Why Leaders Not Always Disapprove of Unethical Follower Behavior: It Depends on the Leader’s Self-Interest and Accountability

By showing disapproval of unethical follower behavior (UFB), leaders help creating an ethical climate in their organization in which it is clear what is morally acceptable or not. In this research, we examine factors influencing whether leaders consistently show such disapproval. Specifically, we argue that holding leaders accountable for their actions should motivate them to disapprove of UFB. However, this effect of accountability should be inhibited when leaders personally benefit from UFB. This prediction was supported in a lab experiment. Furthermore, a follow-up study showed that followers in fact accurately predict when leaders will most likely disapprove of UFB. These findings imply that followers can thus get away with unethical behavior in some situations and they are capable of accurately predicting such situations.

[1]  B. Rosen,et al.  Factors influencing disciplinary judgments. , 1974 .

[2]  Elizabeth Newton,et al.  The Social Context of Negotiation , 1993 .

[3]  D. Cremer,et al.  Paying for sanctions in social dilemmas: The effects of endowment asymmetry and accountability , 2009 .

[4]  Kenneth D. Butterfield,et al.  Punishment from the Manager's Perspective: A Grounded Investigation and Inductive Model , 1996 .

[5]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Understanding subordinate reactions to punishment incidents: Perspectives from justice and social affect , 1992 .

[6]  D. Cremer,et al.  How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. , 2002 .

[7]  H. Kelley.  Attribution in social interaction. , 1987 .

[8]  Pat Barclay.  Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the ''tragedy of the commons'' , 2004 .

[9]  Terry Bristol,et al.  Supervising the Unethical Selling Behavior of Top Sales Performers: Assessing the Impact of Social Desirability Bias , 2005 .

[10]  R. Hasty,et al.  Supervising Unethical Sales Force Behavior: How Strong is the Tendency to Treat Top Sales Performers Leniently? , 2003 .

[11]  C. Sedikides,et al.  Reputational Implications of Procedural Fairness for Personal and Relational Self-Esteem , 2008 .

[12]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[13]  T. Carson,et al.  Self–Interest and Business Ethics: Some Lessons of the Recent Corporate Scandals , 2003 .

[14]  John A. Bargh,et al.  The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption. , 2001 .

[15]  E. E. Jones.  Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior , 1987 .

[16]  Laura Pincus Hartman,et al.  A Qualitative Investigation of Perceived Executive Ethical Leadership: Perceptions from Inside and Outside the Executive Suite , 2003 .

[17]  D. Cremer.  Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making , 2009 .

[18]  M. Ronald Buckley,et al.  The Hypothesized Relationship Between Accountability and Ethical Behavior , 2001 .

[19]  M. Banaji,et al.  Bounded Ethicality as a Psychological Barrier to Recognizing Conflicts of Interest , 2005 .

[20]  D. Cremer.  Psychology and ethics: What it takes to feel ethical when being unethical. , 2009 .

[21]  Michael E. Brown,et al.  Ethical leadership: A review and future directions , 2006 .

[22]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Instilling ethical behavior in organizations: A survey of Canadian companies , 1996 .

[23]  Linda Klebe Trevino,et al.  Experimental Approaches to Studying Ethical-Unethical Behavior in Organizations , 1992, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[24]  M. van vugt,et al.  Nice Guys Finish First: The Competitive Altruism Hypothesis , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[25]  D. Cremer,et al.  Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader self-confidence , 2004 .

[26]  E. Lind.  Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. , 2001 .

[27]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Psychological perspectives on the self , 1982 .

[28]  D. De Cremer,et al.  Justifying Decisions in Social Dilemmas: Justification Pressures and Tacit Coordination Under Environmental Uncertainty , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[29]  R. Kurzban,et al.  Audience effects on moralistic punishment , 2007 .

[30]  P. Northouse.  Leadership: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[31]  Randall P. Settoon,et al.  Social Exchange in Organizations: Perceived Organizational Support, Leader-Member Exchange, and Employee Reciprocity , 1996 .

[32]  Constantine Sedikides,et al.  Accountability as a deterrent to self-enhancement: the search for mechanisms. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[34]  Don A. Moore,et al.  Self-Interest, Automaticity, and the Psychology of Conflict of Interest , 2004 .

[35]  Joe C Magee,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Power and Perspectives Not Taken , 2022 .

[36]  Lynn R Offerman.  When followers become toxic. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[37]  B. Monin,et al.  From Sucker to Saint , 2008, Psychological science.

[38]  S. Fiske.  Effects of power on bias: Power explains and maintains individual, group, and societal disparities. , 2001 .

[39]  G. R. Ferris,et al.  Leader reputation and accountability in organizations: Implications for dysfunctional leader behavior , 2004 .

[40]  Brent A. Scott,et al.  An actor-focused model of justice rule adherence and violation: the role of managerial motives and discretion. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Advances in Organizational Justice , 2001 .

[42]  R. Boyd,et al.  Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem , 2004, Nature.

[43]  Bernadette Park,et al.  Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders’ social attention☆ , 2006 .

[44]  G. Latham,et al.  Effects of training in procedural justice on perceptions of disciplinary fairness by unionized employees and disciplinary subject matter experts. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  Charismatic leadership in organizations , 1998 .

[46]  Timothy T. Baldwin,et al.  Setting the stage for effective leadership: Antecedents of transformational leadership behavior , 2004 .

[47]  David De Cremer,et al.  When and how communicated guilt affects contributions in public good dilemmas , 2009 .

[48]  R. Sims.  Toward a Better Understanding of Organizational Efforts to Rebuild Reputation Following an Ethical Scandal , 2009 .

[49]  Joseph A. Bellizzi Tom.  Disciplining top‐performing unethical salespeople: Examining the moderating effects of ethical seriousness and consequences , 2006 .

[50]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accounting for the effects of accountability. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[51]  J. D. Coninck.  How sales managers control unethical sales force behavior , 1992 .

[52]  S. Fiske,et al.  Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[53]  Linda Klebe Trevino,et al.  Moral Person and Moral Manager: How Executives Develop a Reputation for Ethical Leadership , 2000 .

[54]  Lawrence B. Chonko,et al.  Ethics and marketing management: An empirical examination , 1985 .

[55]  S. Grover,et al.  Why Professionals Lie: The Impact of Professional Role Conflict on Reporting Accuracy , 1993 .

[56]  P. Tetlock.  The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward A Social Contingency Model , 1992 .

[57]  David M. Messick,et al.  Ethical Fading: The Role of Self-Deception in Unethical Behavior , 2004 .

[58]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Generalizing From Laboratory to Field Settings. , 1987 .

[59]  Johan C. Karremans,et al.  The role of automaticity in determining the inclination to forgive close others , 2007 .

[60]  Michael E. Price,et al.  Monitoring, reputation, and ‘greenbeard’ reciprocity in a Shuar work team , 2006 .

[61]  R. Hite,et al.  Supervising Unethical Salesforce Behavior , 1989 .

[62]  M. Milinski,et al.  Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’ , 2002, Nature.

[63]  Linda Klebe Trevino,et al.  The Social Implications of Punishing Unethical Behavior: Observers' Cognitive and Affective Reactions , 1992 .

[64]  L. Treviño.  Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model , 1986 .

[65]  H. P. Sims,et al.  A conceptual analysis of cognition and affect in organizational punishment , 1991 .

[66]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  The accountability of conduct : a social psychological analysis , 1984 .