Adapting the Interactive Activation Model for Context Recognition and Identification

In this article, we propose and implement a new model for context recognition and identification. Our work is motivated by the importance of “working in context” for knowledge workers to stay focused and productive. A computer application that can identify the current context in which the knowledge worker is working can (among other things) provide the worker with contextual support, for example, by suggesting relevant information sources, or give an overview of how he or she spent his or her time during the day. We present a descriptive model for the context of a knowledge worker. This model describes the contextual elements in the work environment of the knowledge worker and how these elements relate to each other. This model is operationalized in an algorithm, the contextual interactive activation model (CIA), which is based on the interactive activation model by Rumelhart and McClelland. It consists of a layered connected network through which activation flows. We have tested CIA in a context identification setting. In this case, the data that we use as input is low-level computer interaction logging data. We found that topical information and entities were the most relevant types of information for context identification. Overall the proposed CIA model is more effective than traditional supervised methods in identifying the active context from sparse input data, with less labelled training data.

[1]  Vadim Ermolayev,et al.  A Context Model for Knowledge Workers , 2010, CIAO@EKAW.

[2]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Simulating cross-language competition with the bilingual interactive activation model. , 1998 .

[3]  Yan Liu,et al.  Learning with Minimum Supervision: A General Framework for Transductive Transfer Learning , 2011, 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining.

[4]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  A General Survey of Privacy-Preserving Data Mining Models and Algorithms , 2008, Privacy-Preserving Data Mining.

[5]  SappelliMaya,et al.  Adapting the Interactive Activation Model for Context Recognition and Identification , 2016 .

[6]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  Context Modelling for Situation-Sensitive Recommendations , 2011, FQAS.

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[8]  CaverleeJames,et al.  ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) Special Issue on Trust and Influence in Intelligent Human-Machine Interaction , 2018 .

[9]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[10]  Jan Haas,et al.  CONTASK: Context-Sensitive Task Assistance in the Semantic Desktop , 2010, ICEIS.

[11]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  A hybrid learning system for recognizing user tasks from desktop activities and email messages , 2006, IUI '06.

[12]  Andreas S. Rath,et al.  Machine Learning based Work Task Classification , 2009, J. Digit. Inf. Manag..

[13]  Wessel Kraaij,et al.  The SWELL Knowledge Work Dataset for Stress and User Modeling Research , 2014, ICMI.

[14]  Dunja Mladenic,et al.  Exploring Contexts and Actions in Knowledge Processes , 2010, CIAO@EKAW.

[15]  Oliver Brdiczka,et al.  From documents to tasks: deriving user tasks from document usage patterns , 2010, IUI '10.

[16]  Brenda Dervin,et al.  Given a context by any other name: methodological tools for taming the unruly beast , 1997 .

[17]  John Davies,et al.  Context as a Tool for Organizing and Sharing Knowledge , 2010, CIAO@EKAW.

[18]  Analía Amandi,et al.  Modeling sequences of user actions for statistical goal recognition , 2011, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[19]  Siegfried Handschuh,et al.  Task-Based User Modelling for Knowledge Work Support , 2010, UMAP.

[20]  Andreas S. Rath,et al.  EXPLOITING THE USER INTERACTION CONTEXT FOR AUTOMATIC TASK DETECTION , 2012, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[21]  Wessel Kraaij,et al.  E-mail categorization using partially related training examples , 2014, IIiX.

[22]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  A Conceptual Framework and a Toolkit for Supporting the Rapid Prototyping of Context-Aware Applications , 2001, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[23]  Jack Park,et al.  IRIS: Integrate. Relate. Infer. Share , 2005, Semantic Desktop Workshop.

[24]  Patrick Brézillon Context in Artificial Intelligence II. Key Elements of Contexts , 1999, Comput. Artif. Intell..

[25]  G. Bower,et al.  Human Associative Memory , 1973 .

[26]  Franco Turini,et al.  Time-Annotated Sequences for Medical Data Mining , 2007 .

[27]  Patrick Brézillon,et al.  Context in Artificial Intelligence: I. A Survey of the Literature , 1999, Comput. Artif. Intell..

[28]  Max Mühlhäuser,et al.  Task Models for Intention-Aware Systems , 2011, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[29]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Incorporating Non-local Information into Information Extraction Systems by Gibbs Sampling , 2005, ACL.

[30]  Liliana Ardissono,et al.  Context-dependent awareness support in open collaboration environments , 2012, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[31]  Varol Akman,et al.  Steps Toward Formalizing Context , 1996, AI Mag..

[32]  Wessel Kraaij,et al.  Real-time task recognition based on knowledge workers' computer activities , 2012, ECCE.

[33]  Ramesh Nallapati,et al.  A Comparative Study of Methods for Transductive Transfer Learning , 2007, Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW 2007).

[34]  Gail C. Murphy Task Context for Knowledge Workers , 2012 .

[35]  Siegfried Handschuh,et al.  The NEPOMUK Project - On the way to the Social Semantic Desktop , 2007 .

[36]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Predicting User Tasks : I Know What You ’ re Doing ! , 2005 .

[37]  Marko Grobelnik,et al.  Using task context to achieve effective information delivery , 2009, CIAO '09.

[38]  Leo Sauermann,et al.  The Gnowsis semantic desktop approach to personal information management: weaving the personal semantic web , 2009 .

[39]  Wessel Kraaij,et al.  Collecting a dataset of information behaviour in context , 2014, CARR '14.

[40]  David Bawden,et al.  The dark side of information: overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[41]  David B. Leake,et al.  WordSieve: A Method for Real-Time Context Extraction , 2001, CONTEXT.

[42]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context , 2005, The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval.

[43]  Paul Warren,et al.  Personal Information Management: The Case for an Evolutionary Approach , 2014, Interact. Comput..

[44]  Paul Dourish,et al.  What we talk about when we talk about context , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[45]  Nuria Oliver,et al.  SWISH: semantic analysis of window titles and switching history , 2006, IUI '06.

[46]  Andreas S. Rath,et al.  Studying the Factors Influencing Automatic User Task Detection on the Computer Desktop , 2010, EC-TEL.

[47]  Kei Ogasawara,et al.  A project restarting support system using the historical log of a user's window usage , 2010, OZCHI '10.

[48]  Wessel Kraaij,et al.  Using file system content to organize , 2018 .

[49]  Wessel Kraaij,et al.  Term Extraction for User Profiling: Evaluation by the User , 2013, UMAP Workshops.

[50]  Patrick Brézillon,et al.  Modeling and Using Context for System Development: Lessons from Experience , 2001, J. Decis. Syst..

[51]  Carlo Penco Objective and Cognitive Context , 1999, CONTEXT.

[52]  John McCarthy,et al.  Notes on Formalizing Context , 1993, IJCAI.

[53]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  LifeLogging: Personal Big Data , 2014, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[54]  Ansgar Bernardi,et al.  Leveraging Passive Paper Piles to Active Objects in Personal Knowledge Spaces , 2005, Wissensmanagement.

[55]  Karl Gyllstrom,et al.  Seeing is retrieving: building information context from what the user sees , 2008, IUI '08.