Throughput scaling laws of hybrid wireless networks with proximity preference

Recent studies suggest nodes in practical networks are more likely to communicate with nearby nodes than far away nodes, which is referred to as proximity preference. In this paper, we model proximity preference by assuming the probability of communication follows a power law distribution with respect to distance and analyze its influence on the throughput of a hybrid network. Moreover, L-maximum-hop routing strategy is adopted to enforce delay constraints. Throughput is derived as a function of maximum hop L, proximity preference index α and the number of base stations (BSs) m. It is also found that per-node throughput changes with α. When 0 ≤ α ≤ 2, proximity has no influence on throughput. When 2 ≤ α ≤ 3, the throughput increases with α. Otherwise, the throughput reaches its maximum and remains constant. Our results demonstrate the interplay of various networks parameters with proximity preference and provide guidelines for the design of practical networks.

[1]  Xin Wang,et al.  On the Throughput Capacity and Performance Analysis of Hybrid Wireless Networks over Fading Channels , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  Xinbing Wang,et al.  Delay-throughput tradeoff with correlated mobility of ad-hoc networks , 2014, IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[3]  Hamid R. Sadjadpour,et al.  Capacity of composite networks: Combining social and wireless ad hoc networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[4]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  Capacity of ad hoc wireless networks with infrastructure support , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[5]  Xinbing Wang,et al.  Capacity of Hybrid Wireless Networks with Directional Antenna and Delay Constraint , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[6]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN , 2001 .

[7]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  On the capacity of hybrid wireless networks , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[8]  Hamid R. Sadjadpour,et al.  Capacity of Wireless Networks with Social Behavior , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[9]  Yu Cheng,et al.  Throughput and delay analysis of hybrid wireless networks with multi-hop uplinks , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[10]  Jianfeng Ma,et al.  Throughput and Delay Tradeoffs for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks With Reference Point Group Mobility , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The small-world phenomenon: an algorithmic perspective , 2000, STOC '00.

[12]  David Tse,et al.  Mobility increases the capacity of ad hoc wireless networks , 2002, TNET.

[13]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  Scaling Laws for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks: An Information Theoretic Approach , 2006, Found. Trends Netw..

[14]  Ying-Dar Lin,et al.  Multihop cellular: a new architecture for wireless communications , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).