Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Reusable Launch Vehicles for Different Propellants and Objectives

Identifying the optimal design of a new launch vehicle is most important since design decisions made in the early development phase limit the vehicles' later performance and determines the associated costs. Reusing the first stage via retro-propulsive landing increases the complexity even more. Therefore, we develop an optimization framework for partially reusable launch vehicles, which enables multidisciplinary design studies. The framework contains suitable mass estimates of all essential subsystems and a routine to calculate the needed propellant for the ascent and landing maneuvers. For design optimization, the framework can be coupled with a genetic algorithm. The overall goal is to reveal the implications of different propellant combinations and objective functions on the launcher's optimal design for various mission scenarios. The results show that the optimization objective influences the most suitable propellant choice and the overall launcher design, concerning staging, weight, size, and rocket engine parameters. In terms of gross lift-off weight, liquid hydrogen seems to be favorable. When optimizing for a minimum structural mass or an expandable structural mass, hydrocarbon-based solutions show better results. Finally, launch vehicles using a hydrocarbon fuel in the first stage and liquid hydrogen in the upper stage are an appealing alternative, combining both fuels' benefits.

[1]  Simon Jentzsch.  Optimization of a Reusable Launch Vehicle using Genetic Algorithms , 2020 .

[2]  Marc Parizeau,et al.  DEAP: evolutionary algorithms made easy , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[3]  Christian Mundt,et al.  Cryogenic Launcher Stage Optimization Toolbox , 2018 .

[4]  Sangho Ko,et al.  Genetic algorithm to optimize the design of main combustor and gas generator in liquid rocket engines , 2014 .

[5]  Loïc Brevault,et al.  Multi-Objective Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Approach for Partially Reusable Launch Vehicle Design , 2020 .

[6]  Robert S. Ryan,et al.  Launch Vehicle Design Process: Characterization, Technical Integration, and Lessons Learned , 2001 .

[7]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Use of the Collaborative Optimization Architecture for Launch Vehicle Design , 1996 .

[8]  Martin Sippel,et al.  Assessment of a European Reusable VTVL Booster Stage , 2018 .

[9]  M. Oschwald,et al.  Laser ignition of a multi-injector LOX/methane combustor , 2018 .

[10]  John R. Olds,et al.  Recent experiences in multidisciplinary conceptual design optimization for launch vehicles , 1996 .

[11]  B. PaulAcquatella,et al.  Multidisciplinary modeling and simulation framework for launch vehicle system dynamics and control , 2020 .

[12]  M. Oschwald,et al.  Experimental Study of Methane Heat Transfer Deterioration in a Subscale Combustion Chamber , 2019, Journal of Propulsion and Power.

[13]  David Coley,et al.  Introduction to Genetic Algorithms for Scientists and Engineers , 1999 .

[14]  Dietrich E. Koelle.  Handbook of cost engineering for space transportation systems with transcost 7.0 : statistical-analytical model for cost estimation and economical optimization of launch vehicles , 2000 .

[15]  Christof Büskens,et al.  Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Models and Algorithms for Space Launch Vehicles , 2010 .

[16]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice - evolution strategies, evolutionary programming, genetic algorithms , 1996 .

[17]  Sebastien Defoort,et al.  Advanced Space Vehicle Design Taking into Account Multidisciplinary Couplings and Mixed Epistemic/Aleatory Uncertainties , 2016 .

[18]  Francesco Castellini,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Global Techniques for Performance and Design Optimization of Launchers , 2012 .

[19]  Lâle Evrim Briese,et al.  European Next Reusable Ariane ( ENTRAIN ) : A Multidisciplinary Study on a VTVL and a VTHL Booster Stage , 2019 .

[20]  Günther Waxenegger-Wilfing,et al.  Heat Transfer Prediction for Methane in Regenerative Cooling Channels with Neural Networks , 2019, Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer.

[21]  Marc Schoenauer,et al.  Multi-disciplinary Analysis and Optimisation Approach for the Design of Expendable Launchers , 2004 .

[22]  El-Ghazali Talbi,et al.  Bayesian optimization of variable-size design space problems , 2020, Optimization and Engineering.

[23]  Tapabrata Ray.  Evolutionary Algorithm use in Optimisation of a Launch Vehicle Stack Model , 2007 .

[24]  James R. Wertz.  RESPONSIVE LAUNCH VEHICLE COST MODEL , 2004 .

[25]  Roy J. Hartfield,et al.  Design Optimization of a Space Launch Vehicle Using a Genetic Algorithm , 2007 .

[26]  Steffen Christall.  Linking of Liquid Bipropellant Rocket Engine Design Methodology with Launch Vehicle Optimization , 2017 .

[27]  Matthew L. Marcus,et al.  Low Earth Orbit Debris Removal Technology Assessment Using Genetic Algorithms , 2017 .

[28]  D. E Koelle,et al.  The cost-optimal size of future reusable launch vehicles , 2000 .

[29]  Francesco Castellini.  Multidisciplinary design optimization for expendable launch vehicles , 2012 .

[30]  Mathieu Balesdent,et al.  Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Launch Vehicles , 2011 .