Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy

Innovations of organizations are doubly embedded in knowledge networks constituted by coupling among knowledge elements and in social networks formed by collaborative relationships among organizations. This study explores the structural properties of such relationships and their possible influences on organizational innovations in terms of exploitation and exploration in the emerging nano-energy field. Results indicate that the knowledge networks and the technology-based collaboration networks in the nano-energy field are decoupled and that they have different degrees of integration. Some structural features of knowledge and collaboration networks influence organizations’ exploitative and exploratory innovations in diverse ways. Firstly, direct ties of an organization's knowledge elements in a knowledge network have an inverted U-shaped effect on its exploitative innovation, which is not the case in exploratory innovation. Direct ties in a collaboration network have an inverted U-shaped effect on both its exploitative and exploratory innovations. Secondly, indirect ties of an organization's knowledge elements in a knowledge network affect its exploitative innovation, but not its exploratory innovation. However, indirect ties in a collaboration network affect exploratory innovation, but not exploitative innovation. Thirdly, non-redundancy among ties in a knowledge network exhibits the opposite effect, hindering exploitative innovation, but favoring exploratory innovation. By contrast, non-redundancy among ties in a collaboration network favors exploitative innovation, but shows a non-significant effect on exploratory innovation.

[1]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  The Nature of Technology: What it Is and How it Evolves , 2009 .

[2]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  D. Harhoff,et al.  The Value of European Patents , 2008 .

[4]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  Patterns of technological innovation and evolution in the energy sector: A patent-based approach , 2013 .

[5]  Jingjing Zhang,et al.  The impact of multilevel networks on innovation , 2015 .

[6]  Wim Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Explorative and exploitative learning strategies in technology-based alliance networks , 2004 .

[7]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[8]  Q. Vuong Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses , 1989 .

[9]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Measuring scientific research in emerging nano-energy field , 2014, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[10]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[11]  Michael C. Connelly,et al.  U. S. energy production activity and innovation , 2012 .

[12]  Y. Bian Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China , 1997 .

[13]  A. Swaminathan,et al.  Framing Interorganizational Network Change: A Network Inertia Perspective , 2006 .

[14]  Martin Gargiulo,et al.  Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes, and the Adaptation of Social Capital , 2000 .

[15]  Myung S. Jhon,et al.  Nanotechnology for sustainable development: retrospective and outlook , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[16]  Hélène Dernis,et al.  Measuring Patent Quality , 2013 .

[17]  Gianluca Carnabuci,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Knowledge Brokerage and the Uneven Growth of Technology Domains , 2009 .

[18]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs , 2013, Scientometrics.

[19]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  Sharon Belenzon,et al.  Innovation and firm value: An investigation of the changing role of patents, 1985–2007 , 2013 .

[22]  Fariborz Damanpour,et al.  The Application of External Knowledge: Organizational Conditions for Exploration and Exploitation , 2009 .

[23]  C. Phelps A Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Alliance Network Structure and Composition on Firm Exploratory Innovation , 2009 .

[24]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[25]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[26]  Na Liu,et al.  Dynamic evolution of collaborative networks: evidence from nano-energy research in China , 2014, Scientometrics.

[27]  Ariel Pakes,et al.  Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During Thepost-1950 Period , 1985 .

[28]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[29]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: The case of pharmaceutical biotechnology , 2006 .

[31]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[32]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[33]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  The Dynamics of Competitive Intensity , 1997 .

[34]  Jiang MingJi,et al.  Research on the Patent Innovation Performance of University–Industry Collaboration Based on Complex Network Analysis , 2014 .

[35]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[36]  Irem Demirkan,et al.  Exploring the Role of Network Characteristics, Knowledge Quality, and Inertia on the Evolution of Scientific Networks , 2013 .

[37]  J. Schumpeter The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[38]  M. Gittelman,et al.  A Note on the Value of Patents as Indicators of Innovation: Implications for Management Research , 2008 .

[39]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[40]  Ralph A. Heidl,et al.  Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks , 2011 .

[41]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Network Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density , 2006 .

[42]  Sai Yayavaram,et al.  Decomposability in Knowledge Structures and Its Impact on the Usefulness of Inventions and Knowledge-base Malleability , 2008 .

[43]  Matthew Semadeni,et al.  Value of Strong Ties to Disconnected Others: Examining Knowledge Creation in Biomedicine , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[44]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[45]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Creative Imitation: Exploring the Case of Cross-Industry Innovation , 2010 .

[46]  Peter Moran Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance , 2005 .

[47]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[48]  Janghyeok Yoon,et al.  Assessing coreness and intermediarity of technology sectors using patent co-classification analysis: the case of Korean national R&D , 2013, Scientometrics.

[49]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[50]  E. Mansfield Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study , 1986 .

[51]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation: a review , 1992 .

[52]  Greg Tegart,et al.  Energy and nanotechnologies: Priority areas for Australia's future , 2009 .

[53]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[54]  Irem Demirkan,et al.  Network Characteristics and Patenting in Biotechnology, 1990-2006 , 2012 .

[55]  Eldon Y. Li,et al.  Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective , 2013 .

[56]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of Panel Data , 1987 .

[57]  Ashish Arora,et al.  The Value of International Patent Rights , 2001 .

[58]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .

[59]  Chao-Hung Wang,et al.  Building exploration and exploitation in the high-tech industry: The role of relationship learning. , 2014 .

[60]  Ana Menéndez-Manjón,et al.  Nano-energy research trends: bibliometrical analysis of nanotechnology research in the energy sector , 2011 .

[61]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[62]  U. Cantner,et al.  International research networks in pharmaceuticals: Structure and dynamics , 2014 .

[63]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[64]  Francesco Quatraro,et al.  Knowledge Coherence, Variety and economic Growth: Manufacturing Evidence from Italian Regions , 2010 .

[65]  Wei-ping Wu Dimensions of Social Capital and Firm Competitiveness Improvement: The Mediating Role of Information Sharing , 2007 .

[66]  José Lobo,et al.  Measuring the Relative Importance of Reusing, Recombining and Creating Technologies in the Process of Invention , 2011 .

[67]  Timo Fischer,et al.  Testing patent value indicators on directly observed patent value—An empirical analysis of Ocean Tomo patent auctions , 2014 .

[68]  Jens Leker,et al.  How to measure technological distance in collaborations? The case of electric mobility , 2013, 2013 Proceedings of PICMET '13: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services (PICMET).

[69]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[70]  Douglas E. Polley,et al.  Technological knowledge breadth and depth: performance impacts , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[71]  Se Kyoung Choi,et al.  Antecedents of relational inertia and information sharing in SNS usage: The moderating role of structural autonomy ☆ , 2015 .

[72]  L. Nesta,et al.  Substitutability and complementarity of technological knowledge and the inventive performance of semiconductor companies , 2014 .

[73]  Gianluca Carnabuci,et al.  Where do firms' recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms' ability to innovate through technological recombination , 2013 .

[74]  K. Rost The strength of strong ties in the creation of innovation , 2011 .

[75]  A. Karamanos,et al.  Leveraging Micro‐ and Macro‐Structures of Embeddedness in Alliance Networks for Exploratory Innovation in Biotechnology , 2012 .

[76]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  The impact of university–industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals , 2013 .

[77]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  Modeling and analyzing technology innovation in the energy sector: Patent-based HMM approach , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[78]  Leon A.G. Oerlemans,et al.  Radical changes in inter-organizational network structures: The longitudinal gap , 2006 .

[79]  J. Davidson Frame,et al.  Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data , 1994 .

[80]  Wai Fong Boh,et al.  Balancing breadth and depth of expertise for innovation: A 3M story , 2014 .

[81]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[82]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[83]  Simon Rodan,et al.  Knowledge Networks, Collaboration Networks, and Exploratory Innovation , 2014 .

[84]  Na Liu,et al.  Invention profiles and uneven growth in the field of emerging nano-energy , 2015 .

[85]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  The impact of network embeddedness on research output , 2013 .

[86]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[87]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Small Worlds: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Structure , 2013 .

[88]  C. A. Benavides-Velasco,et al.  Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification , 2008 .

[89]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[90]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[91]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Network Evolution: The Origins of Structural Holes , 2009 .