al. Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs , 2015, Psychological science.
[17] Marlene Behrmann,et al. Probability Cuing of Target Location Facilitates Visual Search Implicitly in Normal Participants and Patients with Hemispatial Neglect , 2002, Psychological science.
[18] Jason T. Arita,et al. Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[19] Veit Stuphorn,et al. Trial-by-trial adjustments of top-down set modulate oculomotor capture , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[20] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[21] Susan L. Franzel,et al. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[22] H. J. Muller,et al. Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[23] John T Serences,et al. Searching for an Oddball: Neural Correlates of Singleton Detection Mode in Parietal Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[24] S. Treue,et al. Feature-Based Attention Increases the Selectivity of Population Responses in Primate Visual Cortex , 2004, Current Biology.
[25] Carly J. Leonard,et al. The role of magnocellular signals in oculomotor attentional capture. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[26] R. Desimone,et al. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.
[27] J. Duncan,et al. Competitive brain activity in visual attention , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[28] Stefanie I. Becker,et al. Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[29] Leonardo Chelazzi,et al. Orchestrating Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms for Filtering Distracting Information: Brain-Behavior Relationships Revealed by a Mixed-Design fMRI Study , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[30] Charles L. Folk,et al. Bottom-up priming of top-down attentional control settings , 2008 .
[31] Michel F. Failing,et al. Don’t let it distract you: how information about the availability of reward affects attentional selection , 2017, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[32] S. Yantis,et al. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[33] Joy J. Geng,et al. Attentional Mechanisms of Distractor Suppression , 2014 .
[34] Howard E Egeth,et al. Taming the White Bear , 2016, Psychological science.
[35] D G Pelli,et al. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[36] J. Theeuwes. Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.
[37] K. Nakayama,et al. Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.
[38] N. Lavie,et al. The Role of Perceptual Load in Processing Distractor Faces , 2003, Psychological science.
[39] Dominique Lamy,et al. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[40] K. Nakayama,et al. Priming of popout: II. Role of position , 1996 .
[41] Howard E Egeth,et al. The ignoring paradox: Cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[42] Steven J. Luck,et al. Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons , 2016, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[43] Nicholas Gaspelin,et al. Distinguishing Among Potential Mechanisms of Singleton Suppression , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[44] J. Theeuwes,et al. On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention , 2000 .
[45] J. Theeuwes. Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.
[46] M. Masson,et al. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[47] Andrew B. Leber,et al. Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.
[48] Jacqueline Gottlieb,et al. Integration of Exogenous Input into a Dynamic Salience Map Revealed by Perturbing Attention , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[49] M. Behrmann,et al. Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.
[50] D. E. Irwin,et al. Our Eyes do Not Always Go Where we Want Them to Go: Capture of the Eyes by New Objects , 1998 .
[51] J. Theeuwes,et al. Evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.
[52] M. Posner,et al. Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[53] Joseph Krummenacher,et al. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons , 2008, Vision Research.
[54] G. Campana,et al. Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[55] Daniel B. Vatterott,et al. Rejecting salient distractors: Generalization from experience , 2017, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[56] Jan Theeuwes,et al. Exogenous visual orienting by reward. , 2014, Journal of vision.
[57] Jan Theeuwes,et al. Feature-based attention: it is all bottom-up priming , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[58] M. Chun,et al. The dark side of visual attention , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[59] J. Theeuwes. Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[60] N. Lavie. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[61] D H Brainard,et al. The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[62] J. Theeuwes. Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[63] K. Nakayama,et al. Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.
[64] Nicholas E. DiQuattro,et al. Presaccadic target competition attenuates distraction , 2017, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[65] Gernot Horstmann,et al. Evidence for Attentional Capture by a Surprising Color Singleton in Visual Search , 2002, Psychological science.
[66] D. Simons,et al. Moving and looming stimuli capture attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.
[67] J. C. Johnston,et al. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[68] H. Egeth,et al. Attention on autopilot: Past experience and attentional set , 2006 .
[69] Pierre Baldi,et al. Of bits and wows: A Bayesian theory of surprise with applications to attention , 2010, Neural Networks.
[70] S. Yantis,et al. Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.