The study reported in this document was conducted to identify, describe, and assess the potential of innovative approaches to integrating vocational and academic education as one way of helping students to understand the utility of academic learning. Research activities included case studies of fivs integrated-curriculum programs in California, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania; a literature review; consultation with experts; and cross-site analysis of integration issues. The study found that innovative efforts to achieve a new relationship and closer alignment between vocational and academic curriculum and instruction appir to be a highly promising trend. Some of the findings are the foliowing: ;1) curriculum development and professional development are key activities for implementing an integrated vocational /academic curriculum; (2) both academic and vocational instructors should be involved from the start; (3) social, intellectual, and physical barriers between the Jocational and academic staff must be breached; (4) 5 years is a minimum time to integrate the curricula; (5) curriculum integration efforts should not be focused strictly on "high technology" subjects at the expense of more traditional subjects; and (6) evaluation is weak in most programs, providing only anecdotal evidence of student benefit from curriculum integration. The report concludes that further research is needed but that vocational education can play a strengtnened role in an integrated curriculum, especially if state support is provided. (Appendices comprising the bulk of the document include the five case studies, examples of technical wri',iing assignments, and a 52-item bibliography.) (VC) 17-:eproduchs, supplied by EE are the best that can be madrfrom the or document. ***,*****************r***** Y, * * * * * * * V! * 7 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 7 * * * 7 * * * * * * * * * * * V, * POLICY STUDIES ASSOCIATES, INC. 1718 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N. W. SUITE 400 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20009 (202) 939-9780 THE CASE FOR INTEGRATING ACADEMIC AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION
[1]
J. L. Harrison,et al.
The Government Printing Office
,
1968,
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.
[2]
David W. Carraher,et al.
Mathematics in the streets and in schools
,
1985
.
[3]
H. Gardner,et al.
Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences
,
1983
.
[4]
L. Resnick.
Education and Learning to Think
,
1987
.
[5]
Robert Glaser,et al.
Thoughts on Expertise
,
1985
.
[6]
M. Kohn,et al.
Continuity of Learning-Generalization: The Effect of Job on Men's Intellective Process in the United States and Poland
,
1985,
American Journal of Sociology.
[7]
K. Stanfield.
The national commission on excellence in education
,
1984
.
[8]
Jerome M. Rosow,et al.
Training—the competitive edge: Introducing new technology into the workplace.
,
1988
.
[9]
Structures, Doctrines, and Polemical Ghosts: A Response to Feldman
,
1982
.
[10]
C. Bereiter.
How to Keep Thinking Skills from Going the Way of All Frills.
,
1984
.
[11]
J. Goodlad.
A Place Called School
,
1984
.
[12]
Edward E. Smith,et al.
The Teaching of Thinking
,
1985
.
[13]
A. Carnevale.
Workplace Basics: The Skills Employers Want.
,
1988
.
[14]
Sylvia Scribner,et al.
Knowledge at Work.
,
1985
.
[15]
Richard Paul,et al.
Critical Thinking: Fundamental to Education for a Free Society.
,
1984
.
[16]
George O. Klemp.
The Meaning of Success
,
1988
.